Differential migration in Pacific salmon and trout: Patterns and hypotheses

Migrations affect the population dynamics, life history, evolution, and connections of animals to natural ecosystems and humans. Many species and populations display partial migration (some individuals migrate and some do not), and differential migration (migration distance varies). Partial migratio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Quinn Thomas P.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: De Gruyter 2021-01-01
Series:Animal Migration
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/ami-2021-0001
id doaj-fc80ccbb424d474783242903c247365a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fc80ccbb424d474783242903c247365a2021-10-03T07:42:25ZengDe GruyterAnimal Migration2084-88382021-01-018111810.1515/ami-2021-0001ami-2021-0001Differential migration in Pacific salmon and trout: Patterns and hypothesesQuinn Thomas P.0School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USAMigrations affect the population dynamics, life history, evolution, and connections of animals to natural ecosystems and humans. Many species and populations display partial migration (some individuals migrate and some do not), and differential migration (migration distance varies). Partial migration is widely distributed in fishes but the term differential migration is much less commonly applied, despite the occurrence of this phenomenon. This paper briefly reviews the extent of differential migration in Pacific salmon and trout (genus Oncorhynchus), a very extensively studied group. Three hypotheses are presented to explain the patterns among species: 1) phylogenetic relationships, 2) the prevalence of partial migration (i.e., variation in anadromy), and 3) life history patterns (iteroparous or semelparous, and duration spent feeding at sea prior to maturation). Each hypothesis has some support but none is consistent with all patterns. The prevalence of differential migration, ranging from essentially non-existent to common within a species, reflects phylogeny and life history, interacting with the geographic features of the region where juvenile salmon enter the ocean. Notwithstanding the uncertain evolution of this behavior, it has very clear implications for salmon conservation, as it strongly affects exposure to predators, patterns of fishery exploitation and also uptake of toxic contaminants.https://doi.org/10.1515/ami-2021-0001partial migrationanadromylife historyphylogenyconservationoncorhynchus
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Quinn Thomas P.
spellingShingle Quinn Thomas P.
Differential migration in Pacific salmon and trout: Patterns and hypotheses
Animal Migration
partial migration
anadromy
life history
phylogeny
conservation
oncorhynchus
author_facet Quinn Thomas P.
author_sort Quinn Thomas P.
title Differential migration in Pacific salmon and trout: Patterns and hypotheses
title_short Differential migration in Pacific salmon and trout: Patterns and hypotheses
title_full Differential migration in Pacific salmon and trout: Patterns and hypotheses
title_fullStr Differential migration in Pacific salmon and trout: Patterns and hypotheses
title_full_unstemmed Differential migration in Pacific salmon and trout: Patterns and hypotheses
title_sort differential migration in pacific salmon and trout: patterns and hypotheses
publisher De Gruyter
series Animal Migration
issn 2084-8838
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Migrations affect the population dynamics, life history, evolution, and connections of animals to natural ecosystems and humans. Many species and populations display partial migration (some individuals migrate and some do not), and differential migration (migration distance varies). Partial migration is widely distributed in fishes but the term differential migration is much less commonly applied, despite the occurrence of this phenomenon. This paper briefly reviews the extent of differential migration in Pacific salmon and trout (genus Oncorhynchus), a very extensively studied group. Three hypotheses are presented to explain the patterns among species: 1) phylogenetic relationships, 2) the prevalence of partial migration (i.e., variation in anadromy), and 3) life history patterns (iteroparous or semelparous, and duration spent feeding at sea prior to maturation). Each hypothesis has some support but none is consistent with all patterns. The prevalence of differential migration, ranging from essentially non-existent to common within a species, reflects phylogeny and life history, interacting with the geographic features of the region where juvenile salmon enter the ocean. Notwithstanding the uncertain evolution of this behavior, it has very clear implications for salmon conservation, as it strongly affects exposure to predators, patterns of fishery exploitation and also uptake of toxic contaminants.
topic partial migration
anadromy
life history
phylogeny
conservation
oncorhynchus
url https://doi.org/10.1515/ami-2021-0001
work_keys_str_mv AT quinnthomasp differentialmigrationinpacificsalmonandtroutpatternsandhypotheses
_version_ 1716846235518763008