New Instruments for Human Rights Protection in Globalization

The Ruggie principles have given new impulse to the process of developing and modernizing International Law through the influence of human rights. However, this process has been developed as “soft law” measures included in the corporate social responsibility activities of multinational...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ana M. Ovejero Puente
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidad de Jaén 2020-06-01
Series:Age of Human Rights Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revistaselectronicas.ujaen.es/index.php/TAHRJ/article/view/5484
id doaj-fde9f5d80b3e48be8e456f31a8d727c9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fde9f5d80b3e48be8e456f31a8d727c92020-11-25T03:42:58ZengUniversidad de JaénAge of Human Rights Journal2340-95922020-06-011421124310.17561/tahrj.v14.5484New Instruments for Human Rights Protection in GlobalizationAna M. Ovejero Puente0Universidad Carlos III de MadridThe Ruggie principles have given new impulse to the process of developing and modernizing International Law through the influence of human rights. However, this process has been developed as “soft law” measures included in the corporate social responsibility activities of multinational companies, which academic opinion deems has lessened the capacity of human rights for transforming international law into more effective and truly binding instruments to avoid abuses against human dignity. This issue has prompted a debate concerning the role of multinationals as subjects of international law, and the advisability of returning to more traditional and conservative approaches to governance of globalization and to effective protection of human rights from risky business activities. However, thanks to Common Law traditions, this model may be transformed into binding rules, using the legal tools of private Law. This reveals the utility of such soft Law regulations in creating cultures of respect useful when rule of law is weak to rule relations between states, companies and people, that arise from the actions of private individuals rather than the activity of public law-making institutions.https://revistaselectronicas.ujaen.es/index.php/TAHRJ/article/view/5484human rights protectionglobalizationmultinational companiesgovernanceinternational bussinessocial responsabilitysoft law regulationhard law regulationcommon law tradition
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ana M. Ovejero Puente
spellingShingle Ana M. Ovejero Puente
New Instruments for Human Rights Protection in Globalization
Age of Human Rights Journal
human rights protection
globalization
multinational companies
governance
international bussines
social responsability
soft law regulation
hard law regulation
common law tradition
author_facet Ana M. Ovejero Puente
author_sort Ana M. Ovejero Puente
title New Instruments for Human Rights Protection in Globalization
title_short New Instruments for Human Rights Protection in Globalization
title_full New Instruments for Human Rights Protection in Globalization
title_fullStr New Instruments for Human Rights Protection in Globalization
title_full_unstemmed New Instruments for Human Rights Protection in Globalization
title_sort new instruments for human rights protection in globalization
publisher Universidad de Jaén
series Age of Human Rights Journal
issn 2340-9592
publishDate 2020-06-01
description The Ruggie principles have given new impulse to the process of developing and modernizing International Law through the influence of human rights. However, this process has been developed as “soft law” measures included in the corporate social responsibility activities of multinational companies, which academic opinion deems has lessened the capacity of human rights for transforming international law into more effective and truly binding instruments to avoid abuses against human dignity. This issue has prompted a debate concerning the role of multinationals as subjects of international law, and the advisability of returning to more traditional and conservative approaches to governance of globalization and to effective protection of human rights from risky business activities. However, thanks to Common Law traditions, this model may be transformed into binding rules, using the legal tools of private Law. This reveals the utility of such soft Law regulations in creating cultures of respect useful when rule of law is weak to rule relations between states, companies and people, that arise from the actions of private individuals rather than the activity of public law-making institutions.
topic human rights protection
globalization
multinational companies
governance
international bussines
social responsability
soft law regulation
hard law regulation
common law tradition
url https://revistaselectronicas.ujaen.es/index.php/TAHRJ/article/view/5484
work_keys_str_mv AT anamovejeropuente newinstrumentsforhumanrightsprotectioninglobalization
_version_ 1724522229309374464