Measuring gene expression divergence: the distance to keep
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Gene expression divergence is a phenotypic trait reflecting evolution of gene regulation and characterizing dissimilarity between species and between cells and tissues within the same species. Several distance measures, such as Eucli...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2010-08-01
|
Series: | Biology Direct |
Online Access: | http://www.biology-direct.com/content/5/1/51 |
id |
doaj-fe210d1b20af4277b3502e908d494b37 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-fe210d1b20af4277b3502e908d494b372020-11-24T22:09:47ZengBMCBiology Direct1745-61502010-08-01515110.1186/1745-6150-5-51Measuring gene expression divergence: the distance to keepGlazko GalinaMushegian Arcady<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Gene expression divergence is a phenotypic trait reflecting evolution of gene regulation and characterizing dissimilarity between species and between cells and tissues within the same species. Several distance measures, such as Euclidean and correlation-based distances have been proposed for measuring expression divergence.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We show that different distance measures identify different trends in gene expression patterns. When comparing orthologous genes in eight rat and human tissues, the Euclidean distance identified genes uniformly expressed in all tissues near the expression background as genes with the most conserved expression pattern. In contrast, correlation-based distance and generalized-average distance identified genes with concerted changes among homologous tissues as those most conserved. On the other hand, correlation-based distance, Euclidean distance and generalized-average distance highlight quite well the relatively high similarity of gene expression patterns in homologous tissues between species, compared to non-homologous tissues within species.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Different trends exist in the high-dimensional numeric data, and to highlight a particular trend an appropriate distance measure needs to be chosen. The choice of the distance measure for measuring expression divergence can be dictated by the expression patterns that are of interest in a particular study.</p> <p>Reviewers</p> <p>This article was reviewed by Mikhail Gelfand, Eugene Koonin and Subhajyoti De (nominated by Sarah Teichmann).</p> http://www.biology-direct.com/content/5/1/51 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Glazko Galina Mushegian Arcady |
spellingShingle |
Glazko Galina Mushegian Arcady Measuring gene expression divergence: the distance to keep Biology Direct |
author_facet |
Glazko Galina Mushegian Arcady |
author_sort |
Glazko Galina |
title |
Measuring gene expression divergence: the distance to keep |
title_short |
Measuring gene expression divergence: the distance to keep |
title_full |
Measuring gene expression divergence: the distance to keep |
title_fullStr |
Measuring gene expression divergence: the distance to keep |
title_full_unstemmed |
Measuring gene expression divergence: the distance to keep |
title_sort |
measuring gene expression divergence: the distance to keep |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Biology Direct |
issn |
1745-6150 |
publishDate |
2010-08-01 |
description |
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Gene expression divergence is a phenotypic trait reflecting evolution of gene regulation and characterizing dissimilarity between species and between cells and tissues within the same species. Several distance measures, such as Euclidean and correlation-based distances have been proposed for measuring expression divergence.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We show that different distance measures identify different trends in gene expression patterns. When comparing orthologous genes in eight rat and human tissues, the Euclidean distance identified genes uniformly expressed in all tissues near the expression background as genes with the most conserved expression pattern. In contrast, correlation-based distance and generalized-average distance identified genes with concerted changes among homologous tissues as those most conserved. On the other hand, correlation-based distance, Euclidean distance and generalized-average distance highlight quite well the relatively high similarity of gene expression patterns in homologous tissues between species, compared to non-homologous tissues within species.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Different trends exist in the high-dimensional numeric data, and to highlight a particular trend an appropriate distance measure needs to be chosen. The choice of the distance measure for measuring expression divergence can be dictated by the expression patterns that are of interest in a particular study.</p> <p>Reviewers</p> <p>This article was reviewed by Mikhail Gelfand, Eugene Koonin and Subhajyoti De (nominated by Sarah Teichmann).</p> |
url |
http://www.biology-direct.com/content/5/1/51 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT glazkogalina measuringgeneexpressiondivergencethedistancetokeep AT mushegianarcady measuringgeneexpressiondivergencethedistancetokeep |
_version_ |
1725810751874007040 |