Court Translation and Interpreting in Times of “the War on Terror”: The case of Taysir Alony

The case of Taysir Alony, the Al-Jazeera reporter who was imprisoned because of alleged collaboration with a terrorist organisation, raises several questions about the situation of police and court translation and interpreting in Spain. Alony and his co-defendants’ indictments were based, at least p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mustapha Taibi, Anne Martin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Western Sydney University 2012-10-01
Series:Translation and Interpreting : the International Journal of Translation and Interpreting Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.trans-int.org/index.php/transint/article/view/194/99
id doaj-fd5d937f4f1148398e81b070b81091d4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fd5d937f4f1148398e81b070b81091d42020-11-25T03:31:11ZengWestern Sydney UniversityTranslation and Interpreting : the International Journal of Translation and Interpreting Research1836-93242012-10-0141Court Translation and Interpreting in Times of “the War on Terror”: The case of Taysir AlonyMustapha TaibiAnne MartinThe case of Taysir Alony, the Al-Jazeera reporter who was imprisoned because of alleged collaboration with a terrorist organisation, raises several questions about the situation of police and court translation and interpreting in Spain. Alony and his co-defendants’ indictments were based, at least partially, on tapped conversations which were translated literally by verbatim translators or translators who did not belong to the same speech community as the speakers. Moreover, parts of the translated conversations and documents were framed in a manner that created a climate conducive to conviction. Given the context of “the War on Terror” in which the translations and the “evidence” were interpreted, this case raises questions such as interpretation vs. interpreting, the translation of culture and the role of the translator/interpreter. This paper scrutinises these questions taking into consideration the historical, political and ideological context of the case. Using some instances of verbatim, manipulated or reframed translation, it is argued that the dominant discourse on “the War on Terror” manages to construct a narrative that serves its interests — either through indoctrinated translators or blatant manipulation. http://www.trans-int.org/index.php/transint/article/view/194/99court translationideologymanipulationculturerole.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mustapha Taibi
Anne Martin
spellingShingle Mustapha Taibi
Anne Martin
Court Translation and Interpreting in Times of “the War on Terror”: The case of Taysir Alony
Translation and Interpreting : the International Journal of Translation and Interpreting Research
court translation
ideology
manipulation
culture
role.
author_facet Mustapha Taibi
Anne Martin
author_sort Mustapha Taibi
title Court Translation and Interpreting in Times of “the War on Terror”: The case of Taysir Alony
title_short Court Translation and Interpreting in Times of “the War on Terror”: The case of Taysir Alony
title_full Court Translation and Interpreting in Times of “the War on Terror”: The case of Taysir Alony
title_fullStr Court Translation and Interpreting in Times of “the War on Terror”: The case of Taysir Alony
title_full_unstemmed Court Translation and Interpreting in Times of “the War on Terror”: The case of Taysir Alony
title_sort court translation and interpreting in times of “the war on terror”: the case of taysir alony
publisher Western Sydney University
series Translation and Interpreting : the International Journal of Translation and Interpreting Research
issn 1836-9324
publishDate 2012-10-01
description The case of Taysir Alony, the Al-Jazeera reporter who was imprisoned because of alleged collaboration with a terrorist organisation, raises several questions about the situation of police and court translation and interpreting in Spain. Alony and his co-defendants’ indictments were based, at least partially, on tapped conversations which were translated literally by verbatim translators or translators who did not belong to the same speech community as the speakers. Moreover, parts of the translated conversations and documents were framed in a manner that created a climate conducive to conviction. Given the context of “the War on Terror” in which the translations and the “evidence” were interpreted, this case raises questions such as interpretation vs. interpreting, the translation of culture and the role of the translator/interpreter. This paper scrutinises these questions taking into consideration the historical, political and ideological context of the case. Using some instances of verbatim, manipulated or reframed translation, it is argued that the dominant discourse on “the War on Terror” manages to construct a narrative that serves its interests — either through indoctrinated translators or blatant manipulation.
topic court translation
ideology
manipulation
culture
role.
url http://www.trans-int.org/index.php/transint/article/view/194/99
work_keys_str_mv AT mustaphataibi courttranslationandinterpretingintimesofthewaronterrorthecaseoftaysiralony
AT annemartin courttranslationandinterpretingintimesofthewaronterrorthecaseoftaysiralony
_version_ 1724573105558388736