Faith, Reason and Theology on Biblical Historicity
Research regarding historical background and literary composition of biblical writings during the last decades has followed an independent path and has been done outside of theology. The methodologies used within the academic world and the results reached so far, pose challenges to theologians and c...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Spanish |
Published: |
Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana
2019-10-01
|
Series: | Cuestiones Teológicas |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://revistas.upb.edu.co/index.php/cuestiones/article/view/9231 |
id |
doaj-fdfabae7d04048abab9cfaa9f0a288c7 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-fdfabae7d04048abab9cfaa9f0a288c72020-11-25T01:30:46ZspaUniversidad Pontificia BolivarianaCuestiones Teológicas0120-131X2389-99802019-10-014610624327110.18566/cueteo.v46n106.a037750Faith, Reason and Theology on Biblical HistoricityFrancisco Varo Pineda0Universidad de NavarraResearch regarding historical background and literary composition of biblical writings during the last decades has followed an independent path and has been done outside of theology. The methodologies used within the academic world and the results reached so far, pose challenges to theologians and clergymen regarding the identification of the actual achievements and limitations of such researches. Bearing this in mind, the article presents some considerations regarding the findings of those researches in order to outline some practical recommendations for biblical research and the teaching of theology. After reviewing the contributions of the most relevant researchers of “independent histories” of ancient Israel and those that could be labeled as the “third search” for historical Jesus, the emergence of some agreements is established, as well as the limitations of some methodological assumptions that, by accepting only what common human experience could prove, exclude some higher-order realities or present Jesus as a figure that cannot be either Christ or son of God. The conclusion is that a reasonable balanced should be encouraged. On the one hand, a healthy openness towards the possibility that some events have taken place that, because of their own nature, cannot be proved empirically. On the other, preventing to present as facts what are literal readings of the biblical writing.https://revistas.upb.edu.co/index.php/cuestiones/article/view/9231historia de israelantiguo testamentojesús históriconuevo testamentointerpretación bíblica. |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Spanish |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Francisco Varo Pineda |
spellingShingle |
Francisco Varo Pineda Faith, Reason and Theology on Biblical Historicity Cuestiones Teológicas historia de israel antiguo testamento jesús histórico nuevo testamento interpretación bíblica. |
author_facet |
Francisco Varo Pineda |
author_sort |
Francisco Varo Pineda |
title |
Faith, Reason and Theology on Biblical Historicity |
title_short |
Faith, Reason and Theology on Biblical Historicity |
title_full |
Faith, Reason and Theology on Biblical Historicity |
title_fullStr |
Faith, Reason and Theology on Biblical Historicity |
title_full_unstemmed |
Faith, Reason and Theology on Biblical Historicity |
title_sort |
faith, reason and theology on biblical historicity |
publisher |
Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana |
series |
Cuestiones Teológicas |
issn |
0120-131X 2389-9980 |
publishDate |
2019-10-01 |
description |
Research regarding historical background and literary composition of biblical writings during the last decades has followed an independent path and has been done outside of theology. The methodologies used within the academic world and the results reached so far, pose challenges to theologians and clergymen regarding the identification of the actual achievements and limitations of such researches. Bearing this in mind, the article presents some considerations regarding the findings of those researches in order to outline some practical recommendations for biblical research and the teaching of theology. After reviewing the contributions of the most relevant researchers of “independent histories” of ancient Israel and those that could be labeled as the “third search” for historical Jesus, the emergence of some agreements is established, as well as the limitations of some methodological assumptions that, by accepting only what common human experience could prove, exclude some higher-order realities or present Jesus as a figure that cannot be either Christ or son of God. The conclusion is that a reasonable balanced should be encouraged. On the one hand, a healthy openness towards the possibility that some events have taken place that, because of their own nature, cannot be proved empirically. On the other, preventing to present as facts what are literal readings of the biblical writing. |
topic |
historia de israel antiguo testamento jesús histórico nuevo testamento interpretación bíblica. |
url |
https://revistas.upb.edu.co/index.php/cuestiones/article/view/9231 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT franciscovaropineda faithreasonandtheologyonbiblicalhistoricity |
_version_ |
1725090039485956096 |