The use of a portable three-lead ECG monitor to detect atrial fibrillation in general practice

Objective: To evaluate how well an inexpensive portable three-lead ECG monitor PEM identified patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) compared to a normal 12-lead ECG. Design: Cross-sectional method comparison study. Setting: From April 2014 to February 2015, we included patients coming to the genera...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anne N. Kristensen, Brintha Jeyam, Sam Riahi, Martin B. Jensen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2016-07-01
Series:Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2016.1207151
id doaj-fdceb10399f744989ef807d618a4c0fe
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fdceb10399f744989ef807d618a4c0fe2020-11-25T00:10:48ZengTaylor & Francis GroupScandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care0281-34321502-77242016-07-0134330430810.1080/02813432.2016.12071511207151The use of a portable three-lead ECG monitor to detect atrial fibrillation in general practiceAnne N. Kristensen0Brintha Jeyam1Sam Riahi2Martin B. Jensen3Aalborg UniversityAalborg UniversityAalborg University HospitalAalborg UniversityObjective: To evaluate how well an inexpensive portable three-lead ECG monitor PEM identified patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) compared to a normal 12-lead ECG. Design: Cross-sectional method comparison study. Setting: From April 2014 to February 2015, we included patients coming to the general practice clinic “Lægerne Sløjfen”, Aalborg, Denmark for a routine ECG. Patients with severe dementia, mental illness or poor ECG readings were excluded. After oral and written informed consent an ECG and PEM recordings were obtained simultaneously. The PEM recordings were analyzed by two general practitioners (GPs) in training and ECG recordings were evaluated by a senior GP and a cardiologist. Both the PEM and the ECG recordings were analysed blinded. Subjects: Ninety-three patients were included and four were excluded due to poor ECG readings. Main outcome measures: The sensitivity and specificity of PEM compared to a standard 12-lead ECG. Results: Eighty-nine of the 93 (95.7%) patients had ECGs of a satisfactory technical quality and were included in the study. The sensitivity of diagnosing AF by PEM recordings was 86.7% and the specificity was 98.7% when compared to a 12-lead ECG. According to the cardiologist, the misclassification of three PEM recordings were due to interpretation errors and not related to the PEM recording per se. Conclusions: The inexpensive portable PEM device recording diagnosed AF with a high sensitivity and specificity.KEY POINTS Simple ECG monitors could be useful to identify atrial fibrillation and thereby lead to a better prevention of stroke. The PEM device was easy to use and 95.7% of the recordings were technically acceptable for detecting atrial fibrillation. The PEM device has a high sensitivity and specificity in detecting atrial fibrillation compared to a standard 12-lead ECG. Further studies should evaluate the clinical usefulness of the PEM device, e.g. to detect intermittent atrial fibrillation.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2016.1207151Ambulatoryatrial fibrillationelectrocardiographyfamily practicegeneral practiceDenmark
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anne N. Kristensen
Brintha Jeyam
Sam Riahi
Martin B. Jensen
spellingShingle Anne N. Kristensen
Brintha Jeyam
Sam Riahi
Martin B. Jensen
The use of a portable three-lead ECG monitor to detect atrial fibrillation in general practice
Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care
Ambulatory
atrial fibrillation
electrocardiography
family practice
general practice
Denmark
author_facet Anne N. Kristensen
Brintha Jeyam
Sam Riahi
Martin B. Jensen
author_sort Anne N. Kristensen
title The use of a portable three-lead ECG monitor to detect atrial fibrillation in general practice
title_short The use of a portable three-lead ECG monitor to detect atrial fibrillation in general practice
title_full The use of a portable three-lead ECG monitor to detect atrial fibrillation in general practice
title_fullStr The use of a portable three-lead ECG monitor to detect atrial fibrillation in general practice
title_full_unstemmed The use of a portable three-lead ECG monitor to detect atrial fibrillation in general practice
title_sort use of a portable three-lead ecg monitor to detect atrial fibrillation in general practice
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care
issn 0281-3432
1502-7724
publishDate 2016-07-01
description Objective: To evaluate how well an inexpensive portable three-lead ECG monitor PEM identified patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) compared to a normal 12-lead ECG. Design: Cross-sectional method comparison study. Setting: From April 2014 to February 2015, we included patients coming to the general practice clinic “Lægerne Sløjfen”, Aalborg, Denmark for a routine ECG. Patients with severe dementia, mental illness or poor ECG readings were excluded. After oral and written informed consent an ECG and PEM recordings were obtained simultaneously. The PEM recordings were analyzed by two general practitioners (GPs) in training and ECG recordings were evaluated by a senior GP and a cardiologist. Both the PEM and the ECG recordings were analysed blinded. Subjects: Ninety-three patients were included and four were excluded due to poor ECG readings. Main outcome measures: The sensitivity and specificity of PEM compared to a standard 12-lead ECG. Results: Eighty-nine of the 93 (95.7%) patients had ECGs of a satisfactory technical quality and were included in the study. The sensitivity of diagnosing AF by PEM recordings was 86.7% and the specificity was 98.7% when compared to a 12-lead ECG. According to the cardiologist, the misclassification of three PEM recordings were due to interpretation errors and not related to the PEM recording per se. Conclusions: The inexpensive portable PEM device recording diagnosed AF with a high sensitivity and specificity.KEY POINTS Simple ECG monitors could be useful to identify atrial fibrillation and thereby lead to a better prevention of stroke. The PEM device was easy to use and 95.7% of the recordings were technically acceptable for detecting atrial fibrillation. The PEM device has a high sensitivity and specificity in detecting atrial fibrillation compared to a standard 12-lead ECG. Further studies should evaluate the clinical usefulness of the PEM device, e.g. to detect intermittent atrial fibrillation.
topic Ambulatory
atrial fibrillation
electrocardiography
family practice
general practice
Denmark
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2016.1207151
work_keys_str_mv AT annenkristensen theuseofaportablethreeleadecgmonitortodetectatrialfibrillationingeneralpractice
AT brinthajeyam theuseofaportablethreeleadecgmonitortodetectatrialfibrillationingeneralpractice
AT samriahi theuseofaportablethreeleadecgmonitortodetectatrialfibrillationingeneralpractice
AT martinbjensen theuseofaportablethreeleadecgmonitortodetectatrialfibrillationingeneralpractice
AT annenkristensen useofaportablethreeleadecgmonitortodetectatrialfibrillationingeneralpractice
AT brinthajeyam useofaportablethreeleadecgmonitortodetectatrialfibrillationingeneralpractice
AT samriahi useofaportablethreeleadecgmonitortodetectatrialfibrillationingeneralpractice
AT martinbjensen useofaportablethreeleadecgmonitortodetectatrialfibrillationingeneralpractice
_version_ 1725406955720146944