Top-down influences of the medial olivocochlear efferent system in speech perception in noise.
One of the putative functions of the medial olivocochlear (MOC) system is to enhance signal detection in noise. The objective of this study was to elucidate the role of the MOC system in speech perception in noise. In normal-hearing human listeners, we examined (1) the association between magnitude...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2014-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24465686/pdf/?tool=EBI |
id |
doaj-fccfa7d26c504c739785ff6ae08f309f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-fccfa7d26c504c739785ff6ae08f309f2021-03-03T20:16:57ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0191e8575610.1371/journal.pone.0085756Top-down influences of the medial olivocochlear efferent system in speech perception in noise.Srikanta K MishraMark E LutmanOne of the putative functions of the medial olivocochlear (MOC) system is to enhance signal detection in noise. The objective of this study was to elucidate the role of the MOC system in speech perception in noise. In normal-hearing human listeners, we examined (1) the association between magnitude of MOC inhibition and speech-in-noise performance, and (2) the association between MOC inhibition and the amount of contralateral acoustic stimulation (CAS)-induced shift in speech-in-noise acuity. MOC reflex measurements in this study considered critical measurement issues overlooked in past work by: recording relatively low-level, linear click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAEs), adopting 6 dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) criteria, and computing normalized CEOAE differences. We found normalized index to be a stable measure of MOC inhibition (mean = 17.21%). MOC inhibition was not related to speech-in-noise performance measured without CAS. However, CAS in a speech-in-noise task caused an SNRSP enhancement (mean = 2.45 dB), and this improvement in speech-in-noise acuity was directly related to their MOC reflex assayed by CEOAEs. Individuals do not necessarily use the available MOC-unmasking characteristic while listening to speech in noise, or do not utilize unmasking to the extent that can be shown by artificial MOC activation. It may be the case that the MOC is not actually used under natural listening conditions and the higher auditory centers recruit MOC-mediated mechanisms only in specific listening conditions-those conditions remain to be investigated.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24465686/pdf/?tool=EBI |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Srikanta K Mishra Mark E Lutman |
spellingShingle |
Srikanta K Mishra Mark E Lutman Top-down influences of the medial olivocochlear efferent system in speech perception in noise. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Srikanta K Mishra Mark E Lutman |
author_sort |
Srikanta K Mishra |
title |
Top-down influences of the medial olivocochlear efferent system in speech perception in noise. |
title_short |
Top-down influences of the medial olivocochlear efferent system in speech perception in noise. |
title_full |
Top-down influences of the medial olivocochlear efferent system in speech perception in noise. |
title_fullStr |
Top-down influences of the medial olivocochlear efferent system in speech perception in noise. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Top-down influences of the medial olivocochlear efferent system in speech perception in noise. |
title_sort |
top-down influences of the medial olivocochlear efferent system in speech perception in noise. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2014-01-01 |
description |
One of the putative functions of the medial olivocochlear (MOC) system is to enhance signal detection in noise. The objective of this study was to elucidate the role of the MOC system in speech perception in noise. In normal-hearing human listeners, we examined (1) the association between magnitude of MOC inhibition and speech-in-noise performance, and (2) the association between MOC inhibition and the amount of contralateral acoustic stimulation (CAS)-induced shift in speech-in-noise acuity. MOC reflex measurements in this study considered critical measurement issues overlooked in past work by: recording relatively low-level, linear click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAEs), adopting 6 dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) criteria, and computing normalized CEOAE differences. We found normalized index to be a stable measure of MOC inhibition (mean = 17.21%). MOC inhibition was not related to speech-in-noise performance measured without CAS. However, CAS in a speech-in-noise task caused an SNRSP enhancement (mean = 2.45 dB), and this improvement in speech-in-noise acuity was directly related to their MOC reflex assayed by CEOAEs. Individuals do not necessarily use the available MOC-unmasking characteristic while listening to speech in noise, or do not utilize unmasking to the extent that can be shown by artificial MOC activation. It may be the case that the MOC is not actually used under natural listening conditions and the higher auditory centers recruit MOC-mediated mechanisms only in specific listening conditions-those conditions remain to be investigated. |
url |
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24465686/pdf/?tool=EBI |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT srikantakmishra topdowninfluencesofthemedialolivocochlearefferentsysteminspeechperceptioninnoise AT markelutman topdowninfluencesofthemedialolivocochlearefferentsysteminspeechperceptioninnoise |
_version_ |
1714823174561988608 |