Internet-based psychodynamic therapy vs cognitive behavioural therapy for social anxiety disorder: A preference study

Objective: Both Internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy (ICBT) and Internet-delivered psychodynamic psychotherapy (IPDT) have shown promise in the treatment of social anxiety disorder (SAD). However, little is known about client preferences and what predicts treatment outcome. The objective...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tomas Lindegaard, Thomas Hesslow, Maja Nilsson, Robert Johansson, Per Carlbring, Peter Lilliengren, Gerhard Andersson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-04-01
Series:Internet Interventions
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214782919301319
id doaj-fc98e0cd006f4d6d8552698aa478597f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fc98e0cd006f4d6d8552698aa478597f2020-11-25T03:23:37ZengElsevierInternet Interventions2214-78292020-04-0120Internet-based psychodynamic therapy vs cognitive behavioural therapy for social anxiety disorder: A preference studyTomas Lindegaard0Thomas Hesslow1Maja Nilsson2Robert Johansson3Per Carlbring4Peter Lilliengren5Gerhard Andersson6Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden; Corresponding author at: Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden.Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, SwedenDepartment of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, SwedenDepartment of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, SwedenDepartment of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, SwedenErsta Sköndal Bräcke University College, Stockholm, SwedenDepartment of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden; Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, SwedenObjective: Both Internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy (ICBT) and Internet-delivered psychodynamic psychotherapy (IPDT) have shown promise in the treatment of social anxiety disorder (SAD). However, little is known about client preferences and what predicts treatment outcome. The objective of the present pilot study was to examine preference for ICBT versus IPDT in the treatment of SAD and whether participants' preference strength and therapeutic alliance predicted treatment response. Further, we also investigated the effect of the two treatments, including 6-months follow-up. Method: Thirty-six participants were instructed to choose between either IPDT or ICBT based on a brief description. Both treatments were 10 weeks long. Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale – Self Report was used as the primary outcome measure. Results: IPDT (N = 23; 63.9%) was preferred more often than ICBT (N = 13; 36.1%), but the difference did not reach statistical significance (p = .10). Preference strength did not predict the treatment effect but therapeutic alliance did. The observed within-group effects for the treatment period were d = 0.40 [−0.21, 0.99] for the IPDT group and d = 0.53 [−0.29, 1.31] for the ICBT group. An intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis revealed no significant difference between the two treatments on any outcome measure at either post-treatment or at six months follow-up. Conclusion: The present pilot study did not find a difference in preference for IPDT or ICBT in the treatment of SAD and both treatments resulted in small to moderate improvements in symptoms of SAD. Preference strength might not predict treatment effect, but this needs to be tested in larger studies.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214782919301319Social anxiety disorderPsychodynamic psychotherapyCognitive behavioural therapyInternet-delivered treatmentPreference matching
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tomas Lindegaard
Thomas Hesslow
Maja Nilsson
Robert Johansson
Per Carlbring
Peter Lilliengren
Gerhard Andersson
spellingShingle Tomas Lindegaard
Thomas Hesslow
Maja Nilsson
Robert Johansson
Per Carlbring
Peter Lilliengren
Gerhard Andersson
Internet-based psychodynamic therapy vs cognitive behavioural therapy for social anxiety disorder: A preference study
Internet Interventions
Social anxiety disorder
Psychodynamic psychotherapy
Cognitive behavioural therapy
Internet-delivered treatment
Preference matching
author_facet Tomas Lindegaard
Thomas Hesslow
Maja Nilsson
Robert Johansson
Per Carlbring
Peter Lilliengren
Gerhard Andersson
author_sort Tomas Lindegaard
title Internet-based psychodynamic therapy vs cognitive behavioural therapy for social anxiety disorder: A preference study
title_short Internet-based psychodynamic therapy vs cognitive behavioural therapy for social anxiety disorder: A preference study
title_full Internet-based psychodynamic therapy vs cognitive behavioural therapy for social anxiety disorder: A preference study
title_fullStr Internet-based psychodynamic therapy vs cognitive behavioural therapy for social anxiety disorder: A preference study
title_full_unstemmed Internet-based psychodynamic therapy vs cognitive behavioural therapy for social anxiety disorder: A preference study
title_sort internet-based psychodynamic therapy vs cognitive behavioural therapy for social anxiety disorder: a preference study
publisher Elsevier
series Internet Interventions
issn 2214-7829
publishDate 2020-04-01
description Objective: Both Internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy (ICBT) and Internet-delivered psychodynamic psychotherapy (IPDT) have shown promise in the treatment of social anxiety disorder (SAD). However, little is known about client preferences and what predicts treatment outcome. The objective of the present pilot study was to examine preference for ICBT versus IPDT in the treatment of SAD and whether participants' preference strength and therapeutic alliance predicted treatment response. Further, we also investigated the effect of the two treatments, including 6-months follow-up. Method: Thirty-six participants were instructed to choose between either IPDT or ICBT based on a brief description. Both treatments were 10 weeks long. Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale – Self Report was used as the primary outcome measure. Results: IPDT (N = 23; 63.9%) was preferred more often than ICBT (N = 13; 36.1%), but the difference did not reach statistical significance (p = .10). Preference strength did not predict the treatment effect but therapeutic alliance did. The observed within-group effects for the treatment period were d = 0.40 [−0.21, 0.99] for the IPDT group and d = 0.53 [−0.29, 1.31] for the ICBT group. An intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis revealed no significant difference between the two treatments on any outcome measure at either post-treatment or at six months follow-up. Conclusion: The present pilot study did not find a difference in preference for IPDT or ICBT in the treatment of SAD and both treatments resulted in small to moderate improvements in symptoms of SAD. Preference strength might not predict treatment effect, but this needs to be tested in larger studies.
topic Social anxiety disorder
Psychodynamic psychotherapy
Cognitive behavioural therapy
Internet-delivered treatment
Preference matching
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214782919301319
work_keys_str_mv AT tomaslindegaard internetbasedpsychodynamictherapyvscognitivebehaviouraltherapyforsocialanxietydisorderapreferencestudy
AT thomashesslow internetbasedpsychodynamictherapyvscognitivebehaviouraltherapyforsocialanxietydisorderapreferencestudy
AT majanilsson internetbasedpsychodynamictherapyvscognitivebehaviouraltherapyforsocialanxietydisorderapreferencestudy
AT robertjohansson internetbasedpsychodynamictherapyvscognitivebehaviouraltherapyforsocialanxietydisorderapreferencestudy
AT percarlbring internetbasedpsychodynamictherapyvscognitivebehaviouraltherapyforsocialanxietydisorderapreferencestudy
AT peterlilliengren internetbasedpsychodynamictherapyvscognitivebehaviouraltherapyforsocialanxietydisorderapreferencestudy
AT gerhardandersson internetbasedpsychodynamictherapyvscognitivebehaviouraltherapyforsocialanxietydisorderapreferencestudy
_version_ 1724605436764618752