Priming food intake with weight control cues: systematic review with a meta-analysis

Abstract Background A growing number of studies suggest that exposure to cues which are associated with weight control can prime or prompt controlled food intake in tempting food environments. However, findings are mixed and understanding which types of cues and for whom such cues may be most effect...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nicola J. Buckland, Vanessa Er, Ian Redpath, Kristine Beaulieu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-07-01
Series:International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12966-018-0698-9
id doaj-fdcb1b10e5c1488f839c10108469e49e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fdcb1b10e5c1488f839c10108469e49e2020-11-25T02:09:26ZengBMCInternational Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity1479-58682018-07-0115112510.1186/s12966-018-0698-9Priming food intake with weight control cues: systematic review with a meta-analysisNicola J. Buckland0Vanessa Er1Ian Redpath2Kristine Beaulieu3Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Cathedral CourtPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of BristolThe Behaviouralist LtdAppetite Control and Energy Balance Group, School of Psychology, University of LeedsAbstract Background A growing number of studies suggest that exposure to cues which are associated with weight control can prime or prompt controlled food intake in tempting food environments. However, findings are mixed and understanding which types of cues and for whom such cues may be most effective is needed to inform subsequent research and societal applications. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate the effects of exposure to weight control cues compared with control cues on food intake. Methods PsycINFO, Medline, Embase and Web of Science were searched using key terms. Hedge’s g was used to calculate effect sizes based on mean food intake, standard deviations and sample sizes extracted from relevant publications and, a random effects model was used for the meta-analysis. Results Twenty-five articles consisting of 26 studies were eligible. Data from 25 studies (31 effect sizes) were available for the meta-analysis. Overall, weight control cues reduced food intake, albeit to a trivial effect (ES: -0.149, 95% CI: -0.271 to − 0.027). Subgroup analyses when studies which induced negative affect were removed showed that for individuals with strong weight control goals the effect was small-to-moderate (ES: -0.440, 95% CI: -0.718 to − 0.163), whereas for individuals with weak weight control goals this effect was trivial and non-significant (ES: 0.014, 95% CI: -0.249 to 0.278). Cue type and level of engagement did not significantly moderate the effect; however, specific cues (low-calorie foods and thin models) and attended engagement yielded significant effects. Caution is needed interpreting these findings as most studies were rated with high risk of bias and a number of studies could not be included in the subgroup analyses. Conclusions Based on the data available, weight control cues reduce food intake in individuals with strong weight control goals. Further research is needed to explore longer term effects of cue exposure and confirm underlying mechanisms. PROSPERO registry#CRD42016052396.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12966-018-0698-9Food intakeGoal primingWeight control goalsSystematic reviewMeta-analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nicola J. Buckland
Vanessa Er
Ian Redpath
Kristine Beaulieu
spellingShingle Nicola J. Buckland
Vanessa Er
Ian Redpath
Kristine Beaulieu
Priming food intake with weight control cues: systematic review with a meta-analysis
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
Food intake
Goal priming
Weight control goals
Systematic review
Meta-analysis
author_facet Nicola J. Buckland
Vanessa Er
Ian Redpath
Kristine Beaulieu
author_sort Nicola J. Buckland
title Priming food intake with weight control cues: systematic review with a meta-analysis
title_short Priming food intake with weight control cues: systematic review with a meta-analysis
title_full Priming food intake with weight control cues: systematic review with a meta-analysis
title_fullStr Priming food intake with weight control cues: systematic review with a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Priming food intake with weight control cues: systematic review with a meta-analysis
title_sort priming food intake with weight control cues: systematic review with a meta-analysis
publisher BMC
series International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
issn 1479-5868
publishDate 2018-07-01
description Abstract Background A growing number of studies suggest that exposure to cues which are associated with weight control can prime or prompt controlled food intake in tempting food environments. However, findings are mixed and understanding which types of cues and for whom such cues may be most effective is needed to inform subsequent research and societal applications. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate the effects of exposure to weight control cues compared with control cues on food intake. Methods PsycINFO, Medline, Embase and Web of Science were searched using key terms. Hedge’s g was used to calculate effect sizes based on mean food intake, standard deviations and sample sizes extracted from relevant publications and, a random effects model was used for the meta-analysis. Results Twenty-five articles consisting of 26 studies were eligible. Data from 25 studies (31 effect sizes) were available for the meta-analysis. Overall, weight control cues reduced food intake, albeit to a trivial effect (ES: -0.149, 95% CI: -0.271 to − 0.027). Subgroup analyses when studies which induced negative affect were removed showed that for individuals with strong weight control goals the effect was small-to-moderate (ES: -0.440, 95% CI: -0.718 to − 0.163), whereas for individuals with weak weight control goals this effect was trivial and non-significant (ES: 0.014, 95% CI: -0.249 to 0.278). Cue type and level of engagement did not significantly moderate the effect; however, specific cues (low-calorie foods and thin models) and attended engagement yielded significant effects. Caution is needed interpreting these findings as most studies were rated with high risk of bias and a number of studies could not be included in the subgroup analyses. Conclusions Based on the data available, weight control cues reduce food intake in individuals with strong weight control goals. Further research is needed to explore longer term effects of cue exposure and confirm underlying mechanisms. PROSPERO registry#CRD42016052396.
topic Food intake
Goal priming
Weight control goals
Systematic review
Meta-analysis
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12966-018-0698-9
work_keys_str_mv AT nicolajbuckland primingfoodintakewithweightcontrolcuessystematicreviewwithametaanalysis
AT vanessaer primingfoodintakewithweightcontrolcuessystematicreviewwithametaanalysis
AT ianredpath primingfoodintakewithweightcontrolcuessystematicreviewwithametaanalysis
AT kristinebeaulieu primingfoodintakewithweightcontrolcuessystematicreviewwithametaanalysis
_version_ 1724923801807880192