Methoden für die Religionswissenschaft
This article is inspired by two recent publications focused on the notion of methods in the (scientific) study of religion (Kurth and Lehmann 2011, Stausberg and Engler 2011). Introducing their central topics, we discuss the question of the institutional location of those methods and the role of ins...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Zeitschrift für junge Religionswissenschaft
2013-12-01
|
Series: | Zeitschrift für Junge Religionswissenschaft |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journals.openedition.org/zjr/279 |
id |
doaj-fd2ea904e3a14390959b7a7889b3abe8 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-fd2ea904e3a14390959b7a7889b3abe82020-11-24T23:30:43ZdeuZeitschrift für junge ReligionswissenschaftZeitschrift für Junge Religionswissenschaft1862-58862013-12-0110.4000/zjr.279Methoden für die ReligionswissenschaftSteffen FührdingThis article is inspired by two recent publications focused on the notion of methods in the (scientific) study of religion (Kurth and Lehmann 2011, Stausberg and Engler 2011). Introducing their central topics, we discuss the question of the institutional location of those methods and the role of instructing them. In order to be able to compete with other scientific disciplines, we issue the demand for a professionalization of instruction. Also, we warn not to succumb to a »structural sui generis problem«, i.e., although claiming to have overcome the phenomenology of religion, to conceptualize religion as a unique phenomenon.http://journals.openedition.org/zjr/279Study of ReligionMethodological TrainingProfessionalizationQualitative Research MethodsUniversity |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
deu |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Steffen Führding |
spellingShingle |
Steffen Führding Methoden für die Religionswissenschaft Zeitschrift für Junge Religionswissenschaft Study of Religion Methodological Training Professionalization Qualitative Research Methods University |
author_facet |
Steffen Führding |
author_sort |
Steffen Führding |
title |
Methoden für die Religionswissenschaft |
title_short |
Methoden für die Religionswissenschaft |
title_full |
Methoden für die Religionswissenschaft |
title_fullStr |
Methoden für die Religionswissenschaft |
title_full_unstemmed |
Methoden für die Religionswissenschaft |
title_sort |
methoden für die religionswissenschaft |
publisher |
Zeitschrift für junge Religionswissenschaft |
series |
Zeitschrift für Junge Religionswissenschaft |
issn |
1862-5886 |
publishDate |
2013-12-01 |
description |
This article is inspired by two recent publications focused on the notion of methods in the (scientific) study of religion (Kurth and Lehmann 2011, Stausberg and Engler 2011). Introducing their central topics, we discuss the question of the institutional location of those methods and the role of instructing them. In order to be able to compete with other scientific disciplines, we issue the demand for a professionalization of instruction. Also, we warn not to succumb to a »structural sui generis problem«, i.e., although claiming to have overcome the phenomenology of religion, to conceptualize religion as a unique phenomenon. |
topic |
Study of Religion Methodological Training Professionalization Qualitative Research Methods University |
url |
http://journals.openedition.org/zjr/279 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT steffenfuhrding methodenfurdiereligionswissenschaft |
_version_ |
1725540706328510464 |