Feeding behaviour, digestibility, energy balance and productive performance of lactating goats fed forage-based and forage-free diets

Six lactating Saanen goats have been used in a Latin Square design to evaluate a grass-based diet (G), a hay-based diet<br />(H) and a nonforage diet (NF). On dry matter, grass and hay contributed for 55% of the diets and had 13.7 and 16.1%<br />CP, 55.4 and 49.4% NDF, 38.0 and 31.6% ADF...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gianni Matteo Crovetto, Alberto Tamburini, Luciana Bava, Luca Rapetti
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2010-01-01
Series:Italian Journal of Animal Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.aspajournal.it/index.php/ijas/article/view/228
id doaj-fe16779c4c5e4a0ba50c3841a88ef110
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fe16779c4c5e4a0ba50c3841a88ef1102020-11-24T21:48:01ZengTaylor & Francis GroupItalian Journal of Animal Science1594-40771828-051X2010-01-0141718310.4081/ijas.2005.71Feeding behaviour, digestibility, energy balance and productive performance of lactating goats fed forage-based and forage-free dietsGianni Matteo CrovettoAlberto TamburiniLuciana BavaLuca RapettiSix lactating Saanen goats have been used in a Latin Square design to evaluate a grass-based diet (G), a hay-based diet<br />(H) and a nonforage diet (NF). On dry matter, grass and hay contributed for 55% of the diets and had 13.7 and 16.1%<br />CP, 55.4 and 49.4% NDF, 38.0 and 31.6% ADF, respectively. Diet NF had beet pulp, cracked carob beans and whole cottonseed<br />as main ingredients, with more than 75% of the particles greater than 2 mm.<br />Independently of the dietary treatment, the goats spent more time eating than ruminating. Diet NF proved to be effective<br />in stimulating chewing activity, despite a trend for a lower chewing activity for eating (178, 185, 125 min/kg DMI<br />for diets G, H and NF, respectively), but not for ruminating (84, 80, 80 min/kg DMI for diets G, H and NF, respectively).<br />Feed intake did not differ among diets, while regarding digestibility diet NF had the highest values for DM (74.1%), OM<br />(75.7%) and non-fibrous carbohydrates (92.0%), but the lowest for ADF (44.5%). For treatments G, H and NF milk yields<br />were 3011, 3688 and 3212 g/d (P<0.05 between H and G), while milk fat and protein were respectively 3.37, 3.24,<br />2.96% (P<0.05 between G and NF) and 3.11, 3.32, 3.29%. Milk urea N was lower for diet NF (18.8, 18.6, 12.7 mg/100<br />ml, P<0.001). Diet NF increased the concentration of the short chain fatty acids of milk fat and decreased the content of<br />C18:0, C18:1 and C18:3 in comparison to the other two diets. No difference among treatments was recorded for CLA.<br />Intake energy was digested to a lesser extent for diet G (68.9, 70.0, 72.7%, P<0.05 between G and NF) due to its poor<br />quality forage. Urinary energy losses reflected the corresponding protein contents of the diets, while no difference was<br />recorded for methane production. ME resulted higher for diet NF (60.0, 60.7, 65.1% of the intake energy, P<0.01), while<br />heat production and milk energy yield were similar in the three treatments. Diet NF had a higher ME content (11.13,<br />11.26, 11.93 MJ/kg DM, P<0.05), while no significant difference among the diets was recorded in terms of kl (0.64, 0.70,<br />0.69) and NEl (7.20, 7.93, 8.30 MJ/kg DM).<br />It is concluded from the study that a nonforage diet with an adequate amount of structured fibre could substitute a ration<br />based on poor quality forage in lactating goats; however, good forage seems to enhance milk performance to a greater<br />extent.http://www.aspajournal.it/index.php/ijas/article/view/228Goat, Nonforage diet, Chewing activity, Energy balance, Milk
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gianni Matteo Crovetto
Alberto Tamburini
Luciana Bava
Luca Rapetti
spellingShingle Gianni Matteo Crovetto
Alberto Tamburini
Luciana Bava
Luca Rapetti
Feeding behaviour, digestibility, energy balance and productive performance of lactating goats fed forage-based and forage-free diets
Italian Journal of Animal Science
Goat, Nonforage diet, Chewing activity, Energy balance, Milk
author_facet Gianni Matteo Crovetto
Alberto Tamburini
