Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury

<p>Abstract</p> <p>There is increasing interest in using robotic devices to assist in movement training following neurologic injuries such as stroke and spinal cord injury. This paper reviews control strategies for robotic therapy devices. Several categories of strategies have been...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Reinkensmeyer David J, Marchal-Crespo Laura
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2009-06-01
Series:Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Online Access:http://www.jneuroengrehab.com/content/6/1/20
id doaj-fdd1d7feb1824118af94e22f540b52ec
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fdd1d7feb1824118af94e22f540b52ec2020-11-24T21:21:53ZengBMCJournal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation1743-00032009-06-01612010.1186/1743-0003-6-20Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injuryReinkensmeyer David JMarchal-Crespo Laura<p>Abstract</p> <p>There is increasing interest in using robotic devices to assist in movement training following neurologic injuries such as stroke and spinal cord injury. This paper reviews control strategies for robotic therapy devices. Several categories of strategies have been proposed, including, assistive, challenge-based, haptic simulation, and coaching. The greatest amount of work has been done on developing assistive strategies, and thus the majority of this review summarizes techniques for implementing assistive strategies, including impedance-, counterbalance-, and EMG- based controllers, as well as adaptive controllers that modify control parameters based on ongoing participant performance. Clinical evidence regarding the relative effectiveness of different types of robotic therapy controllers is limited, but there is initial evidence that some control strategies are more effective than others. It is also now apparent there may be mechanisms by which some robotic control approaches might actually decrease the recovery possible with comparable, non-robotic forms of training. In future research, there is a need for head-to-head comparison of control algorithms in randomized, controlled clinical trials, and for improved models of human motor recovery to provide a more rational framework for designing robotic therapy control strategies.</p> http://www.jneuroengrehab.com/content/6/1/20
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Reinkensmeyer David J
Marchal-Crespo Laura
spellingShingle Reinkensmeyer David J
Marchal-Crespo Laura
Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
author_facet Reinkensmeyer David J
Marchal-Crespo Laura
author_sort Reinkensmeyer David J
title Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury
title_short Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury
title_full Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury
title_fullStr Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury
title_full_unstemmed Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury
title_sort review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury
publisher BMC
series Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
issn 1743-0003
publishDate 2009-06-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>There is increasing interest in using robotic devices to assist in movement training following neurologic injuries such as stroke and spinal cord injury. This paper reviews control strategies for robotic therapy devices. Several categories of strategies have been proposed, including, assistive, challenge-based, haptic simulation, and coaching. The greatest amount of work has been done on developing assistive strategies, and thus the majority of this review summarizes techniques for implementing assistive strategies, including impedance-, counterbalance-, and EMG- based controllers, as well as adaptive controllers that modify control parameters based on ongoing participant performance. Clinical evidence regarding the relative effectiveness of different types of robotic therapy controllers is limited, but there is initial evidence that some control strategies are more effective than others. It is also now apparent there may be mechanisms by which some robotic control approaches might actually decrease the recovery possible with comparable, non-robotic forms of training. In future research, there is a need for head-to-head comparison of control algorithms in randomized, controlled clinical trials, and for improved models of human motor recovery to provide a more rational framework for designing robotic therapy control strategies.</p>
url http://www.jneuroengrehab.com/content/6/1/20
work_keys_str_mv AT reinkensmeyerdavidj reviewofcontrolstrategiesforroboticmovementtrainingafterneurologicinjury
AT marchalcrespolaura reviewofcontrolstrategiesforroboticmovementtrainingafterneurologicinjury
_version_ 1725997769700671488