Non siamo liberi di non innamorarci. Conversazione con Semir Zeki
The interview is based on some thesis of Semir Zeki’s last book, Splendours and Miseries of the Brain. The founder of the International Institute of Neuroaesthetics (London 2001) wrote that a very different kind of knowledge can be acquired by the brain in the experience of art. It seems that he rec...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Rosenberg & Sellier
2012-04-01
|
Series: | Rivista di Estetica |
Online Access: | http://journals.openedition.org/estetica/1727 |
id |
doaj-fd333bdc84c24dccb3353fdda4e5d4d0 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-fd333bdc84c24dccb3353fdda4e5d4d02020-11-24T23:21:41ZengRosenberg & SellierRivista di Estetica0035-62122421-58642012-04-014937738410.4000/estetica.1727Non siamo liberi di non innamorarci. Conversazione con Semir ZekiAnna Li VigniThe interview is based on some thesis of Semir Zeki’s last book, Splendours and Miseries of the Brain. The founder of the International Institute of Neuroaesthetics (London 2001) wrote that a very different kind of knowledge can be acquired by the brain in the experience of art. It seems that he recognizes there can be a kind of “intelligence” in perception, while he writes about microcosciences of perception being located in the same areas where the information coming from the outside is elaborated and perceived. He explains the distinction between inherited “concepts” and acquired synthetic “concepts” of the visual brain. The theory of acquired concepts could also help in explaining the problem of taste: it seems that what we like in our lives is determined by the result (the synthesis) of those probabilities coming from our acquired synthetic brain concepts. Thus there wouldn’t be any free will in our aesthetical and love choices.http://journals.openedition.org/estetica/1727 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Anna Li Vigni |
spellingShingle |
Anna Li Vigni Non siamo liberi di non innamorarci. Conversazione con Semir Zeki Rivista di Estetica |
author_facet |
Anna Li Vigni |
author_sort |
Anna Li Vigni |
title |
Non siamo liberi di non innamorarci. Conversazione con Semir Zeki |
title_short |
Non siamo liberi di non innamorarci. Conversazione con Semir Zeki |
title_full |
Non siamo liberi di non innamorarci. Conversazione con Semir Zeki |
title_fullStr |
Non siamo liberi di non innamorarci. Conversazione con Semir Zeki |
title_full_unstemmed |
Non siamo liberi di non innamorarci. Conversazione con Semir Zeki |
title_sort |
non siamo liberi di non innamorarci. conversazione con semir zeki |
publisher |
Rosenberg & Sellier |
series |
Rivista di Estetica |
issn |
0035-6212 2421-5864 |
publishDate |
2012-04-01 |
description |
The interview is based on some thesis of Semir Zeki’s last book, Splendours and Miseries of the Brain. The founder of the International Institute of Neuroaesthetics (London 2001) wrote that a very different kind of knowledge can be acquired by the brain in the experience of art. It seems that he recognizes there can be a kind of “intelligence” in perception, while he writes about microcosciences of perception being located in the same areas where the information coming from the outside is elaborated and perceived. He explains the distinction between inherited “concepts” and acquired synthetic “concepts” of the visual brain. The theory of acquired concepts could also help in explaining the problem of taste: it seems that what we like in our lives is determined by the result (the synthesis) of those probabilities coming from our acquired synthetic brain concepts. Thus there wouldn’t be any free will in our aesthetical and love choices. |
url |
http://journals.openedition.org/estetica/1727 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT annalivigni nonsiamoliberidinoninnamorarciconversazioneconsemirzeki |
_version_ |
1725570595848978432 |