The Challenge of Implementing the Marine Ecosystem Service Concept

The concept of ecosystem services has gained traction as a means of linking societal benefits to the underlying ecology and functioning of ecosystems, and is now frequently included in decision-making and legislation. Moving the ecosystem service concept from theory into practice is now crucial. How...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michael Townsend, Kate Davies, Nicholas Hanley, Judi E. Hewitt, Carolyn J. Lundquist, Andrew M. Lohrer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-10-01
Series:Frontiers in Marine Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmars.2018.00359/full
id doaj-fd2d93859fb94ecc8e0157189dbc7c1a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fd2d93859fb94ecc8e0157189dbc7c1a2020-11-25T00:41:05ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Marine Science2296-77452018-10-01510.3389/fmars.2018.00359408044The Challenge of Implementing the Marine Ecosystem Service ConceptMichael Townsend0Kate Davies1Nicholas Hanley2Judi E. Hewitt3Judi E. Hewitt4Carolyn J. Lundquist5Carolyn J. Lundquist6Andrew M. Lohrer7National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Hamilton, New ZealandNational Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Hamilton, New ZealandInstitute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Scotland, United KingdomNational Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Hamilton, New ZealandDepartment of Statistics, University of Auckland, Auckland, New ZealandNational Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Hamilton, New ZealandInstitute of Marine Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New ZealandNational Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Hamilton, New ZealandThe concept of ecosystem services has gained traction as a means of linking societal benefits to the underlying ecology and functioning of ecosystems, and is now frequently included in decision-making and legislation. Moving the ecosystem service concept from theory into practice is now crucial. However, advancements in this area of research differ by ecosystem type, and marine systems lag significantly behind terrestrial counterparts in terms of understanding, implementation, and number of studies. In this paper we explore several reasons why ecosystem service research has been limited in marine systems and we outline the challenges that hinder progress. Marine systems suffer from a scarcity of spatial data relative to terrestrial counterparts. In terrestrial systems the spatial patterns of land-use/land-cover (LULC) are relatively straightforward to access via satellite and have been used as proxy indicators of service provisions. In contrast, remote sensing tools used to study the surface of the Earth are much less effective at capturing images of the seabed, and by extension marine habitats. Marine waters and their constituents are also frequently driven great distances by winds, tides, and currents. This creates a challenge for management as the identification and protection of areas where ecosystem services are exploited is not necessarily sufficient to ensure sustained service delivery. Further complications arise from the three-dimensional uses of marine systems, incorporating activities that use the sea surface, the water column and the benthic habitats below. Progress is being made as technological advancements are resulting in the acquisition of spatial data at faster rates and higher resolutions than previously possible. There is a growing capacity to map, model and value an increasing number of services with initiatives such as InVEST or principle-based modeling. We suggest that awareness is needed around the limited progress in marine systems as this could affect the way we value the biosphere and the relative proportion between biomes.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmars.2018.00359/fullconnectivitydata scarcityecosystem servicesmappingmarinemeasuring
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Michael Townsend
Kate Davies
Nicholas Hanley
Judi E. Hewitt
Judi E. Hewitt
Carolyn J. Lundquist
Carolyn J. Lundquist
Andrew M. Lohrer
spellingShingle Michael Townsend
Kate Davies
Nicholas Hanley
Judi E. Hewitt
Judi E. Hewitt
Carolyn J. Lundquist
Carolyn J. Lundquist
Andrew M. Lohrer
The Challenge of Implementing the Marine Ecosystem Service Concept
Frontiers in Marine Science
connectivity
data scarcity
ecosystem services
mapping
marine
measuring
author_facet Michael Townsend
Kate Davies
Nicholas Hanley
Judi E. Hewitt
Judi E. Hewitt
Carolyn J. Lundquist
Carolyn J. Lundquist
Andrew M. Lohrer
author_sort Michael Townsend
title The Challenge of Implementing the Marine Ecosystem Service Concept
title_short The Challenge of Implementing the Marine Ecosystem Service Concept
title_full The Challenge of Implementing the Marine Ecosystem Service Concept
title_fullStr The Challenge of Implementing the Marine Ecosystem Service Concept
title_full_unstemmed The Challenge of Implementing the Marine Ecosystem Service Concept
title_sort challenge of implementing the marine ecosystem service concept
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Marine Science
issn 2296-7745
publishDate 2018-10-01
description The concept of ecosystem services has gained traction as a means of linking societal benefits to the underlying ecology and functioning of ecosystems, and is now frequently included in decision-making and legislation. Moving the ecosystem service concept from theory into practice is now crucial. However, advancements in this area of research differ by ecosystem type, and marine systems lag significantly behind terrestrial counterparts in terms of understanding, implementation, and number of studies. In this paper we explore several reasons why ecosystem service research has been limited in marine systems and we outline the challenges that hinder progress. Marine systems suffer from a scarcity of spatial data relative to terrestrial counterparts. In terrestrial systems the spatial patterns of land-use/land-cover (LULC) are relatively straightforward to access via satellite and have been used as proxy indicators of service provisions. In contrast, remote sensing tools used to study the surface of the Earth are much less effective at capturing images of the seabed, and by extension marine habitats. Marine waters and their constituents are also frequently driven great distances by winds, tides, and currents. This creates a challenge for management as the identification and protection of areas where ecosystem services are exploited is not necessarily sufficient to ensure sustained service delivery. Further complications arise from the three-dimensional uses of marine systems, incorporating activities that use the sea surface, the water column and the benthic habitats below. Progress is being made as technological advancements are resulting in the acquisition of spatial data at faster rates and higher resolutions than previously possible. There is a growing capacity to map, model and value an increasing number of services with initiatives such as InVEST or principle-based modeling. We suggest that awareness is needed around the limited progress in marine systems as this could affect the way we value the biosphere and the relative proportion between biomes.
topic connectivity
data scarcity
ecosystem services
mapping
marine
measuring
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmars.2018.00359/full
work_keys_str_mv AT michaeltownsend thechallengeofimplementingthemarineecosystemserviceconcept
AT katedavies thechallengeofimplementingthemarineecosystemserviceconcept
AT nicholashanley thechallengeofimplementingthemarineecosystemserviceconcept
AT judiehewitt thechallengeofimplementingthemarineecosystemserviceconcept
AT judiehewitt thechallengeofimplementingthemarineecosystemserviceconcept
AT carolynjlundquist thechallengeofimplementingthemarineecosystemserviceconcept
AT carolynjlundquist thechallengeofimplementingthemarineecosystemserviceconcept
AT andrewmlohrer thechallengeofimplementingthemarineecosystemserviceconcept
AT michaeltownsend challengeofimplementingthemarineecosystemserviceconcept
AT katedavies challengeofimplementingthemarineecosystemserviceconcept
AT nicholashanley challengeofimplementingthemarineecosystemserviceconcept
AT judiehewitt challengeofimplementingthemarineecosystemserviceconcept
AT judiehewitt challengeofimplementingthemarineecosystemserviceconcept
AT carolynjlundquist challengeofimplementingthemarineecosystemserviceconcept
AT carolynjlundquist challengeofimplementingthemarineecosystemserviceconcept
AT andrewmlohrer challengeofimplementingthemarineecosystemserviceconcept
_version_ 1725287194534346752