The effect of supplemental high Fidelity simulation training in medical students

• Main Authors: Lori Meyers, Bryan Mahoney, Troy Schaffernocker, David Way, Scott Winfield, Alberto Uribe, Ana Mavarez-Martinez, Marilly Palettas, Jonathan Lipps
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: BMC 2020-11-01
• Series: BMC Medical Education
• Subjects: Simulation-based education; Lecture-based education; High-fidelity simulation; Pulmonary physiology; First-year medical students
• Online Access: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12909-020-02322-y

Abstract Background Simulation-based education (SBE) with high-fidelity simulation (HFS) offers medical students early exposure to the clinical environment, allowing development of clinical scenarios and management. We hypothesized that supplementation of standard pulmonary physiology curriculum with HFS would improve the performance of first-year medical students on written tests of pulmonary physiology. Methods This observational pilot study included SBE with three HFS scenarios of patient care that highlighted basic pulmonary physiology. First-year medical students’ test scores of their cardio-pulmonary curriculum were compared between students who participated in SBE versus only lecture-based education (LBE). A survey was administered to the SBE group to assess their perception of the HFS. Results From a class of 188 first-year medical students, 89 (47%) participated in the SBE and the remaining 99 were considered as the LBE group. On their cardio-pulmonary curriculum test, the SBE group had a median score of 106 [IQR: 97,110] and LBE group of 99 [IQR: 89,105] (p < 0.001). For the pulmonary physiology subsection, scores were also significantly different between groups (p < 0.001). Conclusions Implementation of supplemental SBE could be an adequate technique to improve learning enhancement and overall satisfaction in preclinical medical students.