Measuring gene expression divergence: the distance to keep

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Gene expression divergence is a phenotypic trait reflecting evolution of gene regulation and characterizing dissimilarity between species and between cells and tissues within the same species. Several distance measures, such as Eucli...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Glazko Galina, Mushegian Arcady
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2010-08-01
Series:Biology Direct
Online Access:http://www.biology-direct.com/content/5/1/51
id doaj-fe210d1b20af4277b3502e908d494b37
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fe210d1b20af4277b3502e908d494b372020-11-24T22:09:47ZengBMCBiology Direct1745-61502010-08-01515110.1186/1745-6150-5-51Measuring gene expression divergence: the distance to keepGlazko GalinaMushegian Arcady<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Gene expression divergence is a phenotypic trait reflecting evolution of gene regulation and characterizing dissimilarity between species and between cells and tissues within the same species. Several distance measures, such as Euclidean and correlation-based distances have been proposed for measuring expression divergence.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We show that different distance measures identify different trends in gene expression patterns. When comparing orthologous genes in eight rat and human tissues, the Euclidean distance identified genes uniformly expressed in all tissues near the expression background as genes with the most conserved expression pattern. In contrast, correlation-based distance and generalized-average distance identified genes with concerted changes among homologous tissues as those most conserved. On the other hand, correlation-based distance, Euclidean distance and generalized-average distance highlight quite well the relatively high similarity of gene expression patterns in homologous tissues between species, compared to non-homologous tissues within species.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Different trends exist in the high-dimensional numeric data, and to highlight a particular trend an appropriate distance measure needs to be chosen. The choice of the distance measure for measuring expression divergence can be dictated by the expression patterns that are of interest in a particular study.</p> <p>Reviewers</p> <p>This article was reviewed by Mikhail Gelfand, Eugene Koonin and Subhajyoti De (nominated by Sarah Teichmann).</p> http://www.biology-direct.com/content/5/1/51
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Glazko Galina
Mushegian Arcady
spellingShingle Glazko Galina
Mushegian Arcady
Measuring gene expression divergence: the distance to keep
Biology Direct
author_facet Glazko Galina
Mushegian Arcady
author_sort Glazko Galina
title Measuring gene expression divergence: the distance to keep
title_short Measuring gene expression divergence: the distance to keep
title_full Measuring gene expression divergence: the distance to keep
title_fullStr Measuring gene expression divergence: the distance to keep
title_full_unstemmed Measuring gene expression divergence: the distance to keep
title_sort measuring gene expression divergence: the distance to keep
publisher BMC
series Biology Direct
issn 1745-6150
publishDate 2010-08-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Gene expression divergence is a phenotypic trait reflecting evolution of gene regulation and characterizing dissimilarity between species and between cells and tissues within the same species. Several distance measures, such as Euclidean and correlation-based distances have been proposed for measuring expression divergence.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We show that different distance measures identify different trends in gene expression patterns. When comparing orthologous genes in eight rat and human tissues, the Euclidean distance identified genes uniformly expressed in all tissues near the expression background as genes with the most conserved expression pattern. In contrast, correlation-based distance and generalized-average distance identified genes with concerted changes among homologous tissues as those most conserved. On the other hand, correlation-based distance, Euclidean distance and generalized-average distance highlight quite well the relatively high similarity of gene expression patterns in homologous tissues between species, compared to non-homologous tissues within species.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Different trends exist in the high-dimensional numeric data, and to highlight a particular trend an appropriate distance measure needs to be chosen. The choice of the distance measure for measuring expression divergence can be dictated by the expression patterns that are of interest in a particular study.</p> <p>Reviewers</p> <p>This article was reviewed by Mikhail Gelfand, Eugene Koonin and Subhajyoti De (nominated by Sarah Teichmann).</p>
url http://www.biology-direct.com/content/5/1/51
work_keys_str_mv AT glazkogalina measuringgeneexpressiondivergencethedistancetokeep
AT mushegianarcady measuringgeneexpressiondivergencethedistancetokeep
_version_ 1725810751874007040