Regressiewe stemassimilasie in Afrikaans en Nederlands

The phonological process of assimilation of voice is a distinct feature of both Dutch and Afrikaans. However, there seem to be some prominent differences between these two related languages, especially with regard to the phenomenon of regressive assimilation of voice. Regressive assimilation in Dutc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: D. Wissing
Format: Article
Language:Afrikaans
Published: AOSIS 1991-05-01
Series:Literator
Online Access:https://literator.org.za/index.php/literator/article/view/764
id doaj-fc940a3c67304fa39afdae19d9e4a668
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fc940a3c67304fa39afdae19d9e4a6682020-11-24T22:55:56ZafrAOSISLiterator0258-22792219-82371991-05-011229710610.4102/lit.v12i2.764704Regressiewe stemassimilasie in Afrikaans en NederlandsD. WissingThe phonological process of assimilation of voice is a distinct feature of both Dutch and Afrikaans. However, there seem to be some prominent differences between these two related languages, especially with regard to the phenomenon of regressive assimilation of voice. Regressive assimilation in Dutch is, according to the literature on this subject, much more restricted than in Afrikaans with regard to the types of segment that are conditioning this sound change. In Afrikaans, assimilation of voice can be triggered by any voiced segment; in Dutch it is stated that only voiced explosives are responsible for such change. In this article it will be demonstrated that this is an unnecessary restriction, and indeed incorrect. This faulty description is due to the fact that the ‘w’ sound in Dutch (as in "water") is typified in a variety of ways in the Dutch literature. It will be shown that ‘w’ is a voiced fricative, and is, together with the voiced explosives, involved in regressive assimilation of voice in much the same way as it is in Afrikaans.https://literator.org.za/index.php/literator/article/view/764
collection DOAJ
language Afrikaans
format Article
sources DOAJ
author D. Wissing
spellingShingle D. Wissing
Regressiewe stemassimilasie in Afrikaans en Nederlands
Literator
author_facet D. Wissing
author_sort D. Wissing
title Regressiewe stemassimilasie in Afrikaans en Nederlands
title_short Regressiewe stemassimilasie in Afrikaans en Nederlands
title_full Regressiewe stemassimilasie in Afrikaans en Nederlands
title_fullStr Regressiewe stemassimilasie in Afrikaans en Nederlands
title_full_unstemmed Regressiewe stemassimilasie in Afrikaans en Nederlands
title_sort regressiewe stemassimilasie in afrikaans en nederlands
publisher AOSIS
series Literator
issn 0258-2279
2219-8237
publishDate 1991-05-01
description The phonological process of assimilation of voice is a distinct feature of both Dutch and Afrikaans. However, there seem to be some prominent differences between these two related languages, especially with regard to the phenomenon of regressive assimilation of voice. Regressive assimilation in Dutch is, according to the literature on this subject, much more restricted than in Afrikaans with regard to the types of segment that are conditioning this sound change. In Afrikaans, assimilation of voice can be triggered by any voiced segment; in Dutch it is stated that only voiced explosives are responsible for such change. In this article it will be demonstrated that this is an unnecessary restriction, and indeed incorrect. This faulty description is due to the fact that the ‘w’ sound in Dutch (as in "water") is typified in a variety of ways in the Dutch literature. It will be shown that ‘w’ is a voiced fricative, and is, together with the voiced explosives, involved in regressive assimilation of voice in much the same way as it is in Afrikaans.
url https://literator.org.za/index.php/literator/article/view/764
work_keys_str_mv AT dwissing regressiewestemassimilasieinafrikaansennederlands
_version_ 1725655733950742528