The MOnitoring Resynchronization dEvices and CARdiac patiEnts (MORE-CARE) Randomized Controlled Trial: Phase 1 Results on Dynamics of Early Intervention With Remote Monitoring

BackgroundRemote monitoring (RM) in patients with advanced heart failure and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-D) may reduce delays in clinical decisions by transmitting automatic alerts. However, this strategy has never been tested specifically in this pa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Boriani, Giuseppe, Da Costa, Antoine, Ricci, Renato Pietro, Quesada, Aurelio, Favale, Stefano, Iacopino, Saverio, Romeo, Francesco, Risi, Arnaldo, Mangoni di S Stefano, Lorenza, Navarro, Xavier, Biffi, Mauro, Santini, Massimo, Burri, Haran
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JMIR Publications 2013-08-01
Series:Journal of Medical Internet Research
Online Access:http://www.jmir.org/2013/8/e167/
id doaj-fe3d6ece83c94ac083771005519ea3f5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fe3d6ece83c94ac083771005519ea3f52021-04-02T19:20:27ZengJMIR PublicationsJournal of Medical Internet Research1438-88712013-08-01158e16710.2196/jmir.2608The MOnitoring Resynchronization dEvices and CARdiac patiEnts (MORE-CARE) Randomized Controlled Trial: Phase 1 Results on Dynamics of Early Intervention With Remote MonitoringBoriani, GiuseppeDa Costa, AntoineRicci, Renato PietroQuesada, AurelioFavale, StefanoIacopino, SaverioRomeo, FrancescoRisi, ArnaldoMangoni di S Stefano, LorenzaNavarro, XavierBiffi, MauroSantini, MassimoBurri, Haran BackgroundRemote monitoring (RM) in patients with advanced heart failure and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-D) may reduce delays in clinical decisions by transmitting automatic alerts. However, this strategy has never been tested specifically in this patient population, with alerts for lung fluid overload, and in a European setting. ObjectiveThe main objective of Phase 1 (presented here) is to evaluate if RM strategy is able to reduce time from device-detected events to clinical decisions. MethodsIn this multicenter randomized controlled trial, patients with moderate to severe heart failure implanted with CRT-D devices were randomized to a Remote group (with remote follow-up and wireless automatic alerts) or to a Control group (with standard follow-up without alerts). The primary endpoint of Phase 1 was the delay between an alert event and clinical decisions related to the event in the first 154 enrolled patients followed for 1 year. ResultsThe median delay from device-detected events to clinical decisions was considerably shorter in the Remote group compared to the Control group: 2 (25th-75th percentile, 1-4) days vs 29 (25th-75th percentile, 3-51) days respectively, P=.004. In-hospital visits were reduced in the Remote group (2.0 visits/patient/year vs 3.2 visits/patient/year in the Control group, 37.5% relative reduction, P<.001). Automatic alerts were successfully transmitted in 93% of events occurring outside the hospital in the Remote group. The annual rate of all-cause hospitalizations per patient did not differ between the two groups (P=.65). ConclusionsRM in CRT-D patients with advanced heart failure allows physicians to promptly react to clinically relevant automatic alerts and significantly reduces the burden of in-hospital visits. Trial RegistrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT00885677; http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00885677 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6IkcCJ7NF).http://www.jmir.org/2013/8/e167/
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Boriani, Giuseppe
Da Costa, Antoine
Ricci, Renato Pietro
Quesada, Aurelio
Favale, Stefano
Iacopino, Saverio
Romeo, Francesco
Risi, Arnaldo
Mangoni di S Stefano, Lorenza
Navarro, Xavier
Biffi, Mauro
Santini, Massimo
Burri, Haran
spellingShingle Boriani, Giuseppe
Da Costa, Antoine
