Decompressive craniectomy or not: intraoperative expe-rience in 41 patients with severe traumatic brain injury

【Abstract】Objective: To present our experience in using decompressive craniectomy (DC) among severe trau-matic brain injury (TBI) patients during operation and to discuss its indication. Methods: From October 2008 to May 2009, 41 patients aged between 18 and 75 years with severe TBI were i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: YANG Chao-hua, LI Qiang, WU Cong, MA Jun-peng, YOU Chao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2012-06-01
Series:Chinese Journal of Traumatology
Online Access:http://www.cjtrauma.com/apps/ojs/index.php/cjt/article/view/243
id doaj-fdb038f5457c4a439edeb9c9d19ff099
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fdb038f5457c4a439edeb9c9d19ff0992020-11-24T21:36:14ZengElsevierChinese Journal of Traumatology1008-12752012-06-01153158161141Decompressive craniectomy or not: intraoperative expe-rience in 41 patients with severe traumatic brain injuryYANG Chao-huaLI QiangWU CongMA Jun-pengYOU Chao【Abstract】Objective: To present our experience in using decompressive craniectomy (DC) among severe trau-matic brain injury (TBI) patients during operation and to discuss its indication. Methods: From October 2008 to May 2009, 41 patients aged between 18 and 75 years with severe TBI were in-cluded in this study. They underwent DC or non-DC (NDC) according to their intraoperative findings. Postoperative intracranial pressure (ICP), complications, requiring second operation or not and outcomes were observed. Results: Fifteen patients underwent DC and 26 pa-tients did not. The average postoperative ICP of each pa-tient was lower than 20 mm Hg. For patients received DC, 2 had seizures after operation and 1 developed cerebrocele in the follow-up period; only 1 NDC patient had post-trau-matic seizures, but none of them had delayed haematoma, cerebrospinal fluid fistula, cerebrocele or infections. At the end of follow-up, 10 patients died, 6 had the GOS of 2, 2 of 3, 9 of 4 and 14 of 5. Conclusions: DC is necessary to manage fulminant intracranial hypertension or intraoperative brain swelling. If there was not brain swelling after removal of the haematoma and necrotized neural tissues, it is safe to replace skull flap. The intraoperative finding is an important factor to decide whether to perform DC or not. Key words: Decompressive craniectomy; Brain injury; Intracranial pressurehttp://www.cjtrauma.com/apps/ojs/index.php/cjt/article/view/243
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author YANG Chao-hua
LI Qiang
WU Cong
MA Jun-peng
YOU Chao
spellingShingle YANG Chao-hua
LI Qiang
WU Cong
MA Jun-peng
YOU Chao
Decompressive craniectomy or not: intraoperative expe-rience in 41 patients with severe traumatic brain injury
Chinese Journal of Traumatology
author_facet YANG Chao-hua
LI Qiang
WU Cong
MA Jun-peng
YOU Chao
author_sort YANG Chao-hua
title Decompressive craniectomy or not: intraoperative expe-rience in 41 patients with severe traumatic brain injury
title_short Decompressive craniectomy or not: intraoperative expe-rience in 41 patients with severe traumatic brain injury
title_full Decompressive craniectomy or not: intraoperative expe-rience in 41 patients with severe traumatic brain injury
title_fullStr Decompressive craniectomy or not: intraoperative expe-rience in 41 patients with severe traumatic brain injury
title_full_unstemmed Decompressive craniectomy or not: intraoperative expe-rience in 41 patients with severe traumatic brain injury
title_sort decompressive craniectomy or not: intraoperative expe-rience in 41 patients with severe traumatic brain injury
publisher Elsevier
series Chinese Journal of Traumatology
issn 1008-1275
publishDate 2012-06-01
description 【Abstract】Objective: To present our experience in using decompressive craniectomy (DC) among severe trau-matic brain injury (TBI) patients during operation and to discuss its indication. Methods: From October 2008 to May 2009, 41 patients aged between 18 and 75 years with severe TBI were in-cluded in this study. They underwent DC or non-DC (NDC) according to their intraoperative findings. Postoperative intracranial pressure (ICP), complications, requiring second operation or not and outcomes were observed. Results: Fifteen patients underwent DC and 26 pa-tients did not. The average postoperative ICP of each pa-tient was lower than 20 mm Hg. For patients received DC, 2 had seizures after operation and 1 developed cerebrocele in the follow-up period; only 1 NDC patient had post-trau-matic seizures, but none of them had delayed haematoma, cerebrospinal fluid fistula, cerebrocele or infections. At the end of follow-up, 10 patients died, 6 had the GOS of 2, 2 of 3, 9 of 4 and 14 of 5. Conclusions: DC is necessary to manage fulminant intracranial hypertension or intraoperative brain swelling. If there was not brain swelling after removal of the haematoma and necrotized neural tissues, it is safe to replace skull flap. The intraoperative finding is an important factor to decide whether to perform DC or not. Key words: Decompressive craniectomy; Brain injury; Intracranial pressure
url http://www.cjtrauma.com/apps/ojs/index.php/cjt/article/view/243
work_keys_str_mv AT yangchaohua decompressivecraniectomyornotintraoperativeexperiencein41patientswithseveretraumaticbraininjury
AT liqiang decompressivecraniectomyornotintraoperativeexperiencein41patientswithseveretraumaticbraininjury
AT wucong decompressivecraniectomyornotintraoperativeexperiencein41patientswithseveretraumaticbraininjury
AT majunpeng decompressivecraniectomyornotintraoperativeexperiencein41patientswithseveretraumaticbraininjury
AT youchao decompressivecraniectomyornotintraoperativeexperiencein41patientswithseveretraumaticbraininjury
_version_ 1725942357969338368