Clinical Value of Virtual Reality versus 3D Printing in Congenital Heart Disease
Both three-dimensional (3D) printing and virtual reality (VR) are reported as being superior to the current visualization techniques in conveying more comprehensive visualization of congenital heart disease (CHD). However, little is known in terms of their clinical value in diagnostic assessment, me...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-06-01
|
Series: | Biomolecules |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2218-273X/11/6/884 |
id |
doaj-fd30cd4b55cc4e09a4858d8b73b2c04d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-fd30cd4b55cc4e09a4858d8b73b2c04d2021-07-01T00:09:36ZengMDPI AGBiomolecules2218-273X2021-06-011188488410.3390/biom11060884Clinical Value of Virtual Reality versus 3D Printing in Congenital Heart DiseaseIvan Lau0Ashu Gupta1Zhonghua Sun2Discipline of Medical Radiation Science, Curtin Medical School, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, AustraliaDepartment of Medical Imaging, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA 6150, AustraliaDiscipline of Medical Radiation Science, Curtin Medical School, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, AustraliaBoth three-dimensional (3D) printing and virtual reality (VR) are reported as being superior to the current visualization techniques in conveying more comprehensive visualization of congenital heart disease (CHD). However, little is known in terms of their clinical value in diagnostic assessment, medical education, and preoperative planning of CHD. This cross-sectional study aims to address these by involving 35 medical practitioners to subjectively evaluate VR visualization of four selected CHD cases in comparison with the corresponding 3D printed heart models (3DPHM). Six questionnaires were excluded due to incomplete sections, hence a total of 29 records were included for the analysis. The results showed both VR and 3D printed heart models were comparable in terms of the degree of realism. VR was perceived as more useful in medical education and preoperative planning compared to 3D printed heart models, although there was no significant difference in the ratings (<i>p</i> = 0.54 and 0.35, respectively). Twenty-one participants (72%) indicated both the VR and 3DPHM provided additional benefits compared to the conventional medical imaging visualizations. This study concludes the similar clinical value of both VR and 3DPHM in CHD, although further research is needed to involve more cardiac specialists for their views on the usefulness of these tools.https://www.mdpi.com/2218-273X/11/6/8843D printingvirtual realitycongenital heart diseasediagnosisvisualization |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ivan Lau Ashu Gupta Zhonghua Sun |
spellingShingle |
Ivan Lau Ashu Gupta Zhonghua Sun Clinical Value of Virtual Reality versus 3D Printing in Congenital Heart Disease Biomolecules 3D printing virtual reality congenital heart disease diagnosis visualization |
author_facet |
Ivan Lau Ashu Gupta Zhonghua Sun |
author_sort |
Ivan Lau |
title |
Clinical Value of Virtual Reality versus 3D Printing in Congenital Heart Disease |
title_short |
Clinical Value of Virtual Reality versus 3D Printing in Congenital Heart Disease |
title_full |
Clinical Value of Virtual Reality versus 3D Printing in Congenital Heart Disease |
title_fullStr |
Clinical Value of Virtual Reality versus 3D Printing in Congenital Heart Disease |
title_full_unstemmed |
Clinical Value of Virtual Reality versus 3D Printing in Congenital Heart Disease |
title_sort |
clinical value of virtual reality versus 3d printing in congenital heart disease |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Biomolecules |
issn |
2218-273X |
publishDate |
2021-06-01 |
description |
Both three-dimensional (3D) printing and virtual reality (VR) are reported as being superior to the current visualization techniques in conveying more comprehensive visualization of congenital heart disease (CHD). However, little is known in terms of their clinical value in diagnostic assessment, medical education, and preoperative planning of CHD. This cross-sectional study aims to address these by involving 35 medical practitioners to subjectively evaluate VR visualization of four selected CHD cases in comparison with the corresponding 3D printed heart models (3DPHM). Six questionnaires were excluded due to incomplete sections, hence a total of 29 records were included for the analysis. The results showed both VR and 3D printed heart models were comparable in terms of the degree of realism. VR was perceived as more useful in medical education and preoperative planning compared to 3D printed heart models, although there was no significant difference in the ratings (<i>p</i> = 0.54 and 0.35, respectively). Twenty-one participants (72%) indicated both the VR and 3DPHM provided additional benefits compared to the conventional medical imaging visualizations. This study concludes the similar clinical value of both VR and 3DPHM in CHD, although further research is needed to involve more cardiac specialists for their views on the usefulness of these tools. |
topic |
3D printing virtual reality congenital heart disease diagnosis visualization |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2218-273X/11/6/884 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ivanlau clinicalvalueofvirtualrealityversus3dprintingincongenitalheartdisease AT ashugupta clinicalvalueofvirtualrealityversus3dprintingincongenitalheartdisease AT zhonghuasun clinicalvalueofvirtualrealityversus3dprintingincongenitalheartdisease |
_version_ |
1721349400691736576 |