The “Real World”? Effects of Online Communication about Prostate Cancer on Offline Communication

Introduction: Online peer-to-peer social support programs are based on the premise that support from others who have been through a similar experience can help reduce the negative impacts of disease. Such support programs are increasingly found online, but how these conversations translate into real...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amelia Burke-Garcia, Kevin B. Wright
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2018-01-01
Series:Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S200103701830103X
id doaj-fd40677980384ce6b2fe67c42b44bf95
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fd40677980384ce6b2fe67c42b44bf952020-11-24T23:49:10ZengElsevierComputational and Structural Biotechnology Journal2001-03702018-01-0116388395The “Real World”? Effects of Online Communication about Prostate Cancer on Offline CommunicationAmelia Burke-Garcia0Kevin B. Wright1Westat, 1600 Research Blvd, Rockville, MD 20850, United States; George Mason University, 4400 University Drive, Fairfax, VA 22030, United States; Corresponding author at: Westat, 1600 Research Blvd, Rockville, MD 20850, United States.George Mason University, 4400 University Drive, Fairfax, VA 22030, United StatesIntroduction: Online peer-to-peer social support programs are based on the premise that support from others who have been through a similar experience can help reduce the negative impacts of disease. Such support programs are increasingly found online, but how these conversations translate into real world interactions about health concerns is currently not well understood. Methods: Grounded in social network theory, this formative study explored how participants in an online prostate cancer community comprised of patients and their families translate their online conversations into offline ones. A survey was designed and fielded, and received 157 complete responses. Results: Results support prior research findings that these offline conversations are primarily information-oriented (n = 105) and extend them by the finding that members of online prostate cancer social support communities do, in fact, share information obtained online with others offline (n = 103). Family members appear to be primary receivers of this information (n = 121) while health care providers are not, which may impact treatment and care. Conclusions: The opportunity to tie more concretely online messages with offline conversations is of critical importance and interest. Recommendations are presented for future research. Keywords: Prostate cancer, Online communities, Social networks, Interpersonal communication, Social mediahttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S200103701830103X
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Amelia Burke-Garcia
Kevin B. Wright
spellingShingle Amelia Burke-Garcia
Kevin B. Wright
The “Real World”? Effects of Online Communication about Prostate Cancer on Offline Communication
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
author_facet Amelia Burke-Garcia
Kevin B. Wright
author_sort Amelia Burke-Garcia
title The “Real World”? Effects of Online Communication about Prostate Cancer on Offline Communication
title_short The “Real World”? Effects of Online Communication about Prostate Cancer on Offline Communication
title_full The “Real World”? Effects of Online Communication about Prostate Cancer on Offline Communication
title_fullStr The “Real World”? Effects of Online Communication about Prostate Cancer on Offline Communication
title_full_unstemmed The “Real World”? Effects of Online Communication about Prostate Cancer on Offline Communication
title_sort “real world”? effects of online communication about prostate cancer on offline communication
publisher Elsevier
series Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
issn 2001-0370
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Introduction: Online peer-to-peer social support programs are based on the premise that support from others who have been through a similar experience can help reduce the negative impacts of disease. Such support programs are increasingly found online, but how these conversations translate into real world interactions about health concerns is currently not well understood. Methods: Grounded in social network theory, this formative study explored how participants in an online prostate cancer community comprised of patients and their families translate their online conversations into offline ones. A survey was designed and fielded, and received 157 complete responses. Results: Results support prior research findings that these offline conversations are primarily information-oriented (n = 105) and extend them by the finding that members of online prostate cancer social support communities do, in fact, share information obtained online with others offline (n = 103). Family members appear to be primary receivers of this information (n = 121) while health care providers are not, which may impact treatment and care. Conclusions: The opportunity to tie more concretely online messages with offline conversations is of critical importance and interest. Recommendations are presented for future research. Keywords: Prostate cancer, Online communities, Social networks, Interpersonal communication, Social media
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S200103701830103X
work_keys_str_mv AT ameliaburkegarcia therealworldeffectsofonlinecommunicationaboutprostatecanceronofflinecommunication
AT kevinbwright therealworldeffectsofonlinecommunicationaboutprostatecanceronofflinecommunication
AT ameliaburkegarcia realworldeffectsofonlinecommunicationaboutprostatecanceronofflinecommunication
AT kevinbwright realworldeffectsofonlinecommunicationaboutprostatecanceronofflinecommunication
_version_ 1725483712370442240