The Politics behind the Consultation of Expert Groups: An Instrument to Reduce Uncertainty or to Offset Salience?

This paper answers the following question: Do the uncertainty and salience of issues determine whether the European Commission will use an expert group to assist with policy formulation? Using rationalist theory, three hypotheses test whether transversality, the importance of standard-setting and th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bart Van Ballaert
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cogitatio 2015-03-01
Series:Politics and Governance
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/84
id doaj-fd9aac3a156c40c9945fd2221e581cbb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fd9aac3a156c40c9945fd2221e581cbb2020-11-25T00:56:44ZengCogitatioPolitics and Governance2183-24632015-03-013113915010.17645/pag.v3i1.84117The Politics behind the Consultation of Expert Groups: An Instrument to Reduce Uncertainty or to Offset Salience?Bart Van Ballaert0Institut de Sciences Politiques Louvain-Europe (ISPOLE), University of Louvain, BelgiumThis paper answers the following question: Do the uncertainty and salience of issues determine whether the European Commission will use an expert group to assist with policy formulation? Using rationalist theory, three hypotheses test whether transversality, the importance of standard-setting and the salience of a policy proposal determine whether a Commission DG will ask an expert group to assist in preparing that same proposal. Data was retrieved from official docu-ments via EUR-Lex. A binary logistic regression analysis has been conducted on a sample of 260 proposals that were drafted by DG Climate Action, DG Communications Networks, Content & Technology, DG Environment and DG Internal Market and Services. All proposals were adopted between 2010 and 2013. The empirical analysis shows that expert group involvement in policy formulation is neither negligible nor ubiquitous in terms of frequency as expert groups as-sisted in preparing 33.5% of the proposals. DGs were significantly more likely to consult an expert group when the pro-posal under preparation was more transversal in nature and/or when that proposal treated standard-setting more pro-nouncedly. In contrast, the salience of a proposal was shown to be insignificantly related to the presence of an expert group during policy formulation.https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/84bureaucratic politicsexpert groupsEuropean Commissionpolicy formulationsalienceuncertainty
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bart Van Ballaert
spellingShingle Bart Van Ballaert
The Politics behind the Consultation of Expert Groups: An Instrument to Reduce Uncertainty or to Offset Salience?
Politics and Governance
bureaucratic politics
expert groups
European Commission
policy formulation
salience
uncertainty
author_facet Bart Van Ballaert
author_sort Bart Van Ballaert
title The Politics behind the Consultation of Expert Groups: An Instrument to Reduce Uncertainty or to Offset Salience?
title_short The Politics behind the Consultation of Expert Groups: An Instrument to Reduce Uncertainty or to Offset Salience?
title_full The Politics behind the Consultation of Expert Groups: An Instrument to Reduce Uncertainty or to Offset Salience?
title_fullStr The Politics behind the Consultation of Expert Groups: An Instrument to Reduce Uncertainty or to Offset Salience?
title_full_unstemmed The Politics behind the Consultation of Expert Groups: An Instrument to Reduce Uncertainty or to Offset Salience?
title_sort politics behind the consultation of expert groups: an instrument to reduce uncertainty or to offset salience?
publisher Cogitatio
series Politics and Governance
issn 2183-2463
publishDate 2015-03-01
description This paper answers the following question: Do the uncertainty and salience of issues determine whether the European Commission will use an expert group to assist with policy formulation? Using rationalist theory, three hypotheses test whether transversality, the importance of standard-setting and the salience of a policy proposal determine whether a Commission DG will ask an expert group to assist in preparing that same proposal. Data was retrieved from official docu-ments via EUR-Lex. A binary logistic regression analysis has been conducted on a sample of 260 proposals that were drafted by DG Climate Action, DG Communications Networks, Content & Technology, DG Environment and DG Internal Market and Services. All proposals were adopted between 2010 and 2013. The empirical analysis shows that expert group involvement in policy formulation is neither negligible nor ubiquitous in terms of frequency as expert groups as-sisted in preparing 33.5% of the proposals. DGs were significantly more likely to consult an expert group when the pro-posal under preparation was more transversal in nature and/or when that proposal treated standard-setting more pro-nouncedly. In contrast, the salience of a proposal was shown to be insignificantly related to the presence of an expert group during policy formulation.
topic bureaucratic politics
expert groups
European Commission
policy formulation
salience
uncertainty
url https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/84
work_keys_str_mv AT bartvanballaert thepoliticsbehindtheconsultationofexpertgroupsaninstrumenttoreduceuncertaintyortooffsetsalience
AT bartvanballaert politicsbehindtheconsultationofexpertgroupsaninstrumenttoreduceuncertaintyortooffsetsalience
_version_ 1725225753696534528