Luciana Bava
Luca Rapetti
author_sort Gianni Matteo Crovetto
title Feeding behaviour, digestibility, energy balance and productive performance of lactating goats fed forage-based and forage-free diets
title_short Feeding behaviour, digestibility, energy balance and productive performance of lactating goats fed forage-based and forage-free diets
title_full Feeding behaviour, digestibility, energy balance and productive performance of lactating goats fed forage-based and forage-free diets
title_fullStr Feeding behaviour, digestibility, energy balance and productive performance of lactating goats fed forage-based and forage-free diets
title_full_unstemmed Feeding behaviour, digestibility, energy balance and productive performance of lactating goats fed forage-based and forage-free diets
title_sort feeding behaviour, digestibility, energy balance and productive performance of lactating goats fed forage-based and forage-free diets
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Italian Journal of Animal Science
issn 1594-4077
1828-051X
publishDate 2010-01-01
description Six lactating Saanen goats have been used in a Latin Square design to evaluate a grass-based diet (G), a hay-based diet<br />(H) and a nonforage diet (NF). On dry matter, grass and hay contributed for 55% of the diets and had 13.7 and 16.1%<br />CP, 55.4 and 49.4% NDF, 38.0 and 31.6% ADF, respectively. Diet NF had beet pulp, cracked carob beans and whole cottonseed<br />as main ingredients, with more than 75% of the particles greater than 2 mm.<br />Independently of the dietary treatment, the goats spent more time eating than ruminating. Diet NF proved to be effective<br />in stimulating chewing activity, despite a trend for a lower chewing activity for eating (178, 185, 125 min/kg DMI<br />for diets G, H and NF, respectively), but not for ruminating (84, 80, 80 min/kg DMI for diets G, H and NF, respectively).<br />Feed intake did not differ among diets, while regarding digestibility diet NF had the highest values for DM (74.1%), OM<br />(75.7%) and non-fibrous carbohydrates (92.0%), but the lowest for ADF (44.5%). For treatments G, H and NF milk yields<br />were 3011, 3688 and 3212 g/d (P<0.05 between H and G), while milk fat and protein were respectively 3.37, 3.24,<br />2.96% (P<0.05 between G and NF) and 3.11, 3.32, 3.29%. Milk urea N was lower for diet NF (18.8, 18.6, 12.7 mg/100<br />ml, P<0.001). Diet NF increased the concentration of the short chain fatty acids of milk fat and decreased the content of<br />C18:0, C18:1 and C18:3 in comparison to the other two diets. No difference among treatments was recorded for CLA.<br />Intake energy was digested to a lesser extent for diet G (68.9, 70.0, 72.7%, P<0.05 between G and NF) due to its poor<br />quality forage. Urinary energy losses reflected the corresponding protein contents of the diets, while no difference was<br />recorded for methane production. ME resulted higher for diet NF (60.0, 60.7, 65.1% of the intake energy, P<0.01), while<br />heat production and milk energy yield were similar in the three treatments. Diet NF had a higher ME content (11.13,<br />11.26, 11.93 MJ/kg DM, P<0.05), while no significant difference among the diets was recorded in terms of kl (0.64, 0.70,<br />0.69) and NEl (7.20, 7.93, 8.30 MJ/kg DM).<br />It is concluded from the study that a nonforage diet with an adequate amount of structured fibre could substitute a ration<br />based on poor quality forage in lactating goats; however, good forage seems to enhance milk performance to a greater<br />extent.
topic Goat, Nonforage diet, Chewing activity, Energy balance, Milk
url http://www.aspajournal.it/index.php/ijas/article/view/228
work_keys_str_mv AT giannimatteocrovetto feedingbehaviourdigestibilityenergybalanceandproductiveperformanceoflactatinggoatsfedforagebasedandforagefreediets
AT albertotamburini feedingbehaviourdigestibilityenergybalanceandproductiveperformanceoflactatinggoatsfedforagebasedandforagefreediets
AT lucianabava feedingbehaviourdigestibilityenergybalanceandproductiveperformanceoflactatinggoatsfedforagebasedandforagefreediets
AT lucarapetti feedingbehaviourdigestibilityenergybalanceandproductiveperformanceoflactatinggoatsfedforagebasedandforagefreediets
_version_ 1725893899197612032