Melanosis Coli: A Helpful Contrast Effect or a Harmful Pigmentation?

Background: Melanosis coli, a brown discoloration of colonic mucosa, is considered as a benign condition mainly observed in patients under chronic anthranoid laxatives. Recent data link this condition with an increased adenoma detection rate. Moreover, its tumorigenic potential and possible associat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fadi Abu Baker, Amir Mari, Dan Feldman, Muhammad Suki, Oren Gal, Yael Kopelman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2018-12-01
Series:Clinical Medicine Insights: Gastroenterology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1179552218817321
id doaj-fe015ea36ffa4e3fbda396a938f30f83
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fe015ea36ffa4e3fbda396a938f30f832020-11-25T02:18:19ZengSAGE PublishingClinical Medicine Insights: Gastroenterology1179-55222018-12-011110.1177/1179552218817321Melanosis Coli: A Helpful Contrast Effect or a Harmful Pigmentation?Fadi Abu BakerAmir MariDan FeldmanMuhammad SukiOren GalYael KopelmanBackground: Melanosis coli, a brown discoloration of colonic mucosa, is considered as a benign condition mainly observed in patients under chronic anthranoid laxatives. Recent data link this condition with an increased adenoma detection rate. Moreover, its tumorigenic potential and possible association with the development of colorectal cancer remains uncertain. We conducted this study to compare the polyp detection rate and colorectal cancer diagnosis in patients with melanosis against matched control group without melanosis. Patients and methods: A retrospective single-center study. Patients diagnosed with melanosis coli on colonoscopy over a 15-year period were included. Each melanosis coli patient was matched with three controls by age, gender, setting (inpatient/outpatient), and procedure’s indication. Polyp detection rate and diagnosis of colorectal cancer were recorded and compared between the groups before and after adjustment for bowel preparation. Results: A cohort of 718 patients with melanosis and 2154 controls were included. The polyp detection rates were 33.4% and 21.8% of melanosis and control groups, respectively ( P  < .001). Melanosis coli, however, was associated with less diagnosis of colorectal cancer than controls (0.3% vs 3.9%; P  < .001). In multivariate analysis, melanosis diagnosis on endoscopy was significantly associated with higher polyp detection rate (odds ratio [OR] = 1.986, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.626-2.425; P value < .01). Conclusions: Melanosis coli is not associated with increased diagnosis of colorectal cancer. It is associated, however, with enhanced polyp detection likely due to chromo-endoscopy-like effect.https://doi.org/10.1177/1179552218817321
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Fadi Abu Baker
Amir Mari
Dan Feldman
Muhammad Suki
Oren Gal
Yael Kopelman
spellingShingle Fadi Abu Baker
Amir Mari
Dan Feldman
Muhammad Suki
Oren Gal
Yael Kopelman
Melanosis Coli: A Helpful Contrast Effect or a Harmful Pigmentation?
Clinical Medicine Insights: Gastroenterology
author_facet Fadi Abu Baker
Amir Mari
Dan Feldman
Muhammad Suki
Oren Gal
Yael Kopelman
author_sort Fadi Abu Baker
title Melanosis Coli: A Helpful Contrast Effect or a Harmful Pigmentation?
title_short Melanosis Coli: A Helpful Contrast Effect or a Harmful Pigmentation?
title_full Melanosis Coli: A Helpful Contrast Effect or a Harmful Pigmentation?
title_fullStr Melanosis Coli: A Helpful Contrast Effect or a Harmful Pigmentation?
title_full_unstemmed Melanosis Coli: A Helpful Contrast Effect or a Harmful Pigmentation?
title_sort melanosis coli: a helpful contrast effect or a harmful pigmentation?
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Clinical Medicine Insights: Gastroenterology
issn 1179-5522
publishDate 2018-12-01
description Background: Melanosis coli, a brown discoloration of colonic mucosa, is considered as a benign condition mainly observed in patients under chronic anthranoid laxatives. Recent data link this condition with an increased adenoma detection rate. Moreover, its tumorigenic potential and possible association with the development of colorectal cancer remains uncertain. We conducted this study to compare the polyp detection rate and colorectal cancer diagnosis in patients with melanosis against matched control group without melanosis. Patients and methods: A retrospective single-center study. Patients diagnosed with melanosis coli on colonoscopy over a 15-year period were included. Each melanosis coli patient was matched with three controls by age, gender, setting (inpatient/outpatient), and procedure’s indication. Polyp detection rate and diagnosis of colorectal cancer were recorded and compared between the groups before and after adjustment for bowel preparation. Results: A cohort of 718 patients with melanosis and 2154 controls were included. The polyp detection rates were 33.4% and 21.8% of melanosis and control groups, respectively ( P  < .001). Melanosis coli, however, was associated with less diagnosis of colorectal cancer than controls (0.3% vs 3.9%; P  < .001). In multivariate analysis, melanosis diagnosis on endoscopy was significantly associated with higher polyp detection rate (odds ratio [OR] = 1.986, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.626-2.425; P value < .01). Conclusions: Melanosis coli is not associated with increased diagnosis of colorectal cancer. It is associated, however, with enhanced polyp detection likely due to chromo-endoscopy-like effect.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1179552218817321
work_keys_str_mv AT fadiabubaker melanosiscoliahelpfulcontrasteffectoraharmfulpigmentation
AT amirmari melanosiscoliahelpfulcontrasteffectoraharmfulpigmentation
AT danfeldman melanosiscoliahelpfulcontrasteffectoraharmfulpigmentation
AT muhammadsuki melanosiscoliahelpfulcontrasteffectoraharmfulpigmentation
AT orengal melanosiscoliahelpfulcontrasteffectoraharmfulpigmentation
AT yaelkopelman melanosiscoliahelpfulcontrasteffectoraharmfulpigmentation
_version_ 1724882905158647808