Validation of the EGSIEM GRACE Gravity Fields Using GNSS Coordinate Timeseries and In-Situ Ocean Bottom Pressure Records
Over the 15 years of the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) mission, various data processing approaches were developed to derive time-series of global gravity fields based on sensor observations acquired from the two spacecrafts. In this paper, we compare GRACE-based mass anomalies prov...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2018-12-01
|
Series: | Remote Sensing |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/10/12/1976 |
id |
doaj-fd664bebcd6d4181a97c86f258d63610 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-fd664bebcd6d4181a97c86f258d636102020-11-25T00:45:22ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922018-12-011012197610.3390/rs10121976rs10121976Validation of the EGSIEM GRACE Gravity Fields Using GNSS Coordinate Timeseries and In-Situ Ocean Bottom Pressure RecordsQiang Chen0Lea Poropat1Liangjing Zhang2Henryk Dobslaw3Matthias Weigelt4Tonie van Dam5Geophysics Laboratory, Faculty of Science, Technology and Communication, University of Luxembourg, 4365 Luxembourg, LuxembourgGFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, 14473 Potsdam, GermanyGFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, 14473 Potsdam, GermanyGFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, 14473 Potsdam, GermanyInstitute of Geodesy, Leibniz University of Hannover, 30167 Hannover, GermanyGeophysics Laboratory, Faculty of Science, Technology and Communication, University of Luxembourg, 4365 Luxembourg, LuxembourgOver the 15 years of the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) mission, various data processing approaches were developed to derive time-series of global gravity fields based on sensor observations acquired from the two spacecrafts. In this paper, we compare GRACE-based mass anomalies provided by various processing groups against Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) station coordinate time-series and in-situ observations of ocean bottom pressure. In addition to the conventional GRACE-based global geopotential models from the main processing centers, we focus particularly on combined gravity field solutions generated within the Horizon2020 project European Gravity Service for Improved Emergency Management (EGSIEM). Although two validation techniques are fully independent from each other, it is demonstrated that they confirm each other to a large extent. Through the validation, we show that the EGSIEM combined long-term monthly solutions are comparable to CSR RL05 and ITSG2016, and better than the other three considered GRACE monthly solutions AIUB RL02, GFZ RL05a, and JPL RL05.1. Depending on the GNSS products, up to 25.6% mean Weighted Root-Mean-Square (WRMS) reduction is obtained when comparing GRACE to the ITRF2014 residuals over 236 GNSS stations. In addition, we also observe remarkable agreement at the annual period between GNSS and GRACE with up to 73% median WRMS reduction when comparing GRACE to the 312 EGSIEM-reprocessed GNSS time series. While the correspondence between GRACE and ocean bottom pressure data is overall much smaller due to lower signal to noise ratio over the oceans than over the continents, up to 50% agreement is found between them in some regions. The results fully confirm the conclusions found using GNSS.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/10/12/1976EGSIEMGRACEcombined solutionsvalidationGNSS time seriesin-situ OBP records |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Qiang Chen Lea Poropat Liangjing Zhang Henryk Dobslaw Matthias Weigelt Tonie van Dam |
spellingShingle |
Qiang Chen Lea Poropat Liangjing Zhang Henryk Dobslaw Matthias Weigelt Tonie van Dam Validation of the EGSIEM GRACE Gravity Fields Using GNSS Coordinate Timeseries and In-Situ Ocean Bottom Pressure Records Remote Sensing EGSIEM GRACE combined solutions validation GNSS time series in-situ OBP records |
author_facet |
Qiang Chen Lea Poropat Liangjing Zhang Henryk Dobslaw Matthias Weigelt Tonie van Dam |
author_sort |
Qiang Chen |
title |
Validation of the EGSIEM GRACE Gravity Fields Using GNSS Coordinate Timeseries and In-Situ Ocean Bottom Pressure Records |
title_short |
Validation of the EGSIEM GRACE Gravity Fields Using GNSS Coordinate Timeseries and In-Situ Ocean Bottom Pressure Records |
title_full |
Validation of the EGSIEM GRACE Gravity Fields Using GNSS Coordinate Timeseries and In-Situ Ocean Bottom Pressure Records |
title_fullStr |
Validation of the EGSIEM GRACE Gravity Fields Using GNSS Coordinate Timeseries and In-Situ Ocean Bottom Pressure Records |
title_full_unstemmed |
Validation of the EGSIEM GRACE Gravity Fields Using GNSS Coordinate Timeseries and In-Situ Ocean Bottom Pressure Records |
title_sort |
validation of the egsiem grace gravity fields using gnss coordinate timeseries and in-situ ocean bottom pressure records |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Remote Sensing |
issn |
2072-4292 |
publishDate |
2018-12-01 |
description |
Over the 15 years of the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) mission, various data processing approaches were developed to derive time-series of global gravity fields based on sensor observations acquired from the two spacecrafts. In this paper, we compare GRACE-based mass anomalies provided by various processing groups against Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) station coordinate time-series and in-situ observations of ocean bottom pressure. In addition to the conventional GRACE-based global geopotential models from the main processing centers, we focus particularly on combined gravity field solutions generated within the Horizon2020 project European Gravity Service for Improved Emergency Management (EGSIEM). Although two validation techniques are fully independent from each other, it is demonstrated that they confirm each other to a large extent. Through the validation, we show that the EGSIEM combined long-term monthly solutions are comparable to CSR RL05 and ITSG2016, and better than the other three considered GRACE monthly solutions AIUB RL02, GFZ RL05a, and JPL RL05.1. Depending on the GNSS products, up to 25.6% mean Weighted Root-Mean-Square (WRMS) reduction is obtained when comparing GRACE to the ITRF2014 residuals over 236 GNSS stations. In addition, we also observe remarkable agreement at the annual period between GNSS and GRACE with up to 73% median WRMS reduction when comparing GRACE to the 312 EGSIEM-reprocessed GNSS time series. While the correspondence between GRACE and ocean bottom pressure data is overall much smaller due to lower signal to noise ratio over the oceans than over the continents, up to 50% agreement is found between them in some regions. The results fully confirm the conclusions found using GNSS. |
topic |
EGSIEM GRACE combined solutions validation GNSS time series in-situ OBP records |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/10/12/1976 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT qiangchen validationoftheegsiemgracegravityfieldsusinggnsscoordinatetimeseriesandinsituoceanbottompressurerecords AT leaporopat validationoftheegsiemgracegravityfieldsusinggnsscoordinatetimeseriesandinsituoceanbottompressurerecords AT liangjingzhang validationoftheegsiemgracegravityfieldsusinggnsscoordinatetimeseriesandinsituoceanbottompressurerecords AT henrykdobslaw validationoftheegsiemgracegravityfieldsusinggnsscoordinatetimeseriesandinsituoceanbottompressurerecords AT matthiasweigelt validationoftheegsiemgracegravityfieldsusinggnsscoordinatetimeseriesandinsituoceanbottompressurerecords AT tonievandam validationoftheegsiemgracegravityfieldsusinggnsscoordinatetimeseriesandinsituoceanbottompressurerecords |
_version_ |
1725270618194051072 |