Changing attitudes towards obesity – results from a survey experiment

Abstract Background This experimental study in a population-based sample aimed to compare attitudes towards obesity following three different causal explanations for obesity (individual behavior, environmental factors, genetic factors). Methods The data were derived from an online representative sam...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: C. Luck-Sikorski, S. G. Riedel-Heller, J. C. Phelan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-05-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-017-4275-y
id doaj-fdcd01781ec940bdb245d43c9b0b434c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fdcd01781ec940bdb245d43c9b0b434c2020-11-25T01:49:35ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582017-05-0117111310.1186/s12889-017-4275-yChanging attitudes towards obesity – results from a survey experimentC. Luck-Sikorski0S. G. Riedel-Heller1J. C. Phelan2Institute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health (ISAP), University of LeipzigLeipzig University Medical Center, IFB AdiposityDiseasesMailman School of Public Health, Columbia UniversityAbstract Background This experimental study in a population-based sample aimed to compare attitudes towards obesity following three different causal explanations for obesity (individual behavior, environmental factors, genetic factors). Methods The data were derived from an online representative sample. A random subsample of n = 407 participants was included. Two independent variables were investigated: cause of obesity as described in the vignette and cause of obesity as perceived by the participant regardless of vignette. Quality features of the vignettes (accuracy and bias of the vignette) were introduced as moderators to regression models. Three stigma-related outcomes (negative attitudes, blame and social distance) served as dependent variables. Results Inaccuracy and bias was ascribed to the social environmental and genetic vignettes more often than to the individual cause vignette. Overall, participants preferred individual causes (72.6%). While personal beliefs did not differ between the genetic and environmental cause conditions (Chi2 = 4.36, p = 0.113), both were different from the distribution seen in the individual cause vignette. Negative attitudes as well as blame were associated with the belief that individuals are responsible for obesity (b = 0.374, p = 0.003; 0.597, p < 0.001), but were not associated with vignette-manipulated causal explanation. The vignette presenting individual responsibility was associated with lower levels of social distance (b = −0.183, p = 0.043). After including perceived inaccuracy and bias as moderators, the individual responsibility vignette was associated with higher levels of blame (emphasis: b = 0.980, p = 0.010; bias: b = 0.778, p = 0.001) and the effect on social distance vanished. Conclusions This study shows that media and public health campaigns may solidify beliefs that obesity is due to individual causes and consequently increase stigma when presenting individual behavior as a cause of obesity. Public health messages that emphasize the role of social environmental or genetic causes may be ineffective because of entrenched beliefs.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-017-4275-yObesityPublic healthStigmatizationAttitudesVignette studyPopulation-based study
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author C. Luck-Sikorski
S. G. Riedel-Heller
J. C. Phelan
spellingShingle C. Luck-Sikorski
S. G. Riedel-Heller
J. C. Phelan
Changing attitudes towards obesity – results from a survey experiment
BMC Public Health
Obesity
Public health
Stigmatization
Attitudes
Vignette study
Population-based study
author_facet C. Luck-Sikorski
S. G. Riedel-Heller
J. C. Phelan
author_sort C. Luck-Sikorski
title Changing attitudes towards obesity – results from a survey experiment
title_short Changing attitudes towards obesity – results from a survey experiment
title_full Changing attitudes towards obesity – results from a survey experiment
title_fullStr Changing attitudes towards obesity – results from a survey experiment
title_full_unstemmed Changing attitudes towards obesity – results from a survey experiment
title_sort changing attitudes towards obesity – results from a survey experiment
publisher BMC
series BMC Public Health
issn 1471-2458
publishDate 2017-05-01
description Abstract Background This experimental study in a population-based sample aimed to compare attitudes towards obesity following three different causal explanations for obesity (individual behavior, environmental factors, genetic factors). Methods The data were derived from an online representative sample. A random subsample of n = 407 participants was included. Two independent variables were investigated: cause of obesity as described in the vignette and cause of obesity as perceived by the participant regardless of vignette. Quality features of the vignettes (accuracy and bias of the vignette) were introduced as moderators to regression models. Three stigma-related outcomes (negative attitudes, blame and social distance) served as dependent variables. Results Inaccuracy and bias was ascribed to the social environmental and genetic vignettes more often than to the individual cause vignette. Overall, participants preferred individual causes (72.6%). While personal beliefs did not differ between the genetic and environmental cause conditions (Chi2 = 4.36, p = 0.113), both were different from the distribution seen in the individual cause vignette. Negative attitudes as well as blame were associated with the belief that individuals are responsible for obesity (b = 0.374, p = 0.003; 0.597, p < 0.001), but were not associated with vignette-manipulated causal explanation. The vignette presenting individual responsibility was associated with lower levels of social distance (b = −0.183, p = 0.043). After including perceived inaccuracy and bias as moderators, the individual responsibility vignette was associated with higher levels of blame (emphasis: b = 0.980, p = 0.010; bias: b = 0.778, p = 0.001) and the effect on social distance vanished. Conclusions This study shows that media and public health campaigns may solidify beliefs that obesity is due to individual causes and consequently increase stigma when presenting individual behavior as a cause of obesity. Public health messages that emphasize the role of social environmental or genetic causes may be ineffective because of entrenched beliefs.
topic Obesity
Public health
Stigmatization
Attitudes
Vignette study
Population-based study
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-017-4275-y
work_keys_str_mv AT clucksikorski changingattitudestowardsobesityresultsfromasurveyexperiment
AT sgriedelheller changingattitudestowardsobesityresultsfromasurveyexperiment
AT jcphelan changingattitudestowardsobesityresultsfromasurveyexperiment
_version_ 1725006344902148096