Are HFpEF and HFmrEF So Different? The Need to Understand Distinct Phenotypes
Traditionally, patients with heart failure (HF) are divided according to ejection fraction (EF) threshold more or <50%. In 2016, the ESC guidelines introduced a new subgroup of HF patients including those subjects with EF ranging between 40 and 49% called heart failure with midrange EF (HFmrE...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021-05-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2021.676658/full |
id |
doaj-fcb893e3448745658b42e486382a4950 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-fcb893e3448745658b42e486382a49502021-05-21T06:22:07ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine2297-055X2021-05-01810.3389/fcvm.2021.676658676658Are HFpEF and HFmrEF So Different? The Need to Understand Distinct PhenotypesAlberto Palazzuoli0Matteo Beltrami1Cardiovascular Diseases Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, Le Scotte Hospital University of Siena, Siena, ItalyCardiology Unit, San Giovanni di Dio Hospital, Florence, ItalyTraditionally, patients with heart failure (HF) are divided according to ejection fraction (EF) threshold more or <50%. In 2016, the ESC guidelines introduced a new subgroup of HF patients including those subjects with EF ranging between 40 and 49% called heart failure with midrange EF (HFmrEF). This group is poorly represented in clinical trials, and it includes both patients with previous HFrEF having a good response to therapy and subjects with initial preserved EF appearance in which systolic function has been impaired. The categorization according to EF has recently been questioned because this variable is not really a representative of the myocardial contractile function and it could vary in relation to different hemodynamic conditions. Therefore, EF could significantly change over a short-term period and its measurement depends on the scan time course. Finally, although EF is widely recognized and measured worldwide, it has significant interobserver variability even in the most accredited echo laboratories. These assumptions imply that the same patient evaluated in different periods or by different physicians could be classified as HFmrEF or HFpEF. Thus, the two HF subtypes probably subtend different responses to the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms. Similarly, the adaptation to hemodynamic stimuli and to metabolic alterations could be different for different HF stages and periods. In this review, we analyze similarities and dissimilarities and we hypothesize that clinical and morphological characteristics of the two syndromes are not so discordant.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2021.676658/fullejection fractionheart failure with mid-range ejection fractionphenotypebiomarkerssystolic function |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Alberto Palazzuoli Matteo Beltrami |
spellingShingle |
Alberto Palazzuoli Matteo Beltrami Are HFpEF and HFmrEF So Different? The Need to Understand Distinct Phenotypes Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine ejection fraction heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction phenotype biomarkers systolic function |
author_facet |
Alberto Palazzuoli Matteo Beltrami |
author_sort |
Alberto Palazzuoli |
title |
Are HFpEF and HFmrEF So Different? The Need to Understand Distinct Phenotypes |
title_short |
Are HFpEF and HFmrEF So Different? The Need to Understand Distinct Phenotypes |
title_full |
Are HFpEF and HFmrEF So Different? The Need to Understand Distinct Phenotypes |
title_fullStr |
Are HFpEF and HFmrEF So Different? The Need to Understand Distinct Phenotypes |
title_full_unstemmed |
Are HFpEF and HFmrEF So Different? The Need to Understand Distinct Phenotypes |
title_sort |
are hfpef and hfmref so different? the need to understand distinct phenotypes |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine |
issn |
2297-055X |
publishDate |
2021-05-01 |
description |
Traditionally, patients with heart failure (HF) are divided according to ejection fraction (EF) threshold more or <50%. In 2016, the ESC guidelines introduced a new subgroup of HF patients including those subjects with EF ranging between 40 and 49% called heart failure with midrange EF (HFmrEF). This group is poorly represented in clinical trials, and it includes both patients with previous HFrEF having a good response to therapy and subjects with initial preserved EF appearance in which systolic function has been impaired. The categorization according to EF has recently been questioned because this variable is not really a representative of the myocardial contractile function and it could vary in relation to different hemodynamic conditions. Therefore, EF could significantly change over a short-term period and its measurement depends on the scan time course. Finally, although EF is widely recognized and measured worldwide, it has significant interobserver variability even in the most accredited echo laboratories. These assumptions imply that the same patient evaluated in different periods or by different physicians could be classified as HFmrEF or HFpEF. Thus, the two HF subtypes probably subtend different responses to the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms. Similarly, the adaptation to hemodynamic stimuli and to metabolic alterations could be different for different HF stages and periods. In this review, we analyze similarities and dissimilarities and we hypothesize that clinical and morphological characteristics of the two syndromes are not so discordant. |
topic |
ejection fraction heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction phenotype biomarkers systolic function |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2021.676658/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT albertopalazzuoli arehfpefandhfmrefsodifferenttheneedtounderstanddistinctphenotypes AT matteobeltrami arehfpefandhfmrefsodifferenttheneedtounderstanddistinctphenotypes |
_version_ |
1721432401703337984 |