Rasch analysis of the Herth Hope Index in cancer patients

Abstract Background The concept of hope has been measured using the Herth Hope Index (HHI) in different samples, but varying factor structures comprising different items from the HHI have been reported. Therefore, further testing with regard to the dimensionality of the instrument is recommended. Ra...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tone Rustøen, Anners Lerdal, Caryl Gay, Anders Kottorp
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-10-01
Series:Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12955-018-1025-5
id doaj-fe0a792bb43941c59ab111ca783e6119
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fe0a792bb43941c59ab111ca783e61192020-11-25T01:32:13ZengBMCHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes1477-75252018-10-0116111010.1186/s12955-018-1025-5Rasch analysis of the Herth Hope Index in cancer patientsTone Rustøen0Anners Lerdal1Caryl Gay2Anders Kottorp3Department of Nursing Science, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of OsloDepartment of Nursing Science, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of OsloDepartment for Patient Safety and Research, Lovisenberg Diakonale HospitalFaculty of Health and Society, Malmö UniversityAbstract Background The concept of hope has been measured using the Herth Hope Index (HHI) in different samples, but varying factor structures comprising different items from the HHI have been reported. Therefore, further testing with regard to the dimensionality of the instrument is recommended. Rasch modeling can be used to evaluate validity evidence of an instrument’s underlying structure, to identify items with poor fit to the rest of the scale, and to identify items that perform inconsistently across groups. The aim of this study was to assess the HHI’s psychometric properties in a sample of cancer patients using a Rasch model. Adult oncology outpatients (n = 167) with pain from bone metastasis were included, and medical records were reviewed for disease and treatment information. Patients completed the 12-item HHI, which measures various dimensions of hope using a 4-point Likert scale that ranges from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). The internal scale validity, person response validity, unidimensionality, and uniform differential item functioning were evaluated by applying a Rasch rating scale model. Results Five (42%) of the twelve items (#3, #4, #5, #6 and #7) did not meet the criterion set for item goodness-of-fit. After removing these 5 items, the resulting 7-item scale demonstrated acceptable item fit to the model, acceptable unidimensionality (52.6% of the variance explained), acceptable person goodness-of-fit, adequate separation, and no differential item function. Conclusion A 7-item version of the HHI had better psychometric properties than the original 12-item version among patients with cancer-related pain. Trial registration The protocol ID is 158,707/V10 and it was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT00760305. Registered September 25, 2008.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12955-018-1025-5
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tone Rustøen
Anners Lerdal
Caryl Gay
Anders Kottorp
spellingShingle Tone Rustøen
Anners Lerdal
Caryl Gay
Anders Kottorp
Rasch analysis of the Herth Hope Index in cancer patients
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
author_facet Tone Rustøen
Anners Lerdal
Caryl Gay
Anders Kottorp
author_sort Tone Rustøen
title Rasch analysis of the Herth Hope Index in cancer patients
title_short Rasch analysis of the Herth Hope Index in cancer patients
title_full Rasch analysis of the Herth Hope Index in cancer patients
title_fullStr Rasch analysis of the Herth Hope Index in cancer patients
title_full_unstemmed Rasch analysis of the Herth Hope Index in cancer patients
title_sort rasch analysis of the herth hope index in cancer patients
publisher BMC
series Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
issn 1477-7525
publishDate 2018-10-01
description Abstract Background The concept of hope has been measured using the Herth Hope Index (HHI) in different samples, but varying factor structures comprising different items from the HHI have been reported. Therefore, further testing with regard to the dimensionality of the instrument is recommended. Rasch modeling can be used to evaluate validity evidence of an instrument’s underlying structure, to identify items with poor fit to the rest of the scale, and to identify items that perform inconsistently across groups. The aim of this study was to assess the HHI’s psychometric properties in a sample of cancer patients using a Rasch model. Adult oncology outpatients (n = 167) with pain from bone metastasis were included, and medical records were reviewed for disease and treatment information. Patients completed the 12-item HHI, which measures various dimensions of hope using a 4-point Likert scale that ranges from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). The internal scale validity, person response validity, unidimensionality, and uniform differential item functioning were evaluated by applying a Rasch rating scale model. Results Five (42%) of the twelve items (#3, #4, #5, #6 and #7) did not meet the criterion set for item goodness-of-fit. After removing these 5 items, the resulting 7-item scale demonstrated acceptable item fit to the model, acceptable unidimensionality (52.6% of the variance explained), acceptable person goodness-of-fit, adequate separation, and no differential item function. Conclusion A 7-item version of the HHI had better psychometric properties than the original 12-item version among patients with cancer-related pain. Trial registration The protocol ID is 158,707/V10 and it was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT00760305. Registered September 25, 2008.
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12955-018-1025-5
work_keys_str_mv AT tonerustøen raschanalysisoftheherthhopeindexincancerpatients
AT annerslerdal raschanalysisoftheherthhopeindexincancerpatients
AT carylgay raschanalysisoftheherthhopeindexincancerpatients
AT anderskottorp raschanalysisoftheherthhopeindexincancerpatients
_version_ 1725082467049668608