Establishing thresholds for important benefits considering the harms of screening interventions

Context and objective Standards for clinical practice guidelines require explicit statements regarding how values and preferences influence recommendations. However, no cancer screening guideline has addressed the key question of what magnitude of benefit people require to undergo screening, given i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lise Mørkved Helsingen, Reed Alexander Siemieniuk
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2020-12-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/12/e037854.full
id doaj-fd556eaaf79b406b90c1955497792234
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fd556eaaf79b406b90c19554977922342021-08-19T07:00:06ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552020-12-01101210.1136/bmjopen-2020-037854Establishing thresholds for important benefits considering the harms of screening interventionsLise Mørkved Helsingen0Reed Alexander Siemieniuk1Clinical Effectiveness Research, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, NorwayDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, CanadaContext and objective Standards for clinical practice guidelines require explicit statements regarding how values and preferences influence recommendations. However, no cancer screening guideline has addressed the key question of what magnitude of benefit people require to undergo screening, given its harms and burdens. This article describes the development of a new method for guideline developers to address this key question in the absence of high-quality evidence from published literature.Summary of method The new method was developed and applied in the context of a recent BMJ Rapid Recommendation clinical practice guideline for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. First, we presented the guideline panel with harms and burdens (derived from a systematic review) associated with the CRC screening tests under consideration. Second, each panel member completed surveys documenting their views of expected benefits on CRC incidence and mortality that people would require to accept the harms and burdens of screening. Third, the panel discussed results of the surveys and agreed on thresholds for benefits at which the majority of people would choose screening. During these three steps, the panel had no access to the actual benefits of the screening tests. In step four, the panel was presented with screening test benefits derived from a systematic review of clinical trials and microsimulation modelling. The thresholds derived through steps one to three were applied to these benefits, and directly informed the panel’s recommendations.Conclusion We present the development and application of a new, four-step method enabling incorporation of explicit and transparent judgements of values and preferences in a screening guideline. Guideline panels should establish their view regarding the magnitude of required benefit, given burdens and harms, before they review screening benefits and make their recommendations accordingly. Making informed screening decisions requires transparency in values and preferences judgements that our new method greatly facilitates.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/12/e037854.full
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lise Mørkved Helsingen
Reed Alexander Siemieniuk
spellingShingle Lise Mørkved Helsingen
Reed Alexander Siemieniuk
Establishing thresholds for important benefits considering the harms of screening interventions
BMJ Open
author_facet Lise Mørkved Helsingen
Reed Alexander Siemieniuk
author_sort Lise Mørkved Helsingen
title Establishing thresholds for important benefits considering the harms of screening interventions
title_short Establishing thresholds for important benefits considering the harms of screening interventions
title_full Establishing thresholds for important benefits considering the harms of screening interventions
title_fullStr Establishing thresholds for important benefits considering the harms of screening interventions
title_full_unstemmed Establishing thresholds for important benefits considering the harms of screening interventions
title_sort establishing thresholds for important benefits considering the harms of screening interventions
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
series BMJ Open
issn 2044-6055
publishDate 2020-12-01
description Context and objective Standards for clinical practice guidelines require explicit statements regarding how values and preferences influence recommendations. However, no cancer screening guideline has addressed the key question of what magnitude of benefit people require to undergo screening, given its harms and burdens. This article describes the development of a new method for guideline developers to address this key question in the absence of high-quality evidence from published literature.Summary of method The new method was developed and applied in the context of a recent BMJ Rapid Recommendation clinical practice guideline for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. First, we presented the guideline panel with harms and burdens (derived from a systematic review) associated with the CRC screening tests under consideration. Second, each panel member completed surveys documenting their views of expected benefits on CRC incidence and mortality that people would require to accept the harms and burdens of screening. Third, the panel discussed results of the surveys and agreed on thresholds for benefits at which the majority of people would choose screening. During these three steps, the panel had no access to the actual benefits of the screening tests. In step four, the panel was presented with screening test benefits derived from a systematic review of clinical trials and microsimulation modelling. The thresholds derived through steps one to three were applied to these benefits, and directly informed the panel’s recommendations.Conclusion We present the development and application of a new, four-step method enabling incorporation of explicit and transparent judgements of values and preferences in a screening guideline. Guideline panels should establish their view regarding the magnitude of required benefit, given burdens and harms, before they review screening benefits and make their recommendations accordingly. Making informed screening decisions requires transparency in values and preferences judgements that our new method greatly facilitates.
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/12/e037854.full
work_keys_str_mv AT lisemørkvedhelsingen establishingthresholdsforimportantbenefitsconsideringtheharmsofscreeninginterventions
AT reedalexandersiemieniuk establishingthresholdsforimportantbenefitsconsideringtheharmsofscreeninginterventions
_version_ 1721202583790419968