Crambe fruit drying with natural air in stationary dryers

ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to assess the drying behavior and quality of crambe fruit seeds dried with natural air and submitted to different airflows in stationary dryers. Dryings were carried out in July and September 2014. The experiment consisted of three treatments of drying the crambe f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sebastião Rodrigues Cardoso Neto, Osvaldo Resende, Lilian Moreira Costa, Daniel Emanuel Cabral de Oliveira
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Federal do Ceará
Series:Revista Ciência Agronômica
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-66902018000400592&lng=en&tlng=en
id doaj-fcc0c5e897594edc99153335708413d8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fcc0c5e897594edc99153335708413d82020-11-25T00:15:35ZengUniversidade Federal do CearáRevista Ciência Agronômica 1806-669049459259810.5935/1806-6690.20180067S1806-66902018000400592Crambe fruit drying with natural air in stationary dryersSebastião Rodrigues Cardoso NetoOsvaldo ResendeLilian Moreira CostaDaniel Emanuel Cabral de OliveiraABSTRACT The aim of this study was to assess the drying behavior and quality of crambe fruit seeds dried with natural air and submitted to different airflows in stationary dryers. Dryings were carried out in July and September 2014. The experiment consisted of three treatments of drying the crambe fruits with natural air in stationary dryers with airflows of 10.08, 15.05, and 25.03 m3 min−1 t−1 and a control treatment composed of crambe fruits with an initial moisture content without going through the drying process. After drying, tests of moisture content, germination, germination rate index, and electrical conductivity were performed in order to compare the treatments. The data were submitted to analysis of variance and mean comparison by the Tukey's test at 5% significance. Among the airflows used in the experiment in both natural air dryings in July and September, no interference was observed for crambe fruit quality. Drying carried out in September was faster and showed a lower expenditure and cost of electricity when compared to that performed in July, which is due to better climatic conditions. No difference was observed in the drying times between airflows, but the drying with natural air using an airflow of 15.05 m3 min−1 t−1 was more profitable.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-66902018000400592&lng=en&tlng=enMoisture contentPhysiological qualityBiodiesel
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sebastião Rodrigues Cardoso Neto
Osvaldo Resende
Lilian Moreira Costa
Daniel Emanuel Cabral de Oliveira
spellingShingle Sebastião Rodrigues Cardoso Neto
Osvaldo Resende
Lilian Moreira Costa
Daniel Emanuel Cabral de Oliveira
Crambe fruit drying with natural air in stationary dryers
Revista Ciência Agronômica
Moisture content
Physiological quality
Biodiesel
author_facet Sebastião Rodrigues Cardoso Neto
Osvaldo Resende
Lilian Moreira Costa
Daniel Emanuel Cabral de Oliveira
author_sort Sebastião Rodrigues Cardoso Neto
title Crambe fruit drying with natural air in stationary dryers
title_short Crambe fruit drying with natural air in stationary dryers
title_full Crambe fruit drying with natural air in stationary dryers
title_fullStr Crambe fruit drying with natural air in stationary dryers
title_full_unstemmed Crambe fruit drying with natural air in stationary dryers
title_sort crambe fruit drying with natural air in stationary dryers
publisher Universidade Federal do Ceará
series Revista Ciência Agronômica
issn 1806-6690
description ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to assess the drying behavior and quality of crambe fruit seeds dried with natural air and submitted to different airflows in stationary dryers. Dryings were carried out in July and September 2014. The experiment consisted of three treatments of drying the crambe fruits with natural air in stationary dryers with airflows of 10.08, 15.05, and 25.03 m3 min−1 t−1 and a control treatment composed of crambe fruits with an initial moisture content without going through the drying process. After drying, tests of moisture content, germination, germination rate index, and electrical conductivity were performed in order to compare the treatments. The data were submitted to analysis of variance and mean comparison by the Tukey's test at 5% significance. Among the airflows used in the experiment in both natural air dryings in July and September, no interference was observed for crambe fruit quality. Drying carried out in September was faster and showed a lower expenditure and cost of electricity when compared to that performed in July, which is due to better climatic conditions. No difference was observed in the drying times between airflows, but the drying with natural air using an airflow of 15.05 m3 min−1 t−1 was more profitable.
topic Moisture content
Physiological quality
Biodiesel
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-66902018000400592&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT sebastiaorodriguescardosoneto crambefruitdryingwithnaturalairinstationarydryers
AT osvaldoresende crambefruitdryingwithnaturalairinstationarydryers
AT lilianmoreiracosta crambefruitdryingwithnaturalairinstationarydryers
AT danielemanuelcabraldeoliveira crambefruitdryingwithnaturalairinstationarydryers
_version_ 1725386153799974912