Von und durch Neid erzählen. Rhetoriken des Neids in Konrads <i>Engelhard</i>

In academic debates of the 12<sup>th</sup> and 13<sup>th</sup> centuries, accusing one’s opponent of envy became a widespread feature. In the tradition of Roman literature, which connected <em>virtus</em> and <em>invidia</em>, the envy-reproach device...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Eva Lieberich
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Bergische Universität Wuppertal 2016-12-01
Series:Diegesis: Interdisziplinäres E-Journal für Erzählforschung
Online Access:https://www.diegesis.uni-wuppertal.de/index.php/diegesis/article/view/250
id doaj-fe193c48fa5d4967b4a26d9009d4725b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fe193c48fa5d4967b4a26d9009d4725b2020-11-25T02:21:03ZdeuBergische Universität WuppertalDiegesis: Interdisziplinäres E-Journal für Erzählforschung2195-21162016-12-0152262Von und durch Neid erzählen. Rhetoriken des Neids in Konrads <i>Engelhard</i>Eva LieberichIn academic debates of the 12<sup>th</sup> and 13<sup>th</sup> centuries, accusing one’s opponent of envy became a widespread feature. In the tradition of Roman literature, which connected <em>virtus</em> and <em>invidia</em>, the envy-reproach device was used to discredit critics as well as to strengthen one’s own position in intellectual discussions. This ‘rhetoric of envy’ was soon taken up in vernacular literature. Existing research has shown that envy was invoked in prologues and epilogues as a means for an author to secure a favorable reception of his work. This essay argues that envy was also used to direct the reader’s understanding of the <em>histoire</em>. By examining how and when the narrator talks about envy in Konrad’s Engelhard, I aim to show that envy reshapes the ethics of the narrative: In the trial scene, truthful accusations are transformed into envious speech acts. Envy shifts attention from the transgression of the protagonist to the moral failure of the antagonist. To conclude, I suggest the wider relevance of this special form of strategic narration by comparing Engelhard with other texts that involve the trial of a protagonist.https://www.diegesis.uni-wuppertal.de/index.php/diegesis/article/view/250
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Eva Lieberich
spellingShingle Eva Lieberich
Von und durch Neid erzählen. Rhetoriken des Neids in Konrads <i>Engelhard</i>
Diegesis: Interdisziplinäres E-Journal für Erzählforschung
author_facet Eva Lieberich
author_sort Eva Lieberich
title Von und durch Neid erzählen. Rhetoriken des Neids in Konrads <i>Engelhard</i>
title_short Von und durch Neid erzählen. Rhetoriken des Neids in Konrads <i>Engelhard</i>
title_full Von und durch Neid erzählen. Rhetoriken des Neids in Konrads <i>Engelhard</i>
title_fullStr Von und durch Neid erzählen. Rhetoriken des Neids in Konrads <i>Engelhard</i>
title_full_unstemmed Von und durch Neid erzählen. Rhetoriken des Neids in Konrads <i>Engelhard</i>
title_sort von und durch neid erzählen. rhetoriken des neids in konrads <i>engelhard</i>
publisher Bergische Universität Wuppertal
series Diegesis: Interdisziplinäres E-Journal für Erzählforschung
issn 2195-2116
publishDate 2016-12-01
description In academic debates of the 12<sup>th</sup> and 13<sup>th</sup> centuries, accusing one’s opponent of envy became a widespread feature. In the tradition of Roman literature, which connected <em>virtus</em> and <em>invidia</em>, the envy-reproach device was used to discredit critics as well as to strengthen one’s own position in intellectual discussions. This ‘rhetoric of envy’ was soon taken up in vernacular literature. Existing research has shown that envy was invoked in prologues and epilogues as a means for an author to secure a favorable reception of his work. This essay argues that envy was also used to direct the reader’s understanding of the <em>histoire</em>. By examining how and when the narrator talks about envy in Konrad’s Engelhard, I aim to show that envy reshapes the ethics of the narrative: In the trial scene, truthful accusations are transformed into envious speech acts. Envy shifts attention from the transgression of the protagonist to the moral failure of the antagonist. To conclude, I suggest the wider relevance of this special form of strategic narration by comparing Engelhard with other texts that involve the trial of a protagonist.
url https://www.diegesis.uni-wuppertal.de/index.php/diegesis/article/view/250
work_keys_str_mv AT evalieberich vonunddurchneiderzahlenrhetorikendesneidsinkonradsiengelhardi
_version_ 1724867897637994496