Faith, Reason and Theology on Biblical Historicity

Research regarding historical background and literary composition of biblical writings during the last decades has followed an independent path and has been done outside of theology. The methodologies used within the academic world and the results reached so far, pose challenges to theologians and c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Francisco Varo Pineda
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana 2019-10-01
Series:Cuestiones Teológicas
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revistas.upb.edu.co/index.php/cuestiones/article/view/9231
id doaj-fdfabae7d04048abab9cfaa9f0a288c7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fdfabae7d04048abab9cfaa9f0a288c72020-11-25T01:30:46ZspaUniversidad Pontificia BolivarianaCuestiones Teológicas0120-131X2389-99802019-10-014610624327110.18566/cueteo.v46n106.a037750Faith, Reason and Theology on Biblical HistoricityFrancisco Varo Pineda0Universidad de NavarraResearch regarding historical background and literary composition of biblical writings during the last decades has followed an independent path and has been done outside of theology. The methodologies used within the academic world and the results reached so far, pose challenges to theologians and clergymen regarding the identification of the actual achievements and limitations of such researches. Bearing this in mind, the article presents some considerations regarding the findings of those researches in order to outline some practical recommendations for biblical research and the teaching of theology. After reviewing the contributions of the most relevant researchers of “independent histories” of ancient Israel and those that could be labeled as the “third search” for historical Jesus, the emergence of some agreements is established, as well as the limitations of some methodological assumptions that, by accepting only what common human experience could prove, exclude some higher-order realities or present Jesus as a figure that cannot be either Christ or son of God. The conclusion is that a reasonable balanced should be encouraged. On the one hand, a healthy openness towards the possibility that some events have taken place that, because of their own nature, cannot be proved empirically. On the other, preventing to present as facts what are literal readings of the biblical writing.https://revistas.upb.edu.co/index.php/cuestiones/article/view/9231historia de israelantiguo testamentojesús históriconuevo testamentointerpretación bíblica.
collection DOAJ
language Spanish
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Francisco Varo Pineda
spellingShingle Francisco Varo Pineda
Faith, Reason and Theology on Biblical Historicity
Cuestiones Teológicas
historia de israel
antiguo testamento
jesús histórico
nuevo testamento
interpretación bíblica.
author_facet Francisco Varo Pineda
author_sort Francisco Varo Pineda
title Faith, Reason and Theology on Biblical Historicity
title_short Faith, Reason and Theology on Biblical Historicity
title_full Faith, Reason and Theology on Biblical Historicity
title_fullStr Faith, Reason and Theology on Biblical Historicity
title_full_unstemmed Faith, Reason and Theology on Biblical Historicity
title_sort faith, reason and theology on biblical historicity
publisher Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana
series Cuestiones Teológicas
issn 0120-131X
2389-9980
publishDate 2019-10-01
description Research regarding historical background and literary composition of biblical writings during the last decades has followed an independent path and has been done outside of theology. The methodologies used within the academic world and the results reached so far, pose challenges to theologians and clergymen regarding the identification of the actual achievements and limitations of such researches. Bearing this in mind, the article presents some considerations regarding the findings of those researches in order to outline some practical recommendations for biblical research and the teaching of theology. After reviewing the contributions of the most relevant researchers of “independent histories” of ancient Israel and those that could be labeled as the “third search” for historical Jesus, the emergence of some agreements is established, as well as the limitations of some methodological assumptions that, by accepting only what common human experience could prove, exclude some higher-order realities or present Jesus as a figure that cannot be either Christ or son of God. The conclusion is that a reasonable balanced should be encouraged. On the one hand, a healthy openness towards the possibility that some events have taken place that, because of their own nature, cannot be proved empirically. On the other, preventing to present as facts what are literal readings of the biblical writing.
topic historia de israel
antiguo testamento
jesús histórico
nuevo testamento
interpretación bíblica.
url https://revistas.upb.edu.co/index.php/cuestiones/article/view/9231
work_keys_str_mv AT franciscovaropineda faithreasonandtheologyonbiblicalhistoricity
_version_ 1725090039485956096