Ricci, Renato Pietro
Quesada, Aurelio
Favale, Stefano
Iacopino, Saverio
Romeo, Francesco
Risi, Arnaldo
Mangoni di S Stefano, Lorenza
Navarro, Xavier
Biffi, Mauro
Santini, Massimo
Burri, Haran
The MOnitoring Resynchronization dEvices and CARdiac patiEnts (MORE-CARE) Randomized Controlled Trial: Phase 1 Results on Dynamics of Early Intervention With Remote Monitoring
Journal of Medical Internet Research
author_facet Boriani, Giuseppe
Da Costa, Antoine
Ricci, Renato Pietro
Quesada, Aurelio
Favale, Stefano
Iacopino, Saverio
Romeo, Francesco
Risi, Arnaldo
Mangoni di S Stefano, Lorenza
Navarro, Xavier
Biffi, Mauro
Santini, Massimo
Burri, Haran
author_sort Boriani, Giuseppe
title The MOnitoring Resynchronization dEvices and CARdiac patiEnts (MORE-CARE) Randomized Controlled Trial: Phase 1 Results on Dynamics of Early Intervention With Remote Monitoring
title_short The MOnitoring Resynchronization dEvices and CARdiac patiEnts (MORE-CARE) Randomized Controlled Trial: Phase 1 Results on Dynamics of Early Intervention With Remote Monitoring
title_full The MOnitoring Resynchronization dEvices and CARdiac patiEnts (MORE-CARE) Randomized Controlled Trial: Phase 1 Results on Dynamics of Early Intervention With Remote Monitoring
title_fullStr The MOnitoring Resynchronization dEvices and CARdiac patiEnts (MORE-CARE) Randomized Controlled Trial: Phase 1 Results on Dynamics of Early Intervention With Remote Monitoring
title_full_unstemmed The MOnitoring Resynchronization dEvices and CARdiac patiEnts (MORE-CARE) Randomized Controlled Trial: Phase 1 Results on Dynamics of Early Intervention With Remote Monitoring
title_sort monitoring resynchronization devices and cardiac patients (more-care) randomized controlled trial: phase 1 results on dynamics of early intervention with remote monitoring
publisher JMIR Publications
series Journal of Medical Internet Research
issn 1438-8871
publishDate 2013-08-01
description BackgroundRemote monitoring (RM) in patients with advanced heart failure and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-D) may reduce delays in clinical decisions by transmitting automatic alerts. However, this strategy has never been tested specifically in this patient population, with alerts for lung fluid overload, and in a European setting. ObjectiveThe main objective of Phase 1 (presented here) is to evaluate if RM strategy is able to reduce time from device-detected events to clinical decisions. MethodsIn this multicenter randomized controlled trial, patients with moderate to severe heart failure implanted with CRT-D devices were randomized to a Remote group (with remote follow-up and wireless automatic alerts) or to a Control group (with standard follow-up without alerts). The primary endpoint of Phase 1 was the delay between an alert event and clinical decisions related to the event in the first 154 enrolled patients followed for 1 year. ResultsThe median delay from device-detected events to clinical decisions was considerably shorter in the Remote group compared to the Control group: 2 (25th-75th percentile, 1-4) days vs 29 (25th-75th percentile, 3-51) days respectively, P=.004. In-hospital visits were reduced in the Remote group (2.0 visits/patient/year vs 3.2 visits/patient/year in the Control group, 37.5% relative reduction, P<.001). Automatic alerts were successfully transmitted in 93% of events occurring outside the hospital in the Remote group. The annual rate of all-cause hospitalizations per patient did not differ between the two groups (P=.65). ConclusionsRM in CRT-D patients with advanced heart failure allows physicians to promptly react to clinically relevant automatic alerts and significantly reduces the burden of in-hospital visits. Trial RegistrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT00885677; http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00885677 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6IkcCJ7NF).
