Effect of angiotensin receptor blockade on central haemodynamics in essential hypertension: results of a randomised trial

Objective. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have been shown to lower central augmentation index (cAI), an index of arterial wave reflection, more than β-blockers. We tested whether this is also true for long-term treatment with an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB). Methods. One-hundre...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Markus P Schneider, Christian Delles, Arnfried U Klingbeil, Malte Ludwig, Rainer E Kolloch, Michael Krekler, Klaus O Stumpe, Roland E Schmieder
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi - SAGE Publishing 2008-03-01
Series:Journal of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3317/jraas.2008.003
id doaj-fc8a9a7c28ad4484850903205455e21a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fc8a9a7c28ad4484850903205455e21a2021-05-02T18:52:23ZengHindawi - SAGE PublishingJournal of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System1470-32032008-03-01910.3317/jraas.2008.003Effect of angiotensin receptor blockade on central haemodynamics in essential hypertension: results of a randomised trialMarkus P SchneiderChristian DellesArnfried U KlingbeilMalte LudwigRainer E KollochMichael KreklerKlaus O StumpeRoland E SchmiederObjective. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have been shown to lower central augmentation index (cAI), an index of arterial wave reflection, more than β-blockers. We tested whether this is also true for long-term treatment with an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB). Methods. One-hundred and fifty-six subjects with essential hypertension were randomised to treatment with either irbesartan or atenolol. cAI and central blood pressure (BP) were determined by pulse wave analysis from the radial and the carotid artery after six and after 18 months treatment. Results. Peripheral and central systolic and diastolic BP were reduced to a similar extent A in the two groups. cAI was reduced with irbesartan, but increased with atenolol (derived from the carotid artery: -6±10 vs. -4±12% after six months, p<0.001; —4±12 vs. +1±11% after 18 months; p=0.011). Furthermore, central to peripheral pulse pressure (PP) amplification was unaffected by treatment with irbesartan, but decreased with atenolol. Conclusions. Although treatment with irbesartan and atenolol similarly decreased peripheral and central BP, only treatment with irbesartan had beneficial effects on arterial wave reflection and preserved PP amplification. These haemodynamic effects may at least partly explain the reported differential effects of ARB versus β-blocker treatment on cardiovascular mortality in patients with essential hypertension.https://doi.org/10.3317/jraas.2008.003
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Markus P Schneider
Christian Delles
Arnfried U Klingbeil
Malte Ludwig
Rainer E Kolloch
Michael Krekler
Klaus O Stumpe
Roland E Schmieder
spellingShingle Markus P Schneider
Christian Delles
Arnfried U Klingbeil
Malte Ludwig
Rainer E Kolloch
Michael Krekler
Klaus O Stumpe
Roland E Schmieder
Effect of angiotensin receptor blockade on central haemodynamics in essential hypertension: results of a randomised trial
Journal of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System
author_facet Markus P Schneider
Christian Delles
Arnfried U Klingbeil
Malte Ludwig
Rainer E Kolloch
Michael Krekler
Klaus O Stumpe
Roland E Schmieder
author_sort Markus P Schneider
title Effect of angiotensin receptor blockade on central haemodynamics in essential hypertension: results of a randomised trial
title_short Effect of angiotensin receptor blockade on central haemodynamics in essential hypertension: results of a randomised trial
title_full Effect of angiotensin receptor blockade on central haemodynamics in essential hypertension: results of a randomised trial
title_fullStr Effect of angiotensin receptor blockade on central haemodynamics in essential hypertension: results of a randomised trial
title_full_unstemmed Effect of angiotensin receptor blockade on central haemodynamics in essential hypertension: results of a randomised trial
title_sort effect of angiotensin receptor blockade on central haemodynamics in essential hypertension: results of a randomised trial
publisher Hindawi - SAGE Publishing
series Journal of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System
issn 1470-3203
publishDate 2008-03-01
description Objective. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have been shown to lower central augmentation index (cAI), an index of arterial wave reflection, more than β-blockers. We tested whether this is also true for long-term treatment with an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB). Methods. One-hundred and fifty-six subjects with essential hypertension were randomised to treatment with either irbesartan or atenolol. cAI and central blood pressure (BP) were determined by pulse wave analysis from the radial and the carotid artery after six and after 18 months treatment. Results. Peripheral and central systolic and diastolic BP were reduced to a similar extent A in the two groups. cAI was reduced with irbesartan, but increased with atenolol (derived from the carotid artery: -6±10 vs. -4±12% after six months, p<0.001; —4±12 vs. +1±11% after 18 months; p=0.011). Furthermore, central to peripheral pulse pressure (PP) amplification was unaffected by treatment with irbesartan, but decreased with atenolol. Conclusions. Although treatment with irbesartan and atenolol similarly decreased peripheral and central BP, only treatment with irbesartan had beneficial effects on arterial wave reflection and preserved PP amplification. These haemodynamic effects may at least partly explain the reported differential effects of ARB versus β-blocker treatment on cardiovascular mortality in patients with essential hypertension.
url https://doi.org/10.3317/jraas.2008.003
work_keys_str_mv AT markuspschneider effectofangiotensinreceptorblockadeoncentralhaemodynamicsinessentialhypertensionresultsofarandomisedtrial
AT christiandelles effectofangiotensinreceptorblockadeoncentralhaemodynamicsinessentialhypertensionresultsofarandomisedtrial
AT arnfrieduklingbeil effectofangiotensinreceptorblockadeoncentralhaemodynamicsinessentialhypertensionresultsofarandomisedtrial
AT malteludwig effectofangiotensinreceptorblockadeoncentralhaemodynamicsinessentialhypertensionresultsofarandomisedtrial
AT rainerekolloch effectofangiotensinreceptorblockadeoncentralhaemodynamicsinessentialhypertensionresultsofarandomisedtrial
AT michaelkrekler effectofangiotensinreceptorblockadeoncentralhaemodynamicsinessentialhypertensionresultsofarandomisedtrial
AT klausostumpe effectofangiotensinreceptorblockadeoncentralhaemodynamicsinessentialhypertensionresultsofarandomisedtrial
AT rolandeschmieder effectofangiotensinreceptorblockadeoncentralhaemodynamicsinessentialhypertensionresultsofarandomisedtrial
_version_ 1721488712772091904