Left Ventricle–Arterial System Interaction in Heart Failure

Ejection fraction (EF) has been viewed as an important index in assessing the contractile state of the left ventricle (LV). However, it is frequently inadequate for the diagnosis and management of heart failure (HF), as a significant subset of HF patients have been found to have reduced EF (HFrEF) w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: John K-J. Li, Glen Atlas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2015-01-01
Series:Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.4137/CMC.S18742
id doaj-fcfca87872f547dbb6086f6577c454ee
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fcfca87872f547dbb6086f6577c454ee2020-11-25T03:43:17ZengSAGE PublishingClinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology1179-54682015-01-019s110.4137/CMC.S18742Left Ventricle–Arterial System Interaction in Heart FailureJohn K-J. Li0Glen Atlas1College of Biomedical Engineering and Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.Department of Chemistry, Chemical Biology, and Biomedical Engineering, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ, USA.Ejection fraction (EF) has been viewed as an important index in assessing the contractile state of the left ventricle (LV). However, it is frequently inadequate for the diagnosis and management of heart failure (HF), as a significant subset of HF patients have been found to have reduced EF (HFrEF) whereas others have preserved EF (HFpEF). It should be noted that the function of the LV is dependent on both preload and afterload, as well as its intrinsic contractile state. Furthermore, stroke volume (SV) is dependent on the properties of the arterial system (AS). Thus, the LV-arterial system interaction plays an important role in those patients with HF. This aspect is investigated through the analysis of the specific parameters involved in the coupling of the LV and AS. This includes contractility and the systolic/diastolic indices of the LV. Furthermore, AS afterload parameters such as vascular stiffness and arterial compliance, and their derived coupling coefficient, are also investigated. We conclude that those parameters, which relate to LV structural changes, are most appropriate in quantifying the LV–AS interaction.https://doi.org/10.4137/CMC.S18742
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author John K-J. Li
Glen Atlas
spellingShingle John K-J. Li
Glen Atlas
Left Ventricle–Arterial System Interaction in Heart Failure
Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology
author_facet John K-J. Li
Glen Atlas
author_sort John K-J. Li
title Left Ventricle–Arterial System Interaction in Heart Failure
title_short Left Ventricle–Arterial System Interaction in Heart Failure
title_full Left Ventricle–Arterial System Interaction in Heart Failure
title_fullStr Left Ventricle–Arterial System Interaction in Heart Failure
title_full_unstemmed Left Ventricle–Arterial System Interaction in Heart Failure
title_sort left ventricle–arterial system interaction in heart failure
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology
issn 1179-5468
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Ejection fraction (EF) has been viewed as an important index in assessing the contractile state of the left ventricle (LV). However, it is frequently inadequate for the diagnosis and management of heart failure (HF), as a significant subset of HF patients have been found to have reduced EF (HFrEF) whereas others have preserved EF (HFpEF). It should be noted that the function of the LV is dependent on both preload and afterload, as well as its intrinsic contractile state. Furthermore, stroke volume (SV) is dependent on the properties of the arterial system (AS). Thus, the LV-arterial system interaction plays an important role in those patients with HF. This aspect is investigated through the analysis of the specific parameters involved in the coupling of the LV and AS. This includes contractility and the systolic/diastolic indices of the LV. Furthermore, AS afterload parameters such as vascular stiffness and arterial compliance, and their derived coupling coefficient, are also investigated. We conclude that those parameters, which relate to LV structural changes, are most appropriate in quantifying the LV–AS interaction.
url https://doi.org/10.4137/CMC.S18742
work_keys_str_mv AT johnkjli leftventriclearterialsysteminteractioninheartfailure
AT glenatlas leftventriclearterialsysteminteractioninheartfailure
_version_ 1724520858282622976