Intermittent vs. continuous vancomycin infusion for gram-positive infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Objective: The clinical use of intermittent infusion of vancomycin (IIV) and continuous infusion of vancomycin (CIV) is controversial. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of IIV and CIV by using a meta-analysis for cohort studies and randomized controlled trials. Methods...
Main Authors: | Yang Chu, Yifan Luo, Xiaowei Quan, Mingyan Jiang, Baosen Zhou |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2020-04-01
|
Series: | Journal of Infection and Public Health |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876034119303016 |
Similar Items
-
Population pharmacokinetics of vancomycin in Chinese patients with augmented renal clearance
by: Yang Chu, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01) -
Comparison of intermittent versus continuous-infusion vancomycin for treating severe patients in intensive care units
by: Carolina Hikari Yamada, et al.
Published: (2020-07-01) -
Efficacy and Safety of Continuous Infusion of Vancomycin in Children: A Systematic Review
by: Marta Alonso-Moreno, et al.
Published: (2021-07-01) -
A Meta-Analysis of Comparing Intermittent Epidural Boluses and Continuous Epidural Infusion for Labor Analgesia
by: I-Shiang Tzeng, et al.
Published: (2020-09-01) -
Clinical outcomes of prolonged infusion (extended infusion or continuous infusion) versus intermittent bolus of meropenem in severe infection: A meta-analysis.
by: Zhenwei Yu, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01)