url http://www.jmir.org/2013/8/e167/
work_keys_str_mv AT borianigiuseppe themonitoringresynchronizationdevicesandcardiacpatientsmorecarerandomizedcontrolledtrialphase1resultsondynamicsofearlyinterventionwithremotemonitoring
AT dacostaantoine themonitoringresynchronizationdevicesandcardiacpatientsmorecarerandomizedcontrolledtrialphase1resultsondynamicsofearlyinterventionwithremotemonitoring
AT riccirenatopietro themonitoringresynchronizationdevicesandcardiacpatientsmorecarerandomizedcontrolledtrialphase1resultsondynamicsofearlyinterventionwithremotemonitoring
AT quesadaaurelio themonitoringresynchronizationdevicesandcardiacpatientsmorecarerandomizedcontrolledtrialphase1resultsondynamicsofearlyinterventionwithremotemonitoring
AT favalestefano themonitoringresynchronizationdevicesandcardiacpatientsmorecarerandomizedcontrolledtrialphase1resultsondynamicsofearlyinterventionwithremotemonitoring
AT iacopinosaverio themonitoringresynchronizationdevicesandcardiacpatientsmorecarerandomizedcontrolledtrialphase1resultsondynamicsofearlyinterventionwithremotemonitoring
AT romeofrancesco themonitoringresynchronizationdevicesandcardiacpatientsmorecarerandomizedcontrolledtrialphase1resultsondynamicsofearlyinterventionwithremotemonitoring
AT risiarnaldo themonitoringresynchronizationdevicesandcardiacpatientsmorecarerandomizedcontrolledtrialphase1resultsondynamicsofearlyinterventionwithremotemonitoring
AT mangonidisstefanolorenza themonitoringresynchronizationdevicesandcardiacpatientsmorecarerandomizedcontrolledtrialphase1resultsondynamicsofearlyinterventionwithremotemonitoring
AT navarroxavier themonitoringresynchronizationdevicesandcardiacpatientsmorecarerandomizedcontrolledtrialphase1resultsondynamicsofearlyinterventionwithremotemonitoring
AT biffimauro themonitoringresynchronizationdevicesandcardiacpatientsmorecarerandomizedcontrolledtrialphase1resultsondynamicsofearlyinterventionwithremotemonitoring
AT santinimassimo themonitoringresynchronizationdevicesandcardiacpatientsmorecarerandomizedcontrolledtrialphase1resultsondynamicsofearlyinterventionwithremotemonitoring
AT burriharan themonitoringresynchronizationdevicesandcardiacpatientsmorecarerandomizedcontrolledtrialphase1resultsondynamicsofearlyinterventionwithremotemonitoring
AT borianigiuseppe monitoringresynchronizationdevicesandcardiacpatientsmorecarerandomizedcontrolledtrialphase1resultsondynamicsofearlyinterventionwithremotemonitoring
AT dacostaantoine monitoringresynchronizationdevicesandcardiacpatientsmorecarerandomizedcontrolledtrialphase1resultsondynamicsofearlyinterventionwithremotemonitoring
AT riccirenatopietro monitoringresynchronizationdevicesandcardiacpatientsmorecarerandomizedcontrolledtrialphase1resultsondynamicsofearlyinterventionwithremotemonitoring
AT quesadaaurelio monitoringresynchronizationdevicesandcardiacpatientsmorecarerandomizedcontrolledtrialphase1resultsondynamicsofearlyinterventionwithremotemonitoring
AT favalestefano monitoringresynchronizationdevicesandcardiacpatientsmorecarerandomizedcontrolledtrialphase1resultsondynamicsofearlyinterventionwithremotemonitoring
AT iacopinosaverio monitoringresynchronizationdevicesandcardiacpatientsmorecarerandomizedcontrolledtrialphase1resultsondynamicsofearlyinterventionwithremotemonitoring
AT romeofrancesco monitoringresynchronizationdevicesandcardiacpatientsmorecarerandomizedcontrolledtrialphase1resultsondynamicsofearlyinterventionwithremotemonitoring
AT risiarnaldo monitoringresynchronizationdevicesandcardiacpatientsmorecarerandomizedcontrolledtrialphase1resultsondynamicsofearlyinterventionwithremotemonitoring
AT mangonidisstefanolorenza monitoringresynchronizationdevicesandcardiacpatientsmorecarerandomizedcontrolledtrialphase1resultsondynamicsofearlyinterventionwithremotemonitoring
AT navarroxavier monitoringresynchronizationdevicesandcardiacpatientsmorecarerandomizedcontrolledtrialphase1resultsondynamicsofearlyinterventionwithremotemonitoring
AT biffimauro monitoringresynchronizationdevicesandcardiacpatientsmorecarerandomizedcontrolledtrialphase1resultsondynamicsofearlyinterventionwithremotemonitoring
AT santinimassimo monitoringresynchronizationdevicesandcardiacpatientsmorecarerandomizedcontrolledtrialphase1resultsondynamicsofearlyinterventionwithremotemonitoring
AT burriharan monitoringresynchronizationdevicesandcardiacpatientsmorecarerandomizedcontrolledtrialphase1resultsondynamicsofearlyinterventionwithremotemonitoring
_version_ 1721549226666622976