Geometric and dimensional characteristics of simulated curved canals prepared with proTaper instruments

OBJECTIVE: This study identified which regions of ProTaper instruments work during curved root canal instrumentation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twelve ProTaper instruments of each type, S1, S2, F1, and F2, were assessed morphometrically by measuring tip angle, tip length, tip diameter, length of each pi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Renata de Castro Martins, Maria Guiomar de Azevedo Bahia, Vicente Tadeu Lopes Buono
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of São Paulo 2010-02-01
Series:Journal of Applied Oral Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572010000100009
id doaj-fda976ce58fd4dea8471542b51a1fcd0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fda976ce58fd4dea8471542b51a1fcd02020-11-24T21:49:20ZengUniversity of São PauloJournal of Applied Oral Science1678-77571678-77652010-02-01181444910.1590/S1678-77572010000100009Geometric and dimensional characteristics of simulated curved canals prepared with proTaper instrumentsRenata de Castro MartinsMaria Guiomar de Azevedo BahiaVicente Tadeu Lopes BuonoOBJECTIVE: This study identified which regions of ProTaper instruments work during curved root canal instrumentation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twelve ProTaper instruments of each type, S1, S2, F1, and F2, were assessed morphometrically by measuring tip angle, tip length, tip diameter, length of each pitch along the cutting blades, and instrument diameter at each millimeter from the tip. Curved canals in resin blocks were explored with manual stainless steel files and prepared with ProTaper instruments until the apical end following four distinct sequences of instrumentation: S1; S1 and S2; S1, S2, and F1; S1, S2, F1, and F2. Image analysis was employed for measuring canal diameters. The diameters of the canals and diameters of the instruments were compared. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was found between the canals and instrument diameters (p>0.05). The largest diameters in the end-point of the instrumented canals were obtained with F1 and F2 instruments and in the initial and middle thirds with S1 and S2 instruments. CONCLUSIONS: All instruments worked at the tip and along their cutting blades, being susceptible to fail by torsion, fatigue, or the combination of these two mechanisms.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572010000100009Nickel-titaniumEndodontic instrumentsCurved canals
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Renata de Castro Martins
Maria Guiomar de Azevedo Bahia
Vicente Tadeu Lopes Buono
spellingShingle Renata de Castro Martins
Maria Guiomar de Azevedo Bahia
Vicente Tadeu Lopes Buono
Geometric and dimensional characteristics of simulated curved canals prepared with proTaper instruments
Journal of Applied Oral Science
Nickel-titanium
Endodontic instruments
Curved canals
author_facet Renata de Castro Martins
Maria Guiomar de Azevedo Bahia
Vicente Tadeu Lopes Buono
author_sort Renata de Castro Martins
title Geometric and dimensional characteristics of simulated curved canals prepared with proTaper instruments
title_short Geometric and dimensional characteristics of simulated curved canals prepared with proTaper instruments
title_full Geometric and dimensional characteristics of simulated curved canals prepared with proTaper instruments
title_fullStr Geometric and dimensional characteristics of simulated curved canals prepared with proTaper instruments
title_full_unstemmed Geometric and dimensional characteristics of simulated curved canals prepared with proTaper instruments
title_sort geometric and dimensional characteristics of simulated curved canals prepared with protaper instruments
publisher University of São Paulo
series Journal of Applied Oral Science
issn 1678-7757
1678-7765
publishDate 2010-02-01
description OBJECTIVE: This study identified which regions of ProTaper instruments work during curved root canal instrumentation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twelve ProTaper instruments of each type, S1, S2, F1, and F2, were assessed morphometrically by measuring tip angle, tip length, tip diameter, length of each pitch along the cutting blades, and instrument diameter at each millimeter from the tip. Curved canals in resin blocks were explored with manual stainless steel files and prepared with ProTaper instruments until the apical end following four distinct sequences of instrumentation: S1; S1 and S2; S1, S2, and F1; S1, S2, F1, and F2. Image analysis was employed for measuring canal diameters. The diameters of the canals and diameters of the instruments were compared. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was found between the canals and instrument diameters (p>0.05). The largest diameters in the end-point of the instrumented canals were obtained with F1 and F2 instruments and in the initial and middle thirds with S1 and S2 instruments. CONCLUSIONS: All instruments worked at the tip and along their cutting blades, being susceptible to fail by torsion, fatigue, or the combination of these two mechanisms.
topic Nickel-titanium
Endodontic instruments
Curved canals
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572010000100009
work_keys_str_mv AT renatadecastromartins geometricanddimensionalcharacteristicsofsimulatedcurvedcanalspreparedwithprotaperinstruments
AT mariaguiomardeazevedobahia geometricanddimensionalcharacteristicsofsimulatedcurvedcanalspreparedwithprotaperinstruments
AT vicentetadeulopesbuono geometricanddimensionalcharacteristicsofsimulatedcurvedcanalspreparedwithprotaperinstruments
_version_ 1725888005908987904