Two h-Index Benchmarks for Evaluating the Publication Performance of Medical Informatics Researchers

BackgroundThe h-index is a commonly used metric for evaluating the publication performance of researchers. However, in a multidisciplinary field such as medical informatics, interpreting the h-index is a challenge because researchers tend to have diverse home disciplines, ran...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: El Emam, Khaled, Arbuckle, Luk, Jonker, Elizabeth, Anderson, Kevin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JMIR Publications 2012-10-01
Series:Journal of Medical Internet Research
Online Access:http://www.jmir.org/2012/5/e144/
id doaj-fdd870ebd9b74908833990a007d44526
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fdd870ebd9b74908833990a007d445262021-04-02T19:20:27ZengJMIR PublicationsJournal of Medical Internet Research1438-88712012-10-01145e14410.2196/jmir.2177Two h-Index Benchmarks for Evaluating the Publication Performance of Medical Informatics ResearchersEl Emam, KhaledArbuckle, LukJonker, ElizabethAnderson, Kevin BackgroundThe h-index is a commonly used metric for evaluating the publication performance of researchers. However, in a multidisciplinary field such as medical informatics, interpreting the h-index is a challenge because researchers tend to have diverse home disciplines, ranging from clinical areas to computer science, basic science, and the social sciences, each with different publication performance profiles. ObjectiveTo construct a reference standard for interpreting the h-index of medical informatics researchers based on the performance of their peers. MethodsUsing a sample of authors with articles published over the 5-year period 2006–2011 in the 2 top journals in medical informatics (as determined by impact factor), we computed their h-index using the Scopus database. Percentiles were computed to create a 6-level benchmark, similar in scheme to one used by the US National Science Foundation, and a 10-level benchmark. ResultsThe 2 benchmarks can be used to place medical informatics researchers in an ordered category based on the performance of their peers. A validation exercise mapped the benchmark levels to the ranks of medical informatics academic faculty in the United States. The 10-level benchmark tracked academic rank better (with no ties) and is therefore more suitable for practical use. ConclusionsOur 10-level benchmark provides an objective basis to evaluate and compare the publication performance of medical informatics researchers with that of their peers using the h-index.http://www.jmir.org/2012/5/e144/
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author El Emam, Khaled
Arbuckle, Luk
Jonker, Elizabeth
Anderson, Kevin
spellingShingle El Emam, Khaled
Arbuckle, Luk
Jonker, Elizabeth
Anderson, Kevin
Two h-Index Benchmarks for Evaluating the Publication Performance of Medical Informatics Researchers
Journal of Medical Internet Research
author_facet El Emam, Khaled
Arbuckle, Luk
Jonker, Elizabeth
Anderson, Kevin
author_sort El Emam, Khaled
title Two h-Index Benchmarks for Evaluating the Publication Performance of Medical Informatics Researchers
title_short Two h-Index Benchmarks for Evaluating the Publication Performance of Medical Informatics Researchers
title_full Two h-Index Benchmarks for Evaluating the Publication Performance of Medical Informatics Researchers
title_fullStr Two h-Index Benchmarks for Evaluating the Publication Performance of Medical Informatics Researchers
title_full_unstemmed Two h-Index Benchmarks for Evaluating the Publication Performance of Medical Informatics Researchers
title_sort two h-index benchmarks for evaluating the publication performance of medical informatics researchers
publisher JMIR Publications
series Journal of Medical Internet Research
issn 1438-8871
publishDate 2012-10-01
description BackgroundThe h-index is a commonly used metric for evaluating the publication performance of researchers. However, in a multidisciplinary field such as medical informatics, interpreting the h-index is a challenge because researchers tend to have diverse home disciplines, ranging from clinical areas to computer science, basic science, and the social sciences, each with different publication performance profiles. ObjectiveTo construct a reference standard for interpreting the h-index of medical informatics researchers based on the performance of their peers. MethodsUsing a sample of authors with articles published over the 5-year period 2006–2011 in the 2 top journals in medical informatics (as determined by impact factor), we computed their h-index using the Scopus database. Percentiles were computed to create a 6-level benchmark, similar in scheme to one used by the US National Science Foundation, and a 10-level benchmark. ResultsThe 2 benchmarks can be used to place medical informatics researchers in an ordered category based on the performance of their peers. A validation exercise mapped the benchmark levels to the ranks of medical informatics academic faculty in the United States. The 10-level benchmark tracked academic rank better (with no ties) and is therefore more suitable for practical use. ConclusionsOur 10-level benchmark provides an objective basis to evaluate and compare the publication performance of medical informatics researchers with that of their peers using the h-index.
url http://www.jmir.org/2012/5/e144/
work_keys_str_mv AT elemamkhaled twohindexbenchmarksforevaluatingthepublicationperformanceofmedicalinformaticsresearchers
AT arbuckleluk twohindexbenchmarksforevaluatingthepublicationperformanceofmedicalinformaticsresearchers
AT jonkerelizabeth twohindexbenchmarksforevaluatingthepublicationperformanceofmedicalinformaticsresearchers
AT andersonkevin twohindexbenchmarksforevaluatingthepublicationperformanceofmedicalinformaticsresearchers
_version_ 1721549226296475648