The MOnitoring Resynchronization dEvices and CARdiac patiEnts (MORE-CARE) Randomized Controlled Trial: Phase 1 Results on Dynamics of Early Intervention With Remote Monitoring
BackgroundRemote monitoring (RM) in patients with advanced heart failure and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-D) may reduce delays in clinical decisions by transmitting automatic alerts. However, this strategy has never been tested specifically in this pa...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
JMIR Publications
2013-08-01
|
Series: | Journal of Medical Internet Research |
Online Access: | http://www.jmir.org/2013/8/e167/ |
id |
doaj-fe3d6ece83c94ac083771005519ea3f5 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-fe3d6ece83c94ac083771005519ea3f52021-04-02T19:20:27ZengJMIR PublicationsJournal of Medical Internet Research1438-88712013-08-01158e16710.2196/jmir.2608The MOnitoring Resynchronization dEvices and CARdiac patiEnts (MORE-CARE) Randomized Controlled Trial: Phase 1 Results on Dynamics of Early Intervention With Remote MonitoringBoriani, GiuseppeDa Costa, AntoineRicci, Renato PietroQuesada, AurelioFavale, StefanoIacopino, SaverioRomeo, FrancescoRisi, ArnaldoMangoni di S Stefano, LorenzaNavarro, XavierBiffi, MauroSantini, MassimoBurri, Haran BackgroundRemote monitoring (RM) in patients with advanced heart failure and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-D) may reduce delays in clinical decisions by transmitting automatic alerts. However, this strategy has never been tested specifically in this patient population, with alerts for lung fluid overload, and in a European setting. ObjectiveThe main objective of Phase 1 (presented here) is to evaluate if RM strategy is able to reduce time from device-detected events to clinical decisions. MethodsIn this multicenter randomized controlled trial, patients with moderate to severe heart failure implanted with CRT-D devices were randomized to a Remote group (with remote follow-up and wireless automatic alerts) or to a Control group (with standard follow-up without alerts). The primary endpoint of Phase 1 was the delay between an alert event and clinical decisions related to the event in the first 154 enrolled patients followed for 1 year. ResultsThe median delay from device-detected events to clinical decisions was considerably shorter in the Remote group compared to the Control group: 2 (25th-75th percentile, 1-4) days vs 29 (25th-75th percentile, 3-51) days respectively, P=.004. In-hospital visits were reduced in the Remote group (2.0 visits/patient/year vs 3.2 visits/patient/year in the Control group, 37.5% relative reduction, P<.001). Automatic alerts were successfully transmitted in 93% of events occurring outside the hospital in the Remote group. The annual rate of all-cause hospitalizations per patient did not differ between the two groups (P=.65). ConclusionsRM in CRT-D patients with advanced heart failure allows physicians to promptly react to clinically relevant automatic alerts and significantly reduces the burden of in-hospital visits. Trial RegistrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT00885677; http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00885677 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6IkcCJ7NF).http://www.jmir.org/2013/8/e167/ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Boriani, Giuseppe Da Costa, Antoine Ricci, Renato Pietro Quesada, Aurelio Favale, Stefano Iacopino, Saverio Romeo, Francesco Risi, Arnaldo Mangoni di S Stefano, Lorenza Navarro, Xavier Biffi, Mauro Santini, Massimo Burri, Haran |
spellingShingle |
