Distractor suppression when attention fails: behavioral evidence for a flexible selective attention mechanism.

Despite consistent evidence showing that attention is a multifaceted mechanism that can operate at multiple levels of processing depending on the structure and demands of the task, investigations of the attentional blink phenomenon have consistently shown that the impairment in reporting the second...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: James C Elliott, Barry Giesbrecht
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126203
id doaj-fd675d99dda945478eebaf36a02b7bdc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fd675d99dda945478eebaf36a02b7bdc2021-03-03T20:05:41ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01104e012620310.1371/journal.pone.0126203Distractor suppression when attention fails: behavioral evidence for a flexible selective attention mechanism.James C ElliottBarry GiesbrechtDespite consistent evidence showing that attention is a multifaceted mechanism that can operate at multiple levels of processing depending on the structure and demands of the task, investigations of the attentional blink phenomenon have consistently shown that the impairment in reporting the second of two targets typically occurs at a late, or post-perceptual, stage of processing. This suggests that the attentional blink phenomenon may represent the operation of a unique attentional mechanism that is not as flexible as other attentional mechanisms. To test whether the attentional blink is a fixed or flexible phenomenon, we manipulated first target task demands (i.e., difficulty) and measured the influence this had on processing a subsequently presented distractor and the second target. If the attentional blink represents a mechanism that is fixed and consistently fails at a single stage of processing, then manipulations of task difficulty should not affect distractor processing. However, if the attentional blink represents a more multifaceted and flexible mechanism, then task difficulty should modulate distractor processing. The results revealed that distractor processing during the AB was attenuated under high task difficulty. In addition, unlike previous studies, we failed to find a correlation between distractor processing and the severity of the attentional blink. Using a simulation, we demonstrate that the previously reported correlations may have been spurious and due to using variables that were not independent. Overall, the present results support the conclusion that the selectivity of attention during the AB is flexible and depends on the structure and demands of the task.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126203
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author James C Elliott
Barry Giesbrecht
spellingShingle James C Elliott
Barry Giesbrecht
Distractor suppression when attention fails: behavioral evidence for a flexible selective attention mechanism.
PLoS ONE
author_facet James C Elliott
Barry Giesbrecht
author_sort James C Elliott
title Distractor suppression when attention fails: behavioral evidence for a flexible selective attention mechanism.
title_short Distractor suppression when attention fails: behavioral evidence for a flexible selective attention mechanism.
title_full Distractor suppression when attention fails: behavioral evidence for a flexible selective attention mechanism.
title_fullStr Distractor suppression when attention fails: behavioral evidence for a flexible selective attention mechanism.
title_full_unstemmed Distractor suppression when attention fails: behavioral evidence for a flexible selective attention mechanism.
title_sort distractor suppression when attention fails: behavioral evidence for a flexible selective attention mechanism.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Despite consistent evidence showing that attention is a multifaceted mechanism that can operate at multiple levels of processing depending on the structure and demands of the task, investigations of the attentional blink phenomenon have consistently shown that the impairment in reporting the second of two targets typically occurs at a late, or post-perceptual, stage of processing. This suggests that the attentional blink phenomenon may represent the operation of a unique attentional mechanism that is not as flexible as other attentional mechanisms. To test whether the attentional blink is a fixed or flexible phenomenon, we manipulated first target task demands (i.e., difficulty) and measured the influence this had on processing a subsequently presented distractor and the second target. If the attentional blink represents a mechanism that is fixed and consistently fails at a single stage of processing, then manipulations of task difficulty should not affect distractor processing. However, if the attentional blink represents a more multifaceted and flexible mechanism, then task difficulty should modulate distractor processing. The results revealed that distractor processing during the AB was attenuated under high task difficulty. In addition, unlike previous studies, we failed to find a correlation between distractor processing and the severity of the attentional blink. Using a simulation, we demonstrate that the previously reported correlations may have been spurious and due to using variables that were not independent. Overall, the present results support the conclusion that the selectivity of attention during the AB is flexible and depends on the structure and demands of the task.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126203
work_keys_str_mv AT jamescelliott distractorsuppressionwhenattentionfailsbehavioralevidenceforaflexibleselectiveattentionmechanism
AT barrygiesbrecht distractorsuppressionwhenattentionfailsbehavioralevidenceforaflexibleselectiveattentionmechanism
_version_ 1714824155534196736