Variation at genes influencing facial morphology are not associated with developmental imprecision in human faces.

Facial asymmetries are commonly used as a proxy for human developmental imprecision resulting from inbreeding, and thus reduced genetic heterozygosity. Several environmental factors influence human facial asymmetry (e.g., health care, parasites), but the generalizability of findings on genetic stres...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sonja Windhager, Helmut Schaschl, Katrin Schaefer, Philipp Mitteroecker, Susanne Huber, Bernard Wallner, Martin Fieder
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4051657?pdf=render
id doaj-fcb39f1051ec4404869191fa8c523d1b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fcb39f1051ec4404869191fa8c523d1b2020-11-25T00:59:49ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0196e9900910.1371/journal.pone.0099009Variation at genes influencing facial morphology are not associated with developmental imprecision in human faces.Sonja WindhagerHelmut SchaschlKatrin SchaeferPhilipp MitteroeckerSusanne HuberBernard WallnerMartin FiederFacial asymmetries are commonly used as a proxy for human developmental imprecision resulting from inbreeding, and thus reduced genetic heterozygosity. Several environmental factors influence human facial asymmetry (e.g., health care, parasites), but the generalizability of findings on genetic stressors has been limited in humans by sample characteristics (island populations, endogamy) and indirect genetic assessment (inference from pedigrees). In a sample of 3215 adult humans from the Rotterdam Study, we therefore studied the relationship of facial asymmetry, estimated from nine mid-facial landmarks, with genetic variation at 102 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) loci recently associated with facial shape variation. We further tested whether the degree of individual heterozygosity is negatively correlated with facial asymmetry. An ANOVA tree regression did not identify any SNP relating to either fluctuating asymmetry or total asymmetry. In a general linear model, only age and sex--but neither heterozygosity nor any SNP previously reported to covary with facial shape--was significantly related to total or fluctuating asymmetry of the midface. Our study does not corroborate the common assumption in evolutionary and behavioral biology that morphological asymmetries reflect heterozygosity. Our results, however, may be affected by a relatively small degree of inbreeding, a relatively stable environment, and an advanced age in the Rotterdam sample. Further large-scale genetic studies, including gene expression studies, are necessary to validate the genetic and developmental origin of morphological asymmetries.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4051657?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sonja Windhager
Helmut Schaschl
Katrin Schaefer
Philipp Mitteroecker
Susanne Huber
Bernard Wallner
Martin Fieder
spellingShingle Sonja Windhager
Helmut Schaschl
Katrin Schaefer
Philipp Mitteroecker
Susanne Huber
Bernard Wallner
Martin Fieder
Variation at genes influencing facial morphology are not associated with developmental imprecision in human faces.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Sonja Windhager
Helmut Schaschl
Katrin Schaefer
Philipp Mitteroecker
Susanne Huber
Bernard Wallner
Martin Fieder
author_sort Sonja Windhager
title Variation at genes influencing facial morphology are not associated with developmental imprecision in human faces.
title_short Variation at genes influencing facial morphology are not associated with developmental imprecision in human faces.
title_full Variation at genes influencing facial morphology are not associated with developmental imprecision in human faces.
title_fullStr Variation at genes influencing facial morphology are not associated with developmental imprecision in human faces.
title_full_unstemmed Variation at genes influencing facial morphology are not associated with developmental imprecision in human faces.
title_sort variation at genes influencing facial morphology are not associated with developmental imprecision in human faces.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2014-01-01
description Facial asymmetries are commonly used as a proxy for human developmental imprecision resulting from inbreeding, and thus reduced genetic heterozygosity. Several environmental factors influence human facial asymmetry (e.g., health care, parasites), but the generalizability of findings on genetic stressors has been limited in humans by sample characteristics (island populations, endogamy) and indirect genetic assessment (inference from pedigrees). In a sample of 3215 adult humans from the Rotterdam Study, we therefore studied the relationship of facial asymmetry, estimated from nine mid-facial landmarks, with genetic variation at 102 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) loci recently associated with facial shape variation. We further tested whether the degree of individual heterozygosity is negatively correlated with facial asymmetry. An ANOVA tree regression did not identify any SNP relating to either fluctuating asymmetry or total asymmetry. In a general linear model, only age and sex--but neither heterozygosity nor any SNP previously reported to covary with facial shape--was significantly related to total or fluctuating asymmetry of the midface. Our study does not corroborate the common assumption in evolutionary and behavioral biology that morphological asymmetries reflect heterozygosity. Our results, however, may be affected by a relatively small degree of inbreeding, a relatively stable environment, and an advanced age in the Rotterdam sample. Further large-scale genetic studies, including gene expression studies, are necessary to validate the genetic and developmental origin of morphological asymmetries.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4051657?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT sonjawindhager variationatgenesinfluencingfacialmorphologyarenotassociatedwithdevelopmentalimprecisioninhumanfaces
AT helmutschaschl variationatgenesinfluencingfacialmorphologyarenotassociatedwithdevelopmentalimprecisioninhumanfaces
AT katrinschaefer variationatgenesinfluencingfacialmorphologyarenotassociatedwithdevelopmentalimprecisioninhumanfaces
AT philippmitteroecker variationatgenesinfluencingfacialmorphologyarenotassociatedwithdevelopmentalimprecisioninhumanfaces
AT susannehuber variationatgenesinfluencingfacialmorphologyarenotassociatedwithdevelopmentalimprecisioninhumanfaces
AT bernardwallner variationatgenesinfluencingfacialmorphologyarenotassociatedwithdevelopmentalimprecisioninhumanfaces
AT martinfieder variationatgenesinfluencingfacialmorphologyarenotassociatedwithdevelopmentalimprecisioninhumanfaces
_version_ 1725215938196799488