Boriani, Giuseppe Da Costa, Antoine Ricci, Renato Pietro Quesada, Aurelio Favale, Stefano Iacopino, Saverio Romeo, Francesco Risi, Arnaldo Mangoni di S Stefano, Lorenza Navarro, Xavier Biffi, Mauro Santini, Massimo Burri, Haran The MOnitoring Resynchronization dEvices and CARdiac patiEnts (MORE-CARE) Randomized Controlled Trial: Phase 1 Results on Dynamics of Early Intervention With Remote Monitoring Journal of Medical Internet Research |
author_facet |
Boriani, Giuseppe Da Costa, Antoine Ricci, Renato Pietro Quesada, Aurelio Favale, Stefano Iacopino, Saverio Romeo, Francesco Risi, Arnaldo Mangoni di S Stefano, Lorenza Navarro, Xavier Biffi, Mauro Santini, Massimo Burri, Haran |
author_sort |
Boriani, Giuseppe |
title |
The MOnitoring Resynchronization dEvices and CARdiac patiEnts (MORE-CARE) Randomized Controlled Trial: Phase 1 Results on Dynamics of Early Intervention With Remote Monitoring |
title_short |
The MOnitoring Resynchronization dEvices and CARdiac patiEnts (MORE-CARE) Randomized Controlled Trial: Phase 1 Results on Dynamics of Early Intervention With Remote Monitoring |
title_full |
The MOnitoring Resynchronization dEvices and CARdiac patiEnts (MORE-CARE) Randomized Controlled Trial: Phase 1 Results on Dynamics of Early Intervention With Remote Monitoring |
title_fullStr |
The MOnitoring Resynchronization dEvices and CARdiac patiEnts (MORE-CARE) Randomized Controlled Trial: Phase 1 Results on Dynamics of Early Intervention With Remote Monitoring |
title_full_unstemmed |
The MOnitoring Resynchronization dEvices and CARdiac patiEnts (MORE-CARE) Randomized Controlled Trial: Phase 1 Results on Dynamics of Early Intervention With Remote Monitoring |
title_sort |
monitoring resynchronization devices and cardiac patients (more-care) randomized controlled trial: phase 1 results on dynamics of early intervention with remote monitoring |
publisher |
JMIR Publications |
series |
Journal of Medical Internet Research |
issn |
1438-8871 |
publishDate |
2013-08-01 |
description |
BackgroundRemote monitoring (RM) in patients with advanced heart failure and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-D) may reduce delays in clinical decisions by transmitting automatic alerts. However, this strategy has never been tested specifically in this patient population, with alerts for lung fluid overload, and in a European setting.
ObjectiveThe main objective of Phase 1 (presented here) is to evaluate if RM strategy is able to reduce time from device-detected events to clinical decisions.
MethodsIn this multicenter randomized controlled trial, patients with moderate to severe heart failure implanted with CRT-D devices were randomized to a Remote group (with remote follow-up and wireless automatic alerts) or to a Control group (with standard follow-up without alerts). The primary endpoint of Phase 1 was the delay between an alert event and clinical decisions related to the event in the first 154 enrolled patients followed for 1 year.
ResultsThe median delay from device-detected events to clinical decisions was considerably shorter in the Remote group compared to the Control group: 2 (25th-75th percentile, 1-4) days vs 29 (25th-75th percentile, 3-51) days respectively, P=.004. In-hospital visits were reduced in the Remote group (2.0 visits/patient/year vs 3.2 visits/patient/year in the Control group, 37.5% relative reduction, P<.001). Automatic alerts were successfully transmitted in 93% of events occurring outside the hospital in the Remote group. The annual rate of all-cause hospitalizations per patient did not differ between the two groups (P=.65).
ConclusionsRM in CRT-D patients with advanced heart failure allows physicians to promptly react to clinically relevant automatic alerts and significantly reduces the burden of in-hospital visits.
