Stakeholder expectations of the Business Rescue Plan from a South African perspective

Background: A business rescue plan has to comply with a new and vague set of obligations regulated by South African legislation. Expectations of the plan are largely unknown, yet crucial in determining compliance. Establishing an effective benchmark for the plan is essential for the growth and succe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wesley Rosslyn-Smith, Marius Pretorius
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AOSIS 2015-06-01
Series:The Southern African Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business Management
Online Access:https://sajesbm.co.za/index.php/sajesbm/article/view/4
id doaj-fd21c6530205460fa31041681fcc2ab2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fd21c6530205460fa31041681fcc2ab22020-11-24T20:52:21ZengAOSISThe Southern African Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business Management2522-73432071-31852015-06-017113510.4102/sajesbm.v7i1.41Stakeholder expectations of the Business Rescue Plan from a South African perspectiveWesley Rosslyn-Smith0Marius Pretorius1University of PretoriaUniversity of PretoriaBackground: A business rescue plan has to comply with a new and vague set of obligations regulated by South African legislation. Expectations of the plan are largely unknown, yet crucial in determining compliance. Establishing an effective benchmark for the plan is essential for the growth and success of the industry. Purpose: The study set out to answer these questions: What are the most crucial elements needed to fill the gap between the specifics of the Companies Act (2008) and the further elements needed to meet the plan’s primary objective of providing adequate information to stakeholders? What are the international principles applicable to rehabilitation plans and what elements underpin them? Method: Thirteen industry experts were selected and interviewed to identify the most crucial elements of the business rescue plan. Sampling was a combination of convenience and purposive sampling. Data collection obtained data on subjects’ opinions, rankings, agreement and ratings. Results: The study was able to confirm that there is indeed a gap between the mandatory elements prescribed in section 150(2) and the provision of sufficient information required by section 150(1) of the Companies Act No. 71 of 2008. The survey revealed that in the subjects’ expert opinion, the international principles are applicable to the business rescue plan. Conclusion: The crucial elements of the rehabilitation plan selected by the experts offer insight and clarity in terms of what is expected of the plan.   Key words: Business Rescue, Companies Act, Business Plans, Measurement, Insolvency, Turnaround, Reorganisationhttps://sajesbm.co.za/index.php/sajesbm/article/view/4
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Wesley Rosslyn-Smith
Marius Pretorius
spellingShingle Wesley Rosslyn-Smith
Marius Pretorius
Stakeholder expectations of the Business Rescue Plan from a South African perspective
The Southern African Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business Management
author_facet Wesley Rosslyn-Smith
Marius Pretorius
author_sort Wesley Rosslyn-Smith
title Stakeholder expectations of the Business Rescue Plan from a South African perspective
title_short Stakeholder expectations of the Business Rescue Plan from a South African perspective
title_full Stakeholder expectations of the Business Rescue Plan from a South African perspective
title_fullStr Stakeholder expectations of the Business Rescue Plan from a South African perspective
title_full_unstemmed Stakeholder expectations of the Business Rescue Plan from a South African perspective
title_sort stakeholder expectations of the business rescue plan from a south african perspective
publisher AOSIS
series The Southern African Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business Management
issn 2522-7343
2071-3185
publishDate 2015-06-01
description Background: A business rescue plan has to comply with a new and vague set of obligations regulated by South African legislation. Expectations of the plan are largely unknown, yet crucial in determining compliance. Establishing an effective benchmark for the plan is essential for the growth and success of the industry. Purpose: The study set out to answer these questions: What are the most crucial elements needed to fill the gap between the specifics of the Companies Act (2008) and the further elements needed to meet the plan’s primary objective of providing adequate information to stakeholders? What are the international principles applicable to rehabilitation plans and what elements underpin them? Method: Thirteen industry experts were selected and interviewed to identify the most crucial elements of the business rescue plan. Sampling was a combination of convenience and purposive sampling. Data collection obtained data on subjects’ opinions, rankings, agreement and ratings. Results: The study was able to confirm that there is indeed a gap between the mandatory elements prescribed in section 150(2) and the provision of sufficient information required by section 150(1) of the Companies Act No. 71 of 2008. The survey revealed that in the subjects’ expert opinion, the international principles are applicable to the business rescue plan. Conclusion: The crucial elements of the rehabilitation plan selected by the experts offer insight and clarity in terms of what is expected of the plan.   Key words: Business Rescue, Companies Act, Business Plans, Measurement, Insolvency, Turnaround, Reorganisation
url https://sajesbm.co.za/index.php/sajesbm/article/view/4
work_keys_str_mv AT wesleyrosslynsmith stakeholderexpectationsofthebusinessrescueplanfromasouthafricanperspective
AT mariuspretorius stakeholderexpectationsofthebusinessrescueplanfromasouthafricanperspective
_version_ 1716799903746752512