The quality case for information technology in healthcare

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>As described in the Institute of Medicine's <it>Crossing the Quality Chasm</it> report, the quality of health care in the U.S. today leaves much to be desired.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>One maj...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bates David W
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2002-10-01
Series:BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6947/2/7
id doaj-fd362ffac11041f9a9b46edf69fdc56a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fd362ffac11041f9a9b46edf69fdc56a2020-11-24T21:28:55ZengBMCBMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making1472-69472002-10-0121710.1186/1472-6947-2-7The quality case for information technology in healthcareBates David W<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>As described in the Institute of Medicine's <it>Crossing the Quality Chasm</it> report, the quality of health care in the U.S. today leaves much to be desired.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>One major opportunity for improving quality relates to increasing the use of information technology, or IT. Health care organizations currently invest less in IT than in any other information-intensive industry, and not surprisingly current systems are relatively primitive, compared with industries such as banking or aviation. Nonetheless, a number of organizations have demonstrated that quality can be substantially improved in a variety of ways if IT use is increased in ways that improve care. Specifically, computerization of processes that are error-prone and computerized decision support may substantially improve both efficiency and quality, as well as dramatically facilitate quality measurement. This report discusses the current levels of IT and quality in health care, how quality improvement and management are currently done, the evidence that more IT might be helpful, a vision of the future, and the barriers to getting there.</p> <p>Summary</p> <p>This report suggests that there are five key policy domains that need to be addressed: standards, incentives, security and confidentiality, professional involvement, and research, with financial incentives representing the single most important lever.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6947/2/7
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bates David W
spellingShingle Bates David W
The quality case for information technology in healthcare
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
author_facet Bates David W
author_sort Bates David W
title The quality case for information technology in healthcare
title_short The quality case for information technology in healthcare
title_full The quality case for information technology in healthcare
title_fullStr The quality case for information technology in healthcare
title_full_unstemmed The quality case for information technology in healthcare
title_sort quality case for information technology in healthcare
publisher BMC
series BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
issn 1472-6947
publishDate 2002-10-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>As described in the Institute of Medicine's <it>Crossing the Quality Chasm</it> report, the quality of health care in the U.S. today leaves much to be desired.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>One major opportunity for improving quality relates to increasing the use of information technology, or IT. Health care organizations currently invest less in IT than in any other information-intensive industry, and not surprisingly current systems are relatively primitive, compared with industries such as banking or aviation. Nonetheless, a number of organizations have demonstrated that quality can be substantially improved in a variety of ways if IT use is increased in ways that improve care. Specifically, computerization of processes that are error-prone and computerized decision support may substantially improve both efficiency and quality, as well as dramatically facilitate quality measurement. This report discusses the current levels of IT and quality in health care, how quality improvement and management are currently done, the evidence that more IT might be helpful, a vision of the future, and the barriers to getting there.</p> <p>Summary</p> <p>This report suggests that there are five key policy domains that need to be addressed: standards, incentives, security and confidentiality, professional involvement, and research, with financial incentives representing the single most important lever.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6947/2/7
work_keys_str_mv AT batesdavidw thequalitycaseforinformationtechnologyinhealthcare
AT batesdavidw qualitycaseforinformationtechnologyinhealthcare
_version_ 1725968551758528512