International Management, Should We Abandon the Myth of Cultural Hybridity? A Re-examination of the Contribution of Postcolonial and Decolonial Approaches

The postcolonial and decolonial approaches open the way for a rich analysis of the material and cultural conditions in which international management operates, is spread, interpreted, and implemented. They also offer food for thought on the possibilities, tensions, and resistance associated with rei...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hèla Yousfi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Association International de Management Stratégique (AIMS) 2021-03-01
Series:M@n@gement
Online Access:https://management-aims.com/index.php/mgmt/article/view/6309/13398
id doaj-fd487d1b944d40468d7043f3825d6206
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fd487d1b944d40468d7043f3825d62062021-03-27T14:41:33ZengAssociation International de Management Stratégique (AIMS)M@n@gement1286-46922021-03-0124011010.37725/mgmt.v24i1.63096309International Management, Should We Abandon the Myth of Cultural Hybridity? A Re-examination of the Contribution of Postcolonial and Decolonial ApproachesHèla Yousfi0Associate Professor, Université Paris-Dauphine - PSL Research University, CNRS, UMR 7088, DRM, 75016 PARIS, FranceThe postcolonial and decolonial approaches open the way for a rich analysis of the material and cultural conditions in which international management operates, is spread, interpreted, and implemented. They also offer food for thought on the possibilities, tensions, and resistance associated with reinventing alternative organizations more respectful of the dignity of all, while still providing knowledge that is socially and politically useful for oppressed and marginalized groups. Nevertheless, and despite their undeniable contribution to the theoretical development of critical approaches in international management, these perspectives are faced with challenges and difficulties in both intellectual and empirical terms. In this article, I suggest a series of ways forward, which might allow for the renewal of the critical fruitfulness of this intellectual and political project, crucial to face the contemporary challenges of international management.https://management-aims.com/index.php/mgmt/article/view/6309/13398
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hèla Yousfi
spellingShingle Hèla Yousfi
International Management, Should We Abandon the Myth of Cultural Hybridity? A Re-examination of the Contribution of Postcolonial and Decolonial Approaches
M@n@gement
author_facet Hèla Yousfi
author_sort Hèla Yousfi
title International Management, Should We Abandon the Myth of Cultural Hybridity? A Re-examination of the Contribution of Postcolonial and Decolonial Approaches
title_short International Management, Should We Abandon the Myth of Cultural Hybridity? A Re-examination of the Contribution of Postcolonial and Decolonial Approaches
title_full International Management, Should We Abandon the Myth of Cultural Hybridity? A Re-examination of the Contribution of Postcolonial and Decolonial Approaches
title_fullStr International Management, Should We Abandon the Myth of Cultural Hybridity? A Re-examination of the Contribution of Postcolonial and Decolonial Approaches
title_full_unstemmed International Management, Should We Abandon the Myth of Cultural Hybridity? A Re-examination of the Contribution of Postcolonial and Decolonial Approaches
title_sort international management, should we abandon the myth of cultural hybridity? a re-examination of the contribution of postcolonial and decolonial approaches
publisher Association International de Management Stratégique (AIMS)
series M@n@gement
issn 1286-4692
publishDate 2021-03-01
description The postcolonial and decolonial approaches open the way for a rich analysis of the material and cultural conditions in which international management operates, is spread, interpreted, and implemented. They also offer food for thought on the possibilities, tensions, and resistance associated with reinventing alternative organizations more respectful of the dignity of all, while still providing knowledge that is socially and politically useful for oppressed and marginalized groups. Nevertheless, and despite their undeniable contribution to the theoretical development of critical approaches in international management, these perspectives are faced with challenges and difficulties in both intellectual and empirical terms. In this article, I suggest a series of ways forward, which might allow for the renewal of the critical fruitfulness of this intellectual and political project, crucial to face the contemporary challenges of international management.
url https://management-aims.com/index.php/mgmt/article/view/6309/13398
work_keys_str_mv AT helayousfi internationalmanagementshouldweabandonthemythofculturalhybridityareexaminationofthecontributionofpostcolonialanddecolonialapproaches
_version_ 1724201121450295296