Judicialization, right to health and prevention

This article deals with a research which had the aim of analyzing the practice of preventive medicine, with regard to vaccination, due to the intervention of the Judicial System. To achieve this aim, we made a research in the State of Rio de Janeiro Justice Court about the decisions concerned with t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Felipe Dutra Asensi, Adriana Aidar, Frederico Ramos, Roseni Pinheiro
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Instituto de Comunicação e Informação Científica e Tecnológica em Saúde (Icict) da Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz) 2015-03-01
Series:RECIIS
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/935
id doaj-fca37fdf768e4b11946bb5324a4d74bf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fca37fdf768e4b11946bb5324a4d74bf2021-05-02T02:28:10ZengInstituto de Comunicação e Informação Científica e Tecnológica em Saúde (Icict) da Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz)RECIIS1981-62782015-03-019110.29397/reciis.v9i1.935933Judicialization, right to health and preventionFelipe Dutra Asensi0Adriana Aidar1Frederico Ramos2Roseni Pinheiro3Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), Instituto de Medicina Social (IMS-UERJ). Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), Instituto de Estudos Sociais e Políticos (IESP-UERJ). Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil. Universidade de Uberaba (UNIUBE), Departamento de Direito, Uberaba, MG, Brasil.Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), Instituto de Medicina Social (IMS-UERJ). Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil. Universidade de Uberaba (UNIUBE), Departamento de Direito, Uberaba, MG, Brasil.Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), Instituto de Medicina Social (IMS-UERJ). Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilThis article deals with a research which had the aim of analyzing the practice of preventive medicine, with regard to vaccination, due to the intervention of the Judicial System. To achieve this aim, we made a research in the State of Rio de Janeiro Justice Court about the decisions concerned with the matter passed from 2000 to 2012 years. 110 cases were found, of which 25 were about the state responsabilty for vaccine supply. Among these processes, it was found that all of them treated vaccine supply to individuals. The results indicate that there are no demands for vaccination collectively, i.e. there are no actions requesting the state to act preventively, to safeguard a collective right to health at least with regard to vaccination. There is also no initiative on the part of legal associations or institutions, as the Public defender offices and the Public Prosecutor's Office, to safeguard collective vaccination.https://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/935JudicializaçãoDireitoDireito à saúdePrevenção de doençasVacinasMedicina preventiva.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Felipe Dutra Asensi
Adriana Aidar
Frederico Ramos
Roseni Pinheiro
spellingShingle Felipe Dutra Asensi
Adriana Aidar
Frederico Ramos
Roseni Pinheiro
Judicialization, right to health and prevention
RECIIS
Judicialização
Direito
Direito à saúde
Prevenção de doenças
Vacinas
Medicina preventiva.
author_facet Felipe Dutra Asensi
Adriana Aidar
Frederico Ramos
Roseni Pinheiro
author_sort Felipe Dutra Asensi
title Judicialization, right to health and prevention
title_short Judicialization, right to health and prevention
title_full Judicialization, right to health and prevention
title_fullStr Judicialization, right to health and prevention
title_full_unstemmed Judicialization, right to health and prevention
title_sort judicialization, right to health and prevention
publisher Instituto de Comunicação e Informação Científica e Tecnológica em Saúde (Icict) da Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz)
series RECIIS
issn 1981-6278
publishDate 2015-03-01
description This article deals with a research which had the aim of analyzing the practice of preventive medicine, with regard to vaccination, due to the intervention of the Judicial System. To achieve this aim, we made a research in the State of Rio de Janeiro Justice Court about the decisions concerned with the matter passed from 2000 to 2012 years. 110 cases were found, of which 25 were about the state responsabilty for vaccine supply. Among these processes, it was found that all of them treated vaccine supply to individuals. The results indicate that there are no demands for vaccination collectively, i.e. there are no actions requesting the state to act preventively, to safeguard a collective right to health at least with regard to vaccination. There is also no initiative on the part of legal associations or institutions, as the Public defender offices and the Public Prosecutor's Office, to safeguard collective vaccination.
topic Judicialização
Direito
Direito à saúde
Prevenção de doenças
Vacinas
Medicina preventiva.
url https://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/935
work_keys_str_mv AT felipedutraasensi judicializationrighttohealthandprevention
AT adrianaaidar judicializationrighttohealthandprevention
AT fredericoramos judicializationrighttohealthandprevention
AT rosenipinheiro judicializationrighttohealthandprevention
_version_ 1721496123651129344