Evaluation of efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy as an adjunctive therapy in the management of thermal burns

Background: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is an adjunctive therapy that has been proposed to improve outcome in thermal burns. It involves the therapeutic administration of 100% oxygen at environmental pressures >1 atmosphere absolute (ATA). Methodology: An open, prospective, observational stu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Naveen Kumar, V K Tiwari
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2020-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Burns
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijburns.com/article.asp?issn=0971-653X;year=2020;volume=28;issue=1;spage=44;epage=50;aulast=Kumar
id doaj-fc9ac21e7531446f855513309c2e4268
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fc9ac21e7531446f855513309c2e42682021-06-02T07:07:15ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Burns0971-653X2020-01-01281445010.4103/ijb.ijb_25_19Evaluation of efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy as an adjunctive therapy in the management of thermal burnsNaveen KumarV K TiwariBackground: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is an adjunctive therapy that has been proposed to improve outcome in thermal burns. It involves the therapeutic administration of 100% oxygen at environmental pressures >1 atmosphere absolute (ATA). Methodology: An open, prospective, observational study was conducted for a period of 18 months which included fifty patients who were allocated to either adjunctive hyperbaric therapy in addition to the existing protocol of burn management (Group A) or only existing protocol of burn management (Group B) with daily dressing and debridement. All patients between the age of 18 and 60 years with 15%–60% of second and third degrees of thermal burns were included. HBOT was administered at 2.0 ATA in a “monoplace” chamber for 90 min, 6 days a week. A total of ten sessions were administered to each patient along with conventional treatment. Results: The mean time of wound healing in Group A was 18.96 days, whereas in Group B, it was 43.64 days. The mean number of days of hospital stay in Group A was 32.04 days, whereas in Group B, those were 51.2 days. Similarly, the mean pain score and mean fluid requirement were less in Group A when compared to those of Group B. Conclusion: With our study, we can conclude that HBOT is an effective adjunctive modality of treatment in the management of thermal burns.http://www.ijburns.com/article.asp?issn=0971-653X;year=2020;volume=28;issue=1;spage=44;epage=50;aulast=Kumarburnshyperbaric oxygentherapythermalwound healing
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Naveen Kumar
V K Tiwari
spellingShingle Naveen Kumar
V K Tiwari
Evaluation of efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy as an adjunctive therapy in the management of thermal burns
Indian Journal of Burns
burns
hyperbaric oxygen
therapy
thermal
wound healing
author_facet Naveen Kumar
V K Tiwari
author_sort Naveen Kumar
title Evaluation of efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy as an adjunctive therapy in the management of thermal burns
title_short Evaluation of efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy as an adjunctive therapy in the management of thermal burns
title_full Evaluation of efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy as an adjunctive therapy in the management of thermal burns
title_fullStr Evaluation of efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy as an adjunctive therapy in the management of thermal burns
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy as an adjunctive therapy in the management of thermal burns
title_sort evaluation of efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy as an adjunctive therapy in the management of thermal burns
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Indian Journal of Burns
issn 0971-653X
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Background: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is an adjunctive therapy that has been proposed to improve outcome in thermal burns. It involves the therapeutic administration of 100% oxygen at environmental pressures >1 atmosphere absolute (ATA). Methodology: An open, prospective, observational study was conducted for a period of 18 months which included fifty patients who were allocated to either adjunctive hyperbaric therapy in addition to the existing protocol of burn management (Group A) or only existing protocol of burn management (Group B) with daily dressing and debridement. All patients between the age of 18 and 60 years with 15%–60% of second and third degrees of thermal burns were included. HBOT was administered at 2.0 ATA in a “monoplace” chamber for 90 min, 6 days a week. A total of ten sessions were administered to each patient along with conventional treatment. Results: The mean time of wound healing in Group A was 18.96 days, whereas in Group B, it was 43.64 days. The mean number of days of hospital stay in Group A was 32.04 days, whereas in Group B, those were 51.2 days. Similarly, the mean pain score and mean fluid requirement were less in Group A when compared to those of Group B. Conclusion: With our study, we can conclude that HBOT is an effective adjunctive modality of treatment in the management of thermal burns.
topic burns
hyperbaric oxygen
therapy
thermal
wound healing
url http://www.ijburns.com/article.asp?issn=0971-653X;year=2020;volume=28;issue=1;spage=44;epage=50;aulast=Kumar
work_keys_str_mv AT naveenkumar evaluationofefficacyofhyperbaricoxygentherapyasanadjunctivetherapyinthemanagementofthermalburns
AT vktiwari evaluationofefficacyofhyperbaricoxygentherapyasanadjunctivetherapyinthemanagementofthermalburns
_version_ 1721407440529915904