The Effects of Food Labelling on Postexercise Energy Intake in Sedentary Women

Food labelling has been previously reported to influence energy intake (EI). Whether food labels influence postexercise EI remains to be determined. We assessed how food labelling and exercise (Ex) interact to influence food perception and postexercise EI. In this randomized crossover design, 14 ina...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jacynthe Lafrenière, Jessica McNeil, Véronique Provencher, Éric Doucet
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2017-01-01
Series:Journal of Obesity
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/1048973
id doaj-fcf0904e703a463ba6513ed7fd0f6614
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fcf0904e703a463ba6513ed7fd0f66142020-11-25T00:17:56ZengHindawi LimitedJournal of Obesity2090-07082090-07162017-01-01201710.1155/2017/10489731048973The Effects of Food Labelling on Postexercise Energy Intake in Sedentary WomenJacynthe Lafrenière0Jessica McNeil1Véronique Provencher2Éric Doucet3Behavioural and Metabolic Research Unit, School of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, CanadaBehavioural and Metabolic Research Unit, School of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, CanadaInstitute of Nutrition and Functional Foods, Laval University, Quebec City, QC, CanadaBehavioural and Metabolic Research Unit, School of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, CanadaFood labelling has been previously reported to influence energy intake (EI). Whether food labels influence postexercise EI remains to be determined. We assessed how food labelling and exercise (Ex) interact to influence food perception and postexercise EI. In this randomized crossover design, 14 inactive women participated in 4 experimental conditions: Ex (300 kcal at 70% of VO2peak) and lunch labelled as low in fat (LF), Ex and lunch labelled as high in fat (HF), Rest and LF, and Rest and HF. The lunch was composed of a plate of pasta, yogurt, and oatmeal cookies, which had the same nutritional composition across the 4 experimental conditions. EI at lunch and for the 48-hour period covering the testing day and the following day was assessed. Furthermore, perceived healthiness of the meal and appetite ratings were evaluated. There were no effects of exercise and food labelling on EI. However, meals labelled as LF were perceived as heathier, and this label was associated with higher prospective food consumption. Initial beliefs about food items had a stronger effect on healthiness perception than the different food labels and explain the positive correlation with the amount of food consumed (ρ=0.34, P<0.001).http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/1048973
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jacynthe Lafrenière
Jessica McNeil
Véronique Provencher
Éric Doucet
spellingShingle Jacynthe Lafrenière
Jessica McNeil
Véronique Provencher
Éric Doucet
The Effects of Food Labelling on Postexercise Energy Intake in Sedentary Women
Journal of Obesity
author_facet Jacynthe Lafrenière
Jessica McNeil
Véronique Provencher
Éric Doucet
author_sort Jacynthe Lafrenière
title The Effects of Food Labelling on Postexercise Energy Intake in Sedentary Women
title_short The Effects of Food Labelling on Postexercise Energy Intake in Sedentary Women
title_full The Effects of Food Labelling on Postexercise Energy Intake in Sedentary Women
title_fullStr The Effects of Food Labelling on Postexercise Energy Intake in Sedentary Women
title_full_unstemmed The Effects of Food Labelling on Postexercise Energy Intake in Sedentary Women
title_sort effects of food labelling on postexercise energy intake in sedentary women
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Journal of Obesity
issn 2090-0708
2090-0716
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Food labelling has been previously reported to influence energy intake (EI). Whether food labels influence postexercise EI remains to be determined. We assessed how food labelling and exercise (Ex) interact to influence food perception and postexercise EI. In this randomized crossover design, 14 inactive women participated in 4 experimental conditions: Ex (300 kcal at 70% of VO2peak) and lunch labelled as low in fat (LF), Ex and lunch labelled as high in fat (HF), Rest and LF, and Rest and HF. The lunch was composed of a plate of pasta, yogurt, and oatmeal cookies, which had the same nutritional composition across the 4 experimental conditions. EI at lunch and for the 48-hour period covering the testing day and the following day was assessed. Furthermore, perceived healthiness of the meal and appetite ratings were evaluated. There were no effects of exercise and food labelling on EI. However, meals labelled as LF were perceived as heathier, and this label was associated with higher prospective food consumption. Initial beliefs about food items had a stronger effect on healthiness perception than the different food labels and explain the positive correlation with the amount of food consumed (ρ=0.34, P<0.001).
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/1048973
work_keys_str_mv AT jacynthelafreniere theeffectsoffoodlabellingonpostexerciseenergyintakeinsedentarywomen
AT jessicamcneil theeffectsoffoodlabellingonpostexerciseenergyintakeinsedentarywomen
AT veroniqueprovencher theeffectsoffoodlabellingonpostexerciseenergyintakeinsedentarywomen
AT ericdoucet theeffectsoffoodlabellingonpostexerciseenergyintakeinsedentarywomen
AT jacynthelafreniere effectsoffoodlabellingonpostexerciseenergyintakeinsedentarywomen
AT jessicamcneil effectsoffoodlabellingonpostexerciseenergyintakeinsedentarywomen
AT veroniqueprovencher effectsoffoodlabellingonpostexerciseenergyintakeinsedentarywomen
AT ericdoucet effectsoffoodlabellingonpostexerciseenergyintakeinsedentarywomen
_version_ 1725377471262490624