A small climate-amplifying effect of climate-carbon cycle feedback
How to curb climate change is uncertain, in part because determination of allowable emissions depends on models with low accuracy. Here the authors re-analyze climate-carbon feedbacks and find that CO2 emissions could be 9 ± 7% higher and still meet Paris Agreement goals.
Main Authors: | Xuanze Zhang, Ying-Ping Wang, Peter J. Rayner, Philippe Ciais, Kun Huang, Yiqi Luo, Shilong Piao, Zhonglei Wang, Jianyang Xia, Wei Zhao, Xiaogu Zheng, Jing Tian, Yongqiang Zhang |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nature Publishing Group
2021-05-01
|
Series: | Nature Communications |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22392-w |
Similar Items
-
The African contribution to the global climate-carbon cycle feedback of the 21st century
by: P. Friedlingstein, et al.
Published: (2010-02-01) -
Seasonal Responses of Terrestrial Carbon Cycle to Climate Variations in CMIP5 Models: Evaluation and Projection
by: Liu, Yongwen, et al.
Published: (2017) -
Greenhouse Gas Concentration and Volcanic Eruptions Controlled the Variability of Terrestrial Carbon Uptake Over the Last Millennium
by: Xuanze Zhang, et al.
Published: (2019-06-01) -
Model structures amplify uncertainty in predicted soil carbon responses to climate change
by: Zheng Shi, et al.
Published: (2018-06-01) -
The biomass burning contribution to climate–carbon-cycle feedback
by: S. P. Harrison, et al.
Published: (2018-05-01)