A think aloud study comparing the validity and acceptability of discrete choice and best worst scaling methods.
<h4>Objectives</h4>This study provides insights into the validity and acceptability of Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) and profile-case Best Worst Scaling (BWS) methods for eliciting preferences for health care in a priority-setting context.<h4>Methods</h4>An adult sample (N...
Main Authors: | Jennifer A Whitty, Ruth Walker, Xanthe Golenko, Julie Ratcliffe |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2014-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24759637/pdf/?tool=EBI |
Similar Items
-
The Role of Trust in Explaining Food Choice: Combining Choice Experiment and Attribute Best–Worst Scaling
by: Ching-Hua Yeh, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01) -
Testing Cessation Messages for Cigarette Package Inserts: Findings from a Best/Worst Discrete Choice Experiment
by: James F. Thrasher, et al.
Published: (2018-02-01) -
Thinking about thinking aloud : an investigation of think-aloud methods in usability testing
by: Alhadreti, Obead
Published: (2016) -
Using think aloud protocols in the validity investigation of an assessment of complex thinking
by: Lyons-Thomas, Juliette
Published: (2014) -
Using think aloud protocols in the validity investigation of an assessment of complex thinking
by: Lyons-Thomas, Juliette
Published: (2014)