Top-down influences of the medial olivocochlear efferent system in speech perception in noise.

One of the putative functions of the medial olivocochlear (MOC) system is to enhance signal detection in noise. The objective of this study was to elucidate the role of the MOC system in speech perception in noise. In normal-hearing human listeners, we examined (1) the association between magnitude...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Srikanta K Mishra, Mark E Lutman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24465686/pdf/?tool=EBI
id doaj-fccfa7d26c504c739785ff6ae08f309f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fccfa7d26c504c739785ff6ae08f309f2021-03-03T20:16:57ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0191e8575610.1371/journal.pone.0085756Top-down influences of the medial olivocochlear efferent system in speech perception in noise.Srikanta K MishraMark E LutmanOne of the putative functions of the medial olivocochlear (MOC) system is to enhance signal detection in noise. The objective of this study was to elucidate the role of the MOC system in speech perception in noise. In normal-hearing human listeners, we examined (1) the association between magnitude of MOC inhibition and speech-in-noise performance, and (2) the association between MOC inhibition and the amount of contralateral acoustic stimulation (CAS)-induced shift in speech-in-noise acuity. MOC reflex measurements in this study considered critical measurement issues overlooked in past work by: recording relatively low-level, linear click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAEs), adopting 6 dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) criteria, and computing normalized CEOAE differences. We found normalized index to be a stable measure of MOC inhibition (mean = 17.21%). MOC inhibition was not related to speech-in-noise performance measured without CAS. However, CAS in a speech-in-noise task caused an SNRSP enhancement (mean = 2.45 dB), and this improvement in speech-in-noise acuity was directly related to their MOC reflex assayed by CEOAEs. Individuals do not necessarily use the available MOC-unmasking characteristic while listening to speech in noise, or do not utilize unmasking to the extent that can be shown by artificial MOC activation. It may be the case that the MOC is not actually used under natural listening conditions and the higher auditory centers recruit MOC-mediated mechanisms only in specific listening conditions-those conditions remain to be investigated.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24465686/pdf/?tool=EBI
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Srikanta K Mishra
Mark E Lutman
spellingShingle Srikanta K Mishra
Mark E Lutman
Top-down influences of the medial olivocochlear efferent system in speech perception in noise.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Srikanta K Mishra
Mark E Lutman
author_sort Srikanta K Mishra
title Top-down influences of the medial olivocochlear efferent system in speech perception in noise.
title_short Top-down influences of the medial olivocochlear efferent system in speech perception in noise.
title_full Top-down influences of the medial olivocochlear efferent system in speech perception in noise.
title_fullStr Top-down influences of the medial olivocochlear efferent system in speech perception in noise.
title_full_unstemmed Top-down influences of the medial olivocochlear efferent system in speech perception in noise.
title_sort top-down influences of the medial olivocochlear efferent system in speech perception in noise.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2014-01-01
description One of the putative functions of the medial olivocochlear (MOC) system is to enhance signal detection in noise. The objective of this study was to elucidate the role of the MOC system in speech perception in noise. In normal-hearing human listeners, we examined (1) the association between magnitude of MOC inhibition and speech-in-noise performance, and (2) the association between MOC inhibition and the amount of contralateral acoustic stimulation (CAS)-induced shift in speech-in-noise acuity. MOC reflex measurements in this study considered critical measurement issues overlooked in past work by: recording relatively low-level, linear click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAEs), adopting 6 dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) criteria, and computing normalized CEOAE differences. We found normalized index to be a stable measure of MOC inhibition (mean = 17.21%). MOC inhibition was not related to speech-in-noise performance measured without CAS. However, CAS in a speech-in-noise task caused an SNRSP enhancement (mean = 2.45 dB), and this improvement in speech-in-noise acuity was directly related to their MOC reflex assayed by CEOAEs. Individuals do not necessarily use the available MOC-unmasking characteristic while listening to speech in noise, or do not utilize unmasking to the extent that can be shown by artificial MOC activation. It may be the case that the MOC is not actually used under natural listening conditions and the higher auditory centers recruit MOC-mediated mechanisms only in specific listening conditions-those conditions remain to be investigated.
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24465686/pdf/?tool=EBI
work_keys_str_mv AT srikantakmishra topdowninfluencesofthemedialolivocochlearefferentsysteminspeechperceptioninnoise
AT markelutman topdowninfluencesofthemedialolivocochlearefferentsysteminspeechperceptioninnoise
_version_ 1714823174561988608