Judicialization, right to health and prevention
This article deals with a research which had the aim of analyzing the practice of preventive medicine, with regard to vaccination, due to the intervention of the Judicial System. To achieve this aim, we made a research in the State of Rio de Janeiro Justice Court about the decisions concerned with t...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Instituto de Comunicação e Informação Científica e Tecnológica em Saúde (Icict) da Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz)
2015-03-01
|
Series: | RECIIS |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/935 |
id |
doaj-fca37fdf768e4b11946bb5324a4d74bf |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-fca37fdf768e4b11946bb5324a4d74bf2021-05-02T02:28:10ZengInstituto de Comunicação e Informação Científica e Tecnológica em Saúde (Icict) da Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz)RECIIS1981-62782015-03-019110.29397/reciis.v9i1.935933Judicialization, right to health and preventionFelipe Dutra Asensi0Adriana Aidar1Frederico Ramos2Roseni Pinheiro3Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), Instituto de Medicina Social (IMS-UERJ). Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), Instituto de Estudos Sociais e Políticos (IESP-UERJ). Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil. Universidade de Uberaba (UNIUBE), Departamento de Direito, Uberaba, MG, Brasil.Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), Instituto de Medicina Social (IMS-UERJ). Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil. Universidade de Uberaba (UNIUBE), Departamento de Direito, Uberaba, MG, Brasil.Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), Instituto de Medicina Social (IMS-UERJ). Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilThis article deals with a research which had the aim of analyzing the practice of preventive medicine, with regard to vaccination, due to the intervention of the Judicial System. To achieve this aim, we made a research in the State of Rio de Janeiro Justice Court about the decisions concerned with the matter passed from 2000 to 2012 years. 110 cases were found, of which 25 were about the state responsabilty for vaccine supply. Among these processes, it was found that all of them treated vaccine supply to individuals. The results indicate that there are no demands for vaccination collectively, i.e. there are no actions requesting the state to act preventively, to safeguard a collective right to health at least with regard to vaccination. There is also no initiative on the part of legal associations or institutions, as the Public defender offices and the Public Prosecutor's Office, to safeguard collective vaccination.https://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/935JudicializaçãoDireitoDireito à saúdePrevenção de doençasVacinasMedicina preventiva. |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Felipe Dutra Asensi Adriana Aidar Frederico Ramos Roseni Pinheiro |
spellingShingle |
Felipe Dutra Asensi Adriana Aidar Frederico Ramos Roseni Pinheiro Judicialization, right to health and prevention RECIIS Judicialização Direito Direito à saúde Prevenção de doenças Vacinas Medicina preventiva. |
author_facet |
Felipe Dutra Asensi Adriana Aidar Frederico Ramos Roseni Pinheiro |
author_sort |
Felipe Dutra Asensi |
title |
Judicialization, right to health and prevention |
title_short |
Judicialization, right to health and prevention |
title_full |
Judicialization, right to health and prevention |
title_fullStr |
Judicialization, right to health and prevention |
title_full_unstemmed |
Judicialization, right to health and prevention |
title_sort |
judicialization, right to health and prevention |
publisher |
Instituto de Comunicação e Informação Científica e Tecnológica em Saúde (Icict) da Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz) |
series |
RECIIS |
issn |
1981-6278 |
publishDate |
2015-03-01 |
description |
This article deals with a research which had the aim of analyzing the practice of preventive medicine, with regard to vaccination, due to the intervention of the Judicial System. To achieve this aim, we made a research in the State of Rio de Janeiro Justice Court about the decisions concerned with the matter passed from 2000 to 2012 years. 110 cases were found, of which 25 were about the state responsabilty for vaccine supply. Among these processes, it was found that all of them treated vaccine supply to individuals. The results indicate that there are no demands for vaccination collectively, i.e. there are no actions requesting the state to act preventively, to safeguard a collective right to health at least with regard to vaccination. There is also no initiative on the part of legal associations or institutions, as the Public defender offices and the Public Prosecutor's Office, to safeguard collective vaccination. |
topic |
Judicialização Direito Direito à saúde Prevenção de doenças Vacinas Medicina preventiva. |
url |
https://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/935 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT felipedutraasensi judicializationrighttohealthandprevention AT adrianaaidar judicializationrighttohealthandprevention AT fredericoramos judicializationrighttohealthandprevention AT rosenipinheiro judicializationrighttohealthandprevention |
_version_ |
1721496123651129344 |