Measures of journal quality should separate reviews from original research
Metrics of journal quality (e.g., impact factors) are often used to make important judgements regarding journal quality and importance. It is well known that reviews are more highly cited than original research articles. Therefore, it is not surprising that review journals within a field tend to hav...
Main Authors: | Sarah R Supp, Ethan P White |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Queen's University
2010-09-01
|
Series: | Ideas in Ecology and Evolution |
Online Access: | https://ojs.library.queensu.ca/index.php/IEE/article/view/2386 |
Similar Items
-
Citability of original research and reviews in journals and their sponsored supplements.
by: Leslie Citrome
Published: (2010-03-01) -
Should language matter less to journals?
by: Erik von Elm
Published: (2006-05-01) -
Should you publish in electronic journals?
by: Aldrin E. Sweeney
Published: (2001-01-01) -
Review: what should reviews do in an online journal? Towards a New Format
by: Geoffrey Belknap
Published: (2017-11-01) -
Local and Regional Drivers of Biodiversity: From Life-History Traits to System-Level Properties
by: Supp, Sarah R.
Published: (2013)