Variation at genes influencing facial morphology are not associated with developmental imprecision in human faces.
Facial asymmetries are commonly used as a proxy for human developmental imprecision resulting from inbreeding, and thus reduced genetic heterozygosity. Several environmental factors influence human facial asymmetry (e.g., health care, parasites), but the generalizability of findings on genetic stres...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2014-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4051657?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-fcb39f1051ec4404869191fa8c523d1b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-fcb39f1051ec4404869191fa8c523d1b2020-11-25T00:59:49ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0196e9900910.1371/journal.pone.0099009Variation at genes influencing facial morphology are not associated with developmental imprecision in human faces.Sonja WindhagerHelmut SchaschlKatrin SchaeferPhilipp MitteroeckerSusanne HuberBernard WallnerMartin FiederFacial asymmetries are commonly used as a proxy for human developmental imprecision resulting from inbreeding, and thus reduced genetic heterozygosity. Several environmental factors influence human facial asymmetry (e.g., health care, parasites), but the generalizability of findings on genetic stressors has been limited in humans by sample characteristics (island populations, endogamy) and indirect genetic assessment (inference from pedigrees). In a sample of 3215 adult humans from the Rotterdam Study, we therefore studied the relationship of facial asymmetry, estimated from nine mid-facial landmarks, with genetic variation at 102 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) loci recently associated with facial shape variation. We further tested whether the degree of individual heterozygosity is negatively correlated with facial asymmetry. An ANOVA tree regression did not identify any SNP relating to either fluctuating asymmetry or total asymmetry. In a general linear model, only age and sex--but neither heterozygosity nor any SNP previously reported to covary with facial shape--was significantly related to total or fluctuating asymmetry of the midface. Our study does not corroborate the common assumption in evolutionary and behavioral biology that morphological asymmetries reflect heterozygosity. Our results, however, may be affected by a relatively small degree of inbreeding, a relatively stable environment, and an advanced age in the Rotterdam sample. Further large-scale genetic studies, including gene expression studies, are necessary to validate the genetic and developmental origin of morphological asymmetries.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4051657?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Sonja Windhager Helmut Schaschl Katrin Schaefer Philipp Mitteroecker Susanne Huber Bernard Wallner Martin Fieder |
spellingShingle |
Sonja Windhager Helmut Schaschl Katrin Schaefer Philipp Mitteroecker Susanne Huber Bernard Wallner Martin Fieder Variation at genes influencing facial morphology are not associated with developmental imprecision in human faces. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Sonja Windhager Helmut Schaschl Katrin Schaefer Philipp Mitteroecker Susanne Huber Bernard Wallner Martin Fieder |
author_sort |
Sonja Windhager |
title |
Variation at genes influencing facial morphology are not associated with developmental imprecision in human faces. |
title_short |
Variation at genes influencing facial morphology are not associated with developmental imprecision in human faces. |
title_full |
Variation at genes influencing facial morphology are not associated with developmental imprecision in human faces. |
title_fullStr |
Variation at genes influencing facial morphology are not associated with developmental imprecision in human faces. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Variation at genes influencing facial morphology are not associated with developmental imprecision in human faces. |
title_sort |
variation at genes influencing facial morphology are not associated with developmental imprecision in human faces. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2014-01-01 |
description |
Facial asymmetries are commonly used as a proxy for human developmental imprecision resulting from inbreeding, and thus reduced genetic heterozygosity. Several environmental factors influence human facial asymmetry (e.g., health care, parasites), but the generalizability of findings on genetic stressors has been limited in humans by sample characteristics (island populations, endogamy) and indirect genetic assessment (inference from pedigrees). In a sample of 3215 adult humans from the Rotterdam Study, we therefore studied the relationship of facial asymmetry, estimated from nine mid-facial landmarks, with genetic variation at 102 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) loci recently associated with facial shape variation. We further tested whether the degree of individual heterozygosity is negatively correlated with facial asymmetry. An ANOVA tree regression did not identify any SNP relating to either fluctuating asymmetry or total asymmetry. In a general linear model, only age and sex--but neither heterozygosity nor any SNP previously reported to covary with facial shape--was significantly related to total or fluctuating asymmetry of the midface. Our study does not corroborate the common assumption in evolutionary and behavioral biology that morphological asymmetries reflect heterozygosity. Our results, however, may be affected by a relatively small degree of inbreeding, a relatively stable environment, and an advanced age in the Rotterdam sample. Further large-scale genetic studies, including gene expression studies, are necessary to validate the genetic and developmental origin of morphological asymmetries. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4051657?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT sonjawindhager variationatgenesinfluencingfacialmorphologyarenotassociatedwithdevelopmentalimprecisioninhumanfaces AT helmutschaschl variationatgenesinfluencingfacialmorphologyarenotassociatedwithdevelopmentalimprecisioninhumanfaces AT katrinschaefer variationatgenesinfluencingfacialmorphologyarenotassociatedwithdevelopmentalimprecisioninhumanfaces AT philippmitteroecker variationatgenesinfluencingfacialmorphologyarenotassociatedwithdevelopmentalimprecisioninhumanfaces AT susannehuber variationatgenesinfluencingfacialmorphologyarenotassociatedwithdevelopmentalimprecisioninhumanfaces AT bernardwallner variationatgenesinfluencingfacialmorphologyarenotassociatedwithdevelopmentalimprecisioninhumanfaces AT martinfieder variationatgenesinfluencingfacialmorphologyarenotassociatedwithdevelopmentalimprecisioninhumanfaces |
_version_ |
1725215938196799488 |