MI Double Feature: Multiple Imputation to Address Nonresponse and Rounding Errors in Income Questions

Obtaining reliable income information in surveys is difficult for two reasons. On the one hand, many survey respondents consider income to be sensitive information and thus are reluctant to answer questions regarding their income. If those survey participants that do not provide information on thei...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joerg Drechsler, Hans Kiesl, Matthias Speidel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Austrian Statistical Society 2015-04-01
Series:Austrian Journal of Statistics
Online Access:http://www.ajs.or.at/index.php/ajs/article/view/77
id doaj-fd3f0f1a99ed439b8880e4d4a0a13ed1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fd3f0f1a99ed439b8880e4d4a0a13ed12021-04-22T12:35:06ZengAustrian Statistical SocietyAustrian Journal of Statistics1026-597X2015-04-0144210.17713/ajs.v44i2.7735MI Double Feature: Multiple Imputation to Address Nonresponse and Rounding Errors in Income QuestionsJoerg Drechsler0Hans KieslMatthias Speidel1Institute for Employment ResearchKompetenzzentrum Empirische Methoden Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung der Bundesagentur für Arbeit Regensburger Str. 100 90478 Nürnberg Obtaining reliable income information in surveys is difficult for two reasons. On the one hand, many survey respondents consider income to be sensitive information and thus are reluctant to answer questions regarding their income. If those survey participants that do not provide information on their income are systematically different from the respondents - and there is ample of research indicating that they are - results based only on the observed income values will be misleading. On the other hand, respondents tend to round their income. Especially this second source of error is usually ignored when analyzing the income information. In a recent paper, Drechsler and Kiesl (2014) illustrated that inferences based on the collected information can be biased if the rounding is ignored and suggested a multiple imputation strategy to account for the rounding in reported income. In this paper we extend their approach to also address the nonresponse problem. We illustrate the approach using the household income variable from the German panel study "Labor Market and Social Security''. http://www.ajs.or.at/index.php/ajs/article/view/77
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Joerg Drechsler
Hans Kiesl
Matthias Speidel
spellingShingle Joerg Drechsler
Hans Kiesl
Matthias Speidel
MI Double Feature: Multiple Imputation to Address Nonresponse and Rounding Errors in Income Questions
Austrian Journal of Statistics
author_facet Joerg Drechsler
Hans Kiesl
Matthias Speidel
author_sort Joerg Drechsler
title MI Double Feature: Multiple Imputation to Address Nonresponse and Rounding Errors in Income Questions
title_short MI Double Feature: Multiple Imputation to Address Nonresponse and Rounding Errors in Income Questions
title_full MI Double Feature: Multiple Imputation to Address Nonresponse and Rounding Errors in Income Questions
title_fullStr MI Double Feature: Multiple Imputation to Address Nonresponse and Rounding Errors in Income Questions
title_full_unstemmed MI Double Feature: Multiple Imputation to Address Nonresponse and Rounding Errors in Income Questions
title_sort mi double feature: multiple imputation to address nonresponse and rounding errors in income questions
publisher Austrian Statistical Society
series Austrian Journal of Statistics
issn 1026-597X
publishDate 2015-04-01
description Obtaining reliable income information in surveys is difficult for two reasons. On the one hand, many survey respondents consider income to be sensitive information and thus are reluctant to answer questions regarding their income. If those survey participants that do not provide information on their income are systematically different from the respondents - and there is ample of research indicating that they are - results based only on the observed income values will be misleading. On the other hand, respondents tend to round their income. Especially this second source of error is usually ignored when analyzing the income information. In a recent paper, Drechsler and Kiesl (2014) illustrated that inferences based on the collected information can be biased if the rounding is ignored and suggested a multiple imputation strategy to account for the rounding in reported income. In this paper we extend their approach to also address the nonresponse problem. We illustrate the approach using the household income variable from the German panel study "Labor Market and Social Security''.
url http://www.ajs.or.at/index.php/ajs/article/view/77
work_keys_str_mv AT joergdrechsler midoublefeaturemultipleimputationtoaddressnonresponseandroundingerrorsinincomequestions
AT hanskiesl midoublefeaturemultipleimputationtoaddressnonresponseandroundingerrorsinincomequestions
AT matthiasspeidel midoublefeaturemultipleimputationtoaddressnonresponseandroundingerrorsinincomequestions
_version_ 1721514411940642816