Could Social Farming Be a Strategy to Support Food Sovereignty in Europe?

Food sovereignty (FS) aims to obtain value-added products in proximity agriculture (PA) in order to achieve food security in a country. Social farming (SF) can help to develop this PA as well as favoring integration of people at risk of social exclusion (RSE). The methodology includes a review of th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Antoni F. Tulla, Ana Vera
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-04-01
Series:Land
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/8/5/78
id doaj-fd3d5197ced94323abeddf56cb6af46a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fd3d5197ced94323abeddf56cb6af46a2020-11-25T01:33:14ZengMDPI AGLand2073-445X2019-04-01857810.3390/land8050078land8050078Could Social Farming Be a Strategy to Support Food Sovereignty in Europe?Antoni F. Tulla0Ana Vera1Department of Geography, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra (Barcelona), SpainDepartment of Geography, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra (Barcelona), SpainFood sovereignty (FS) aims to obtain value-added products in proximity agriculture (PA) in order to achieve food security in a country. Social farming (SF) can help to develop this PA as well as favoring integration of people at risk of social exclusion (RSE). The methodology includes a review of the literature, a survey of 161 SF projects in Catalonia, and ten selected in-depth interviews. “Social Return on Investment” (SROI) methodology is also applied to assess the efficiency of the projects analyzed. The results show the economic, social, and environmental viability of the majority of the SF projects which, also favored by FS and PA, allows the development of innovative experiences and sustainable forms of governance. SF has been carried out in different ways in European countries, although with the common aims of benefitting people at RSE, and using the natural environment and PA through projects basically promoted by Third Sector entities. Management of these projects is in the hands of foundations and non-profit companies making top-down decisions, and in cooperatives and associations, where decision-making is bottom-up. It can be concluded that the promotion of SF can favor PA, and therefore, FS in Europe.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/8/5/78CataloniaEuropefood sovereigntygovernancepeople at risk of social exclusionproximity agriculturesocial farmingsocial return on investmentThird Sector
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Antoni F. Tulla
Ana Vera
spellingShingle Antoni F. Tulla
Ana Vera
Could Social Farming Be a Strategy to Support Food Sovereignty in Europe?
Land
Catalonia
Europe
food sovereignty
governance
people at risk of social exclusion
proximity agriculture
social farming
social return on investment
Third Sector
author_facet Antoni F. Tulla
Ana Vera
author_sort Antoni F. Tulla
title Could Social Farming Be a Strategy to Support Food Sovereignty in Europe?
title_short Could Social Farming Be a Strategy to Support Food Sovereignty in Europe?
title_full Could Social Farming Be a Strategy to Support Food Sovereignty in Europe?
title_fullStr Could Social Farming Be a Strategy to Support Food Sovereignty in Europe?
title_full_unstemmed Could Social Farming Be a Strategy to Support Food Sovereignty in Europe?
title_sort could social farming be a strategy to support food sovereignty in europe?
publisher MDPI AG
series Land
issn 2073-445X
publishDate 2019-04-01
description Food sovereignty (FS) aims to obtain value-added products in proximity agriculture (PA) in order to achieve food security in a country. Social farming (SF) can help to develop this PA as well as favoring integration of people at risk of social exclusion (RSE). The methodology includes a review of the literature, a survey of 161 SF projects in Catalonia, and ten selected in-depth interviews. “Social Return on Investment” (SROI) methodology is also applied to assess the efficiency of the projects analyzed. The results show the economic, social, and environmental viability of the majority of the SF projects which, also favored by FS and PA, allows the development of innovative experiences and sustainable forms of governance. SF has been carried out in different ways in European countries, although with the common aims of benefitting people at RSE, and using the natural environment and PA through projects basically promoted by Third Sector entities. Management of these projects is in the hands of foundations and non-profit companies making top-down decisions, and in cooperatives and associations, where decision-making is bottom-up. It can be concluded that the promotion of SF can favor PA, and therefore, FS in Europe.
topic Catalonia
Europe
food sovereignty
governance
people at risk of social exclusion
proximity agriculture
social farming
social return on investment
Third Sector
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/8/5/78
work_keys_str_mv AT antoniftulla couldsocialfarmingbeastrategytosupportfoodsovereigntyineurope
AT anavera couldsocialfarmingbeastrategytosupportfoodsovereigntyineurope
_version_ 1725078589319151616