THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CARDIOPULMONARY PHYSIOTHERAPY VERSUS PRONE POSITIONING ON RESPIRATORY FUNCTIONS IN VENTILATED NEONATES: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED PILOT STUDY

Background: Chest physiotherapy (CPT) and positioning of neonates has been used in many developed countries around the world to improve airway clearance and avoid lung complications, but the combined effect of both techniques is less documented. The objective of the study was to compare the effecti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abhijit Diwate, Subhash Khatri, Sunil Mhaske
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IJPHY 2018-02-01
Series:International Journal of Physiotherapy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ijphy.org/index.php/journal/article/view/343
id doaj-fd6ab6660b384386b575a8061a28f00a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fd6ab6660b384386b575a8061a28f00a2020-11-24T22:06:51ZengIJPHYInternational Journal of Physiotherapy2349-59872348-83362018-02-015110.15621/ijphy/2018/v5i1/167195THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CARDIOPULMONARY PHYSIOTHERAPY VERSUS PRONE POSITIONING ON RESPIRATORY FUNCTIONS IN VENTILATED NEONATES: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED PILOT STUDYAbhijit Diwate0Subhash Khatri 1Sunil Mhaske2Ph.D. Scholar, Dr. Vitthalrao Vikhe Patil Foundation’s College of Physiotherapy, Vadgaon Gupta, MIDC, Ahmednagar–414111, Maharashtra. Principal and Ph.D. Supervisor, APJAK College of Physiotherapy, PIMS, Loni. Professor and Head, Department of Paediatrics, DVVPF’s Medical College, Ahmednagar Background: Chest physiotherapy (CPT) and positioning of neonates has been used in many developed countries around the world to improve airway clearance and avoid lung complications, but the combined effect of both techniques is less documented. The objective of the study was to compare the effectiveness of chest physiotherapy in prone position versus conventional chest physiotherapy in ventilated neonates on respiratory outcomes. Methods: The study design was randomized controlled pilot study. Participants: 12 ventilated neonates fitting in Inclusion Criteria. They were randomly divided into two groups (n=6 in each group) using simple random sampling i.e. Experimental group (4female and 2male) (Chest Physiotherapy and Prone Positioning) and the Control group (3 females and 3males) (Conventional Chest Physiotherapy). Primary outcome measures were SpO2 saturation, Partial Pressure of Arterial Oxygen (PaO2) & Peak Inspiratory Pressure (P.I.P.). Outcomes were recorded Pre & Post of every 120 minutes session of Intervention twice daily with a gap of 6 hours for consecutive three days for the experimental group while for the control group, parameters were measured at the same time of the day. Result: Total 10 participants completed the study protocol. On comparison of three parameters in two groups using the unpaired t-test, we found that there was a significant difference (p< 0.05) in SpO2 and PaO2 in both groups but no difference ( p >0.05) in P.I.P. levels. Conclusion: Chest physiotherapy in the prone position for ventilated neonate concluded with a higher oxygen saturation (SpO2) and partial pressure of oxygen in the arterial blood (PaO2) when compared to conventional chest physiotherapy. https://www.ijphy.org/index.php/journal/article/view/343Chest PhysiotherapyVentilated neonatesProne positioningArterial OxygenPeak Inspiratory Pressurepartial pressure of oxygen
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Abhijit Diwate
Subhash Khatri
Sunil Mhaske
spellingShingle Abhijit Diwate
Subhash Khatri
Sunil Mhaske
THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CARDIOPULMONARY PHYSIOTHERAPY VERSUS PRONE POSITIONING ON RESPIRATORY FUNCTIONS IN VENTILATED NEONATES: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED PILOT STUDY
International Journal of Physiotherapy
Chest Physiotherapy
Ventilated neonates
Prone positioning
Arterial Oxygen
Peak Inspiratory Pressure
partial pressure of oxygen
author_facet Abhijit Diwate
Subhash Khatri
Sunil Mhaske
author_sort Abhijit Diwate
title THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CARDIOPULMONARY PHYSIOTHERAPY VERSUS PRONE POSITIONING ON RESPIRATORY FUNCTIONS IN VENTILATED NEONATES: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED PILOT STUDY
title_short THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CARDIOPULMONARY PHYSIOTHERAPY VERSUS PRONE POSITIONING ON RESPIRATORY FUNCTIONS IN VENTILATED NEONATES: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED PILOT STUDY
title_full THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CARDIOPULMONARY PHYSIOTHERAPY VERSUS PRONE POSITIONING ON RESPIRATORY FUNCTIONS IN VENTILATED NEONATES: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED PILOT STUDY
title_fullStr THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CARDIOPULMONARY PHYSIOTHERAPY VERSUS PRONE POSITIONING ON RESPIRATORY FUNCTIONS IN VENTILATED NEONATES: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED PILOT STUDY
title_full_unstemmed THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CARDIOPULMONARY PHYSIOTHERAPY VERSUS PRONE POSITIONING ON RESPIRATORY FUNCTIONS IN VENTILATED NEONATES: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED PILOT STUDY
title_sort effectiveness of cardiopulmonary physiotherapy versus prone positioning on respiratory functions in ventilated neonates: a randomized controlled pilot study
publisher IJPHY
series International Journal of Physiotherapy
issn 2349-5987
2348-8336
publishDate 2018-02-01
description Background: Chest physiotherapy (CPT) and positioning of neonates has been used in many developed countries around the world to improve airway clearance and avoid lung complications, but the combined effect of both techniques is less documented. The objective of the study was to compare the effectiveness of chest physiotherapy in prone position versus conventional chest physiotherapy in ventilated neonates on respiratory outcomes. Methods: The study design was randomized controlled pilot study. Participants: 12 ventilated neonates fitting in Inclusion Criteria. They were randomly divided into two groups (n=6 in each group) using simple random sampling i.e. Experimental group (4female and 2male) (Chest Physiotherapy and Prone Positioning) and the Control group (3 females and 3males) (Conventional Chest Physiotherapy). Primary outcome measures were SpO2 saturation, Partial Pressure of Arterial Oxygen (PaO2) & Peak Inspiratory Pressure (P.I.P.). Outcomes were recorded Pre & Post of every 120 minutes session of Intervention twice daily with a gap of 6 hours for consecutive three days for the experimental group while for the control group, parameters were measured at the same time of the day. Result: Total 10 participants completed the study protocol. On comparison of three parameters in two groups using the unpaired t-test, we found that there was a significant difference (p< 0.05) in SpO2 and PaO2 in both groups but no difference ( p >0.05) in P.I.P. levels. Conclusion: Chest physiotherapy in the prone position for ventilated neonate concluded with a higher oxygen saturation (SpO2) and partial pressure of oxygen in the arterial blood (PaO2) when compared to conventional chest physiotherapy.
topic Chest Physiotherapy
Ventilated neonates
Prone positioning
Arterial Oxygen
Peak Inspiratory Pressure
partial pressure of oxygen
url https://www.ijphy.org/index.php/journal/article/view/343
work_keys_str_mv AT abhijitdiwate theeffectivenessofcardiopulmonaryphysiotherapyversuspronepositioningonrespiratoryfunctionsinventilatedneonatesarandomizedcontrolledpilotstudy
AT subhashkhatri theeffectivenessofcardiopulmonaryphysiotherapyversuspronepositioningonrespiratoryfunctionsinventilatedneonatesarandomizedcontrolledpilotstudy
AT sunilmhaske theeffectivenessofcardiopulmonaryphysiotherapyversuspronepositioningonrespiratoryfunctionsinventilatedneonatesarandomizedcontrolledpilotstudy
AT abhijitdiwate effectivenessofcardiopulmonaryphysiotherapyversuspronepositioningonrespiratoryfunctionsinventilatedneonatesarandomizedcontrolledpilotstudy
AT subhashkhatri effectivenessofcardiopulmonaryphysiotherapyversuspronepositioningonrespiratoryfunctionsinventilatedneonatesarandomizedcontrolledpilotstudy
AT sunilmhaske effectivenessofcardiopulmonaryphysiotherapyversuspronepositioningonrespiratoryfunctionsinventilatedneonatesarandomizedcontrolledpilotstudy
_version_ 1725821360471539712