Audit of Gastric Cancer Pathology Reports in Yazd

Background: The intent of this study was to audit and evaluate the information content of pathology reports of resected gastric cancer specimens in Yazd, Iran. Methods: All gastric cancer reports of patients from the histopathology laboratories in Yazd over a six-year period who referred for adjuvan...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ali Akhavan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2011-10-01
Series:Middle East Journal of Cancer
Subjects:
Online Access:http://mejc.sums.ac.ir/index.php/mejc/article/view/59/162
id doaj-fd6d7177d0cf474c97c6a0b5ba40d2a0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fd6d7177d0cf474c97c6a0b5ba40d2a02020-11-25T01:40:43ZengShiraz University of Medical SciencesMiddle East Journal of Cancer 2008-67092008-66872011-10-0123 & 4113116Audit of Gastric Cancer Pathology Reports in YazdAli AkhavanBackground: The intent of this study was to audit and evaluate the information content of pathology reports of resected gastric cancer specimens in Yazd, Iran. Methods: All gastric cancer reports of patients from the histopathology laboratories in Yazd over a six-year period who referred for adjuvant radiation therapy to Shahid Ramazanzadeh Radiation Oncology Center were evaluated for their informationcontent. A standard was adapted from the Nationwide guideline, version 1.0 of Netherland that explained the minimum data set for gastric cancer pathology reports that included: histologic type, grade, T stage, N stage, distance between the tumor and nearest resection margin, tumor size and, location, as well as perineural, lymphatic and vascular invasion. Results:We audited 56 reports. Unfortunately, none of the reports were adequate. Tumor subtype was not reported in 80.4% of patients, grade in 16.1%, T stage in 8.9%, N stage in 26.8%, margin in 57.1%, tumor size in 10.7%, and location in 41.1%. Conclusion: This audit showed a need to improve the information content of gastric cancer pathology reports. The widespread implementation of template proforma reporting is proposed as the most effective way of achieving this goal. On the other hand, improving surgical techniques, adequate lymph node resection and tumor resection with adequate margins is necessary.http://mejc.sums.ac.ir/index.php/mejc/article/view/59/162Gastric cancerAuditPathology reportYazd
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ali Akhavan
spellingShingle Ali Akhavan
Audit of Gastric Cancer Pathology Reports in Yazd
Middle East Journal of Cancer
Gastric cancer
Audit
Pathology report
Yazd
author_facet Ali Akhavan
author_sort Ali Akhavan
title Audit of Gastric Cancer Pathology Reports in Yazd
title_short Audit of Gastric Cancer Pathology Reports in Yazd
title_full Audit of Gastric Cancer Pathology Reports in Yazd
title_fullStr Audit of Gastric Cancer Pathology Reports in Yazd
title_full_unstemmed Audit of Gastric Cancer Pathology Reports in Yazd
title_sort audit of gastric cancer pathology reports in yazd
publisher Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
series Middle East Journal of Cancer
issn 2008-6709
2008-6687
publishDate 2011-10-01
description Background: The intent of this study was to audit and evaluate the information content of pathology reports of resected gastric cancer specimens in Yazd, Iran. Methods: All gastric cancer reports of patients from the histopathology laboratories in Yazd over a six-year period who referred for adjuvant radiation therapy to Shahid Ramazanzadeh Radiation Oncology Center were evaluated for their informationcontent. A standard was adapted from the Nationwide guideline, version 1.0 of Netherland that explained the minimum data set for gastric cancer pathology reports that included: histologic type, grade, T stage, N stage, distance between the tumor and nearest resection margin, tumor size and, location, as well as perineural, lymphatic and vascular invasion. Results:We audited 56 reports. Unfortunately, none of the reports were adequate. Tumor subtype was not reported in 80.4% of patients, grade in 16.1%, T stage in 8.9%, N stage in 26.8%, margin in 57.1%, tumor size in 10.7%, and location in 41.1%. Conclusion: This audit showed a need to improve the information content of gastric cancer pathology reports. The widespread implementation of template proforma reporting is proposed as the most effective way of achieving this goal. On the other hand, improving surgical techniques, adequate lymph node resection and tumor resection with adequate margins is necessary.
topic Gastric cancer
Audit
Pathology report
Yazd
url http://mejc.sums.ac.ir/index.php/mejc/article/view/59/162
work_keys_str_mv AT aliakhavan auditofgastriccancerpathologyreportsinyazd
_version_ 1725043842412969984