Trial RegistrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT00885677; http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00885677 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6IkcCJ7NF). |
url |
http://www.jmir.org/2013/8/e167/ |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT borianigiuseppe themonitoringresynchronizationdevicesandcardiacpatientsmorecarerandomizedcontrolledtrialphase1resultsondynamicsofearlyinterventionwithremotemonitoring AT dacostaantoine themonitoringresynchronizationdevicesandcardiacpatientsmorecarerandomizedcontrolledtrialphase1resultsondynamicsofearlyinterventionwithremotemonitoring AT riccirenatopietro themonitoringresynchronizationdevicesandcardiacpatientsmorecarerandomizedcontrolledtrialphase1resultsondynamicsofearlyinterventionwithremotemonitoring AT quesadaaurelio themonitoringresynchronizationdevicesandcardiacpatientsmorecarerandomizedcontrolledtrialphase1resultsondynamicsofearlyinterventionwithremotemonitoring AT favalestefano themonitoringresynchronizationdevicesandcardiacpatientsmorecarerandomizedcontrolledtrialphase1resultsondynamicsofearlyinterventionwithremotemonitoring AT iacopinosaverio themonitoringresynchronizationdevicesandcardiacpatientsmorecarerandomizedcontrolledtrialphase1resultsondynamicsofearlyinterventionwithremotemonitoring AT romeofrancesco themonitoringresynchronizationdevicesandcardiacpatientsmorecarerandomizedcontrolledtrialphase1resultsondynamicsofearlyinterventionwithremotemonitoring AT risiarnaldo themonitoringresynchronizationdevicesandcardiacpatientsmorecarerandomizedcontrolledtrialphase1resultsondynamicsofearlyinterventionwithremotemonitoring AT mangonidisstefanolorenza themonitoringresynchronizationdevicesandcardiacpatientsmorecarerandomizedcontrolledtrialphase1resultsondynamicsofearlyinterventionwithremotemonitoring AT navarroxavier themonitoringresynchronizationdevicesandcardiacpatientsmorecarerandomizedcontrolledtrialphase1resultsondynamicsofearlyinterventionwithremotemonitoring AT biffimauro themonitoringresynchronizationdevicesandcardiacpatientsmorecarerandomizedcontrolledtrialphase1resultsondynamicsofearlyinterventionwithremotemonitoring AT santinimassimo themonitoringresynchronizationdevicesandcardiacpatientsmorecarerandomizedcontrolledtrialphase1resultsondynamicsofearlyinterventionwithremotemonitoring AT burriharan themonitoringresynchronizationdevicesandcardiacpatientsmorecarerandomizedcontrolledtrialphase1resultsondynamicsofearlyinterventionwithremotemonitoring AT borianigiuseppe monitoringresynchronizationdevicesandcardiacpatientsmorecarerandomizedcontrolledtrialphase1resultsondynamicsofearlyinterventionwithremotemonitoring AT dacostaantoine monitoringresynchronizationdevicesandcardiacpatientsmorecarerandomizedcontrolledtrialphase1resultsondynamicsofearlyinterventionwithremotemonitoring AT riccirenatopietro monitoringresynchronizationdevicesandcardiacpatientsmorecarerandomizedcontrolledtrialphase1resultsondynamicsofearlyinterventionwithremotemonitoring AT quesadaaurelio monitoringresynchronizationdevicesandcardiacpatientsmorecarerandomizedcontrolledtrialphase1resultsondynamicsofearlyinterventionwithremotemonitoring AT favalestefano monitoringresynchronizationdevicesandcardiacpatientsmorecarerandomizedcontrolledtrialphase1resultsondynamicsofearlyinterventionwithremotemonitoring AT iacopinosaverio monitoringresynchronizationdevicesandcardiacpatientsmorecarerandomizedcontrolledtrialphase1resultsondynamicsofearlyinterventionwithremotemonitoring AT romeofrancesco monitoringresynchronizationdevicesandcardiacpatientsmorecarerandomizedcontrolledtrialphase1resultsondynamicsofearlyinterventionwithremotemonitoring AT risiarnaldo monitoringresynchronizationdevicesandcardiacpatientsmorecarerandomizedcontrolledtrialphase1resultsondynamicsofearlyinterventionwithremotemonitoring AT mangonidisstefanolorenza monitoringresynchronizationdevicesandcardiacpatientsmorecarerandomizedcontrolledtrialphase1resultsondynamicsofearlyinterventionwithremotemonitoring AT navarroxavier monitoringresynchronizationdevicesandcardiacpatientsmorecarerandomizedcontrolledtrialphase1resultsondynamicsofearlyinterventionwithremotemonitoring AT biffimauro monitoringresynchronizationdevicesandcardiacpatientsmorecarerandomizedcontrolledtrialphase1resultsondynamicsofearlyinterventionwithremotemonitoring AT santinimassimo monitoringresynchronizationdevicesandcardiacpatientsmorecarerandomizedcontrolledtrialphase1resultsondynamicsofearlyinterventionwithremotemonitoring AT burriharan monitoringresynchronizationdevicesandcardiacpatientsmorecarerandomizedcontrolledtrialphase1resultsondynamicsofearlyinterventionwithremotemonitoring |
_version_ |
1721549226666622976 |