Privilege and Competition: Tashiroya in the East Asian Treaty Ports, 1860–1895

This paper attempts to illustrate the connectivities of the late-nineteenth-century treaty ports in East Asia, experienced by a Japanese business called Tashiroya. In the 1860s it had a monopoly over foreign trade in porcelain in Nagasaki, under the protection of the Saga domain. After the emergence...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Takahiro Yamamoto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg 2018-04-01
Series:Transcultural Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://heiup.uni-heidelberg.de/journals/index.php/transcultural/article/view/23669
id doaj-fe42e596fda44dceb86895acd704fe44
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fe42e596fda44dceb86895acd704fe442021-05-02T21:00:02ZengRuprecht-Karls-Universität HeidelbergTranscultural Studies2191-64112018-04-01827910210.17885/heiup.ts.2017.2.2366923669Privilege and Competition: Tashiroya in the East Asian Treaty Ports, 1860–1895Takahiro YamamotoThis paper attempts to illustrate the connectivities of the late-nineteenth-century treaty ports in East Asia, experienced by a Japanese business called Tashiroya. In the 1860s it had a monopoly over foreign trade in porcelain in Nagasaki, under the protection of the Saga domain. After the emergence of treaty port network that enabled freer movement of goods and people, Tashiroya lost its privilege and found itself in a competition in Chinese ports, not so much against the Western merchants, but with its domestic peers. In an effort to deal with the new commercial environment around the East China Sea, Tashiroya’s family members and employees set up branch stores in  the treaty ports and travelled around to carry goods and to seek business opportunities. They aimed at diversifying the merchandise and markets, which saw partial success. In doing so they also attempted to get around the taxation by the Chinese Maritime Customs, rather than calling for the revision of Japan’s unequal treaties. After a series of botched effort to maintain the price of porcelain products by forming a cartel with other Japanese exporters, Tashiroya ventured into an uncharted territory of exporting roof tiles to Korea, which it failed to implement. The paper overall provides a microhistory of the East Asian treaty ports, decoupled from the state-level analysis and the narratives driven by national history.https://heiup.uni-heidelberg.de/journals/index.php/transcultural/article/view/23669nagasakichinakoreamerchantsporcelain
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Takahiro Yamamoto
spellingShingle Takahiro Yamamoto
Privilege and Competition: Tashiroya in the East Asian Treaty Ports, 1860–1895
Transcultural Studies
nagasaki
china
korea
merchants
porcelain
author_facet Takahiro Yamamoto
author_sort Takahiro Yamamoto
title Privilege and Competition: Tashiroya in the East Asian Treaty Ports, 1860–1895
title_short Privilege and Competition: Tashiroya in the East Asian Treaty Ports, 1860–1895
title_full Privilege and Competition: Tashiroya in the East Asian Treaty Ports, 1860–1895
title_fullStr Privilege and Competition: Tashiroya in the East Asian Treaty Ports, 1860–1895
title_full_unstemmed Privilege and Competition: Tashiroya in the East Asian Treaty Ports, 1860–1895
title_sort privilege and competition: tashiroya in the east asian treaty ports, 1860–1895
publisher Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg
series Transcultural Studies
issn 2191-6411
publishDate 2018-04-01
description This paper attempts to illustrate the connectivities of the late-nineteenth-century treaty ports in East Asia, experienced by a Japanese business called Tashiroya. In the 1860s it had a monopoly over foreign trade in porcelain in Nagasaki, under the protection of the Saga domain. After the emergence of treaty port network that enabled freer movement of goods and people, Tashiroya lost its privilege and found itself in a competition in Chinese ports, not so much against the Western merchants, but with its domestic peers. In an effort to deal with the new commercial environment around the East China Sea, Tashiroya’s family members and employees set up branch stores in  the treaty ports and travelled around to carry goods and to seek business opportunities. They aimed at diversifying the merchandise and markets, which saw partial success. In doing so they also attempted to get around the taxation by the Chinese Maritime Customs, rather than calling for the revision of Japan’s unequal treaties. After a series of botched effort to maintain the price of porcelain products by forming a cartel with other Japanese exporters, Tashiroya ventured into an uncharted territory of exporting roof tiles to Korea, which it failed to implement. The paper overall provides a microhistory of the East Asian treaty ports, decoupled from the state-level analysis and the narratives driven by national history.
topic nagasaki
china
korea
merchants
porcelain
url https://heiup.uni-heidelberg.de/journals/index.php/transcultural/article/view/23669
work_keys_str_mv AT takahiroyamamoto privilegeandcompetitiontashiroyaintheeastasiantreatyports18601895
_version_ 1721